Court says he can't fuck kids, but did that stop him.
this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
312 points (99.4% liked)
News
32406 readers
3770 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Fire her, don't fire her, but the writing's on the wall at this point. This decision doesn't change that the trust in the US dollar has been severely injured by the administration. The world is rotating out of the dollar and into other holdings to hedge against madness such as politically-motivated firings at the Federal Reserve.
We should not have reached this point. It is insanity.
Yanis Varoufakis did an explantion a few months back suggesting hwe thunks the strategy is about devaluing the dollar and moving towards crypto. Presumably Trump wants to move the worlds default currency to the Trump coin?
It's part of trump's twisted plan. Devalue the dollar so it's easier to sell and export stuff so you bring manufacturing back, and this bring back that golden age.
That it was only golden because the rest of the world didn't have manufacturing yet or it was blown up in the war is not taken into account. That it might lead to sweatshop like conditions this time around is not his problem.
The list of legal things Trump has done this presidency might be shorter.
Heading to SCOTUS? Gorsuch & Kavanaugh have been drooling for the right moment to declare independent agencies unconstitutional, let alone Thomas and Alito. That’s 4 votes right there.
Yep, straight to SCOTUS.
The thing that makes the outcome suspenseful is that Gorsuch and Kavanaugh have been signalling "but not the Fed" when they're attacking agency independence. Probably because they have stock portfolios.
So it seems like they may try to carve some distinction that saves the Fed from the same fate as the FTC, CFPB, NRLB, and merit protection board. It's not at all clear what's that might be.
Can’t imagine what Frankenstein interpretation of the law would allow for that. If you believe in the unitary executive, then it should unitary.
That said, Gorsuch in 2019 gave his full throat endorsement of unitary executive in Gundy. Kavanaugh also joined the court at the time and while he didn’t take part Gundy, he later signaled his support of Gorsuch’s take.
Which begs the question… it’s been six years and they haven’t put their money where their mouth is. Maybe they’re ready now — but I agree with you, it’s felt a little like they might be worried about the consequences of what a unitary executive would mean.
Meanwhile the performative senate has already confirmed a replacement. Republicans have completely removed the rule of law.
Damn, that did happen. https://apnews.com/article/federal-reserve-miran-trump-70a09bdf2e10839f35e1596cafe5c415
No it didn't, this was for "Adriana Kugler"'s seat.