this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
624 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

75876 readers
3598 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bongles@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 hour ago

I want off this ride.

[–] Fit_Series_573@lemmy.world 20 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This has to be what trump is seeing over on Truth Social that's got him thinking cities are burning from protests, or at least that could be what his advisors are showing

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

How many AI videos of them eating the dogs are there?

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 minute ago* (last edited 47 seconds ago)

Fuuuuck, gaslighting the gaslighter in chief. The end of humanity bc reality has become trapped within an endless circle of AI generated gaslighting and fuckery.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Expect much more of this and soon enough it will be impossible to distinguish between Real and fake videos

We can fix a little with digitally.sigbed videos to at least show that a video came from a verified source but that still won't fix the issue with leaked videos. Basically, leaked videos and open mike videos / audio clips are over, we can't ever trust them anymore

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 hour ago

I think the article really makes the point that it doesn't matter. The videos can LITERALLY have a watermark on them from the AI software, and people just dgaf. The battle is lost before it begins.

As with things like quotes and claims that could always be fake, it's back to the old journalistic practices of verifying sources with a second source. But that means being ignorant of things that were not being investigated by journalists, which creates a different filter bubble.

[–] Fit_Series_573@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

With the way things spread on social media from user generated content it would be hard to get that done I'm sure. Like the video almost everyone saw of Charlie, the video was indeed real but the spread was so beyond control that ot broke almost every filter algorithm on social media. I can't imagine how much "suppression" talk would be mentioned if we had digitally sign the source even though it would be totally valid. [Viral > Truth]

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 1 points 58 minutes ago

NOT true! MAGA are KNOWN to do Their Own Research TM and would Know if it's AI!

Yet another reason they probably want to stir up violence. Not only does it tip us closer towards civil war, capturing public violence means more data to feed into AI and generate violent videos.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 26 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The troll farms are disastrous to this country.

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The foreign ones or the domestic ones?

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 53 minutes ago
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 70 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

The phrase “I voted for this” has become a common thing for far-right supporters of Trump to say when something particularly brutal has happened to their political opponents.

I'll tell you what's at the bottom of it, If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you. -- Lyndon B. Johnson, attributed by Bill Moyers

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 23 points 4 hours ago

That last part is still accurate He had it right.

I remember as a kid growing up in a extended family just emerging from the worst kind of american poor. My fathers generation was the first to have decent living conditions but still faced hunger as children. They all could remember when they got electricity and running water. The older generation of aunts and uncles would often say things like 'We may be poor but at least were not N******s". That hasn't changed a lot in some circular family tree's.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I've met racists who love this quote, they just think that "convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man" is equivalent to "convince a colored man he’s as good as a white man" here. They really do.

Also there are plenty of people who don't consider themselves racist, yet think their (American, British, whatever) color hierarchy exists outside of English-speaking countries and people there have to take it into account.

The kind that "is not racist", but if someone is racist, it's only the way that they are on top. They can't conceive that a Vietnamese or a Chinese racist may have a racial hierarchy where they are near chimps. When facing evidence of such being possible, they lose their mind and behave, honestly, quite racist.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

5th generation warfare. It's bots saying that (aka human slaves in large slave networks)

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 20 points 9 hours ago

WELCOME TO THE WORRRLD OF TOMOORRROW!

Where truth doesn't matter anymore.

[–] verdi@feddit.org 26 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Confederate psy ops. The civil war is back, you just don't know it yet.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 80 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

What's wild about this is that people predicted AI would be used for nefarious purposes, but generally in the form of like, showing your opponents doing crimes. But here it's being used to show their own side doing crimes while the other side is only made to look "cringy" or more like a stereotype.

It really speaks to the utter depravity of the US right that, given a machine that can generate any video of anything they could imagine, this is what they do. These people are utterly incompatible with any kind of free or even functional society, and I really don't know what could ever be done fix them or their culture.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

If they instead made convincing AI generated videos of some imaginary leftists going first and starting a revolution, then it might not have the intended effect.

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 18 points 10 hours ago

Some dumbass sumbitch eating this up. Unfortunately it’s like 50x that. So many dumb motherfuckers, not enough natural disasters to help the rest of us along.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 56 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The smartest move I ever made was dropping all mainstream social media. I don't get any of this BS. Meta, Twitter, and Reddit are a plague on society and I'll have no part in it.

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

What would prevent Lemmy from becoming another Reddit if it gains the same user count? Not promoting specific users only because they have a lot of Karma?

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 2 points 49 minutes ago

If Lemmy, or any other fediverse social network, ever got that big, you would be guaranteed there would be plenty of splinters of de-federation in the network. There would be small networks totally isolated from the mainstream cluster, and others that only federate parts of it. You could choose to hang out in some counter-cultural bubble, or choose a curated connection to the biggest networks, if you didn't want to engage in them fully. The trick would be finding "your people," but the tech works.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

What would prevent Lemmy from becoming another Reddit

You'd need to convince every one hosting a Lemmy instance (and all possible future ones) to sell their platform for money or blackmail them into submission...

With Reddit, they only needed to convince Spez which is like convincing an alcoholic to have a free shot of his fav poison

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 17 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Nothing prevents it totally. It could 100% be just as bad as Facebook. But only those servers owned by those propaganda pushers. It is harder to take over the whole and push your agenda to all users, when they can simply block your instance and let you stew in your hate.

Best example for that: the tankies, which are mostly ignored or ridiculed outside their own safe spaces.

And while I do think there will always be nationalistic fuckwards, I think the big number now and in the past are only possible due to massive propaganda. If that is not possible, people steer more to "normal" stuff. Because most people are not majorally negatively affected by the status quo.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Because most people are not majorally negatively affected by the status quo.

tell me you live in a rich country without explicitly saying so

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yeah, after writing it I felt it was wrong. What I meant is: most people are not hurt by what is being pushed in the mass media as source of the problem. If that outside factor goes away, they will focus more on what is happening around them. That the status quo in our current world is hurting a lot of people is absolutely correct, sadly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›