UK Politics

Corbyn's interview a few weeks ago called out vilifying of Trans folk and made clear they should feel safe from discrimination to live their lives.

Yes there is one MP that has slightly different views but still made clear there should be safe spaces. Let's not make perfect be the enemy of good as I don't think any party has every MP with the same view on trans people and all issues close to our heart. I'm pretty confident Your Party will have a progressive view on Trans rights.

Politics is like bus routes. You'll never find anything that goes exactly to your door, so you pick the one that gets you closest so you can walk the rest of the way.

I can see why he wrote to Badenoch, but Farage is basically part of the problem. Although it would be funny to see his response.

Ok, so Zack Polanski is absolutely spot on on every issue, more so than Ed Davey, who is a free marketeer who is happy to sell our power infrastructure to foreign interests. Ed Davey privatised Royal Mail and failed to investigate the Horizon scandal whilst in post as the minister for postal affairs. All prominent politicians have some shit in their past, so why are you picking on Polanski?

I agree that Ed is a very competent and credible leader fronting possibly the most professional parties in Westminster (despite the stunts and gaffs). However I feel like you are parroting smears on Polanski and to and extent Corbyn.

The hypnosis breasts incident was instigated by a Sun journalist and repeated every time he reaches any headlines by the right wing press. For a story that was largely fabricated.

The Corbyn party I feel you have more of a point as they seem quite unorganised and split (and they have so much overlap with Green that there isn't all that much point). But didn't they cut association with the guy questioning trans rights?

Just to add as well, there are other leftist options in the country who are doing quite well and currently seem pretty competent, though they are not English.

Zach's is made up by tbe right wing ltress though. I guess repeat a lie often enough...

That's usually how a dialogue starts. Unless you think a tweet would have been better. I get the frustration, these are just word on a piece of paper, but it's hard to have action (and let's hope it comes to that) without being in agreement first.

Because he's a technocrat, not a leader. He might be good at doing one thing (he was director of public prosecution and his dad was a tool maker, did you know?) but it doesn't translate into leading at the top of politics. Same with Sunak. Both very earnest at wanting to do the best for the country (as they saw it), but both also absolute shit at selling their visions for the future properly.

Christ, dare I say bring back Blair?

It's not an email though. It's clearly a letter, look there's a signature at the bottom written in pen.

Because it's a scanned letter. Not the email itself...