Luvs2Spuj

joined 2 years ago
[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

Anyone who says the best car always wins can be redirected back to this season.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Almost, I still think it needs a collosal fuck up again next week.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Poor Charles ~~Sebastian~~ ~~Kimi~~ ~~Fernando~~ ~~Felipe~~

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My job is bullshit, but my job is not who I am.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

SHIT, because I'm childish

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I noticed it was a Yougov poll and then it made sense. I've lost all hope of the general population being able to make any reasonable decision. This might be the worst (best?) example yet.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What a race. Those mercs defended like lions, great for them but also critical for Lando's championship.

The running joke that is Stroll needs to retire, he's ruined so many people's races over the years.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

I'll forward any I find to my local MP

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

That rooster did his duty and deserves the poultry medal of honour.

I've read through the other comments here. Free roaming pitbulls are to my mind unacceptable. As others have already said, shooting them wouldn't be unreasonable, but you have a dilemma with that, which is understandable even if I'm not sure I agree.

I'm unclear on the exact timelines of all these things happening, but if they were looking for food wouldn't they have eaten the Rooster? Possibly you interrupted them, or they were just dealing with the rooster aggression? It's hard to understand how the hens were not victims after the rooster was killed, so I'm wondering how and why.

If you believe they are looking for food, would you consider leaving an easier meal for them until a time that you feel like you have adequately reinforced the enclosure? That might attract other unwanted guests though depending where you are.

You could also possibly trap them (in a pen for example) and call the authorities to correctly deal with it if you can't find an owner for them.

An electric fence is probably the only thing short of actually harming them that is going to keep them away.

Hopefully they don't come across small children before some action is taken.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Never seen this before, nice.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Sea horse trestle

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Terrible news. I think this is the first time I've been genuinely upset about the passing of someone I knew only from their public life and work. He seemed like such a great guy.

 

I'm wondering if there is a recommendation for a small camera to take hiking, or just for general convenience. I like to turn my phone off when I'm out so I can properly disconnect, plus I'm winding down my phone dependency in general.

Something to point and shoot would be nice, but I'm potentially interested in learning a bit about using some actual camera techniques.

 

I don't have an id, I just thought they were cool.

 

I've got some determined leghorn pullets that I'm hoping to keep free range, but they are really getting good at flying now. I'm going to run an electric wire over the top of my fence so that they can't perch up there and plot their escape. Does anyone have experience with electric fencing and chickens?

I'm worried if I buy a normal kit it will be juiced up for horses and the like and I'll end up harming the hens. If there are recommendations for energizers that would be great too.

 

I was thinking today how cool it would be to live in a community that restricted technology to things no later than 2010.

I'm not sure exactly why but I can't think of anything after then that properly enriches my life.

If you could pick a date and create a real community around it, when would you choose?

 

I get why people don't like it, but when I scroll lemmy and see a post which looks like it has a decent level of engagements I'm finding an endless stream of replies that are always the same.

"Is this ai?" "Looks like it might be ai" "Ai slop" "This is ai, look at the [feature]"

Communities should set a rule to allow ai or not. Allowing ai but it must be declared could be a decent approach.

If there isn't a rule in the community that prohibits ai, I really wish people would cool it.

 

I've hatched 6 eggs and got 2 roosters. I was thinking about keeping one if I can manage the noise and agree with my neighbours.

If I do go ahead, how do I deal with the inbreeding thing? I assume he is probably going to try mate with his sisters... Obviously I wouldn't hatch any of those eggs, but is it normal to just allow that kind of weirdness in the flock?

 

I had a small flock of 3 hens who all got along once the pecking order was figured out.

One day, a lower hen became broody and I allowed her to hatch a clutch of eggs. This broodyness made her a bit defensive and caused some issues with the top hen.

Once the eggs hatched I separated her and her chicks to a nursery space away from the other hens until I felt they were old enough to free range, ~4 weeks. I didn't move her while nesting because I was afraid of breaking her broodyness.

Gradually she became less and less protective and has now returned to laying eggs. The chicks are independent approaching 8 weeks, although still attached to the mother hen. They are still roosting/nesting separately to the other hens in the nursery coop.

When the bullying happens now, she submits immediately to the lead hen and has no protective urges for the chicks.

The issue is that the top hen isn't letting up and I'm concerned about what happens when the chicks become too big to fit in the nursery coop and everyone needs to roost together.

I've seen some recommendations to separate the one being bullied for awhile, others to separate the bully and others to let things play out. One thing I was potentially going to wait out was for the rooster chick(s) to grow up enough to police the hen fighting.

Any other suggestions here?

 

Do school kids still belt that out in assembly?

 

The knowledge of what these actually are, appears to have been lost to the ages. A modern tragedy equivalent to the burning of the library of Alexandria.

 

I have a load of filters set up on my feed, notably I don't want to see Trump or Elon.

Due to recent events, so much content is coming through that it is as if I don't have filters at all.

If the text or title doesn't include the key words, it can't be filtered. All the screenshots or posts with jokes or bad titles can't be filtered.

I think the only way proper filters could be achieved is with a separate 'tags' field that could be added to or voted on by community members.

This might all seem like a lot of effort, but feed filters are such a good feature that I think it would be worth it.

I don't want unreasonable perfection for the filters, but the system seems too flawed at the moment.

I have no idea where this kind of discussion or decision would be made so I'm just throwing it out as a question here.

 

There are lots of issues I have with them in terms of privacy, but I'm going to be very specific in asking about a certain situation and would prefer to stay on that topic if possible.

I have seen someone showing AI glasses which allow the wearer to cheat at chess. The glasses provide the wearer with computer engine moves, essentially making them unbeatable against even the strongest grand masters.

How can someone prevent this from happening, for example in a tournament match?

I don't consider this as being an issue at the highest level of professional play, but for club and casual players they might not have the resources to deal with this.

Currently the camera and/or screen information might be fairly obvious just by looking, but assuming technology improves this could become harder to detect.

Retrospectively, it would be easy to spot a cheater and correct results, however this still spoils things by having the cheating in the first place.

It isn't realistic to ask people to play without glasses, and I'm not aware of any way to stop cameras or ai from functioning.

So what can be done, if anything?

view more: next ›