HumanPenguin

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

A field. The thing to remember. Llangollen is unlike most canals in the UK. It is used to move water so actually has a current. Meaning way more water would be in that field then just that stored between 2 locks.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Note: This is in no way me supporting the gov. Just considering the thought process.

While the gov seems not to care about public opinion.

It seems likely drawing that conclusion and banning a well known person. May be such a bad move even Starmer was hesitant. His option likely were.

Allow her in. Knowing she will protest. At least he can jail her.

Reject her where she will still protest and have huge access to the media while explaining the UKs argument.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago

Real question is. If the farm is a business. Then why are farmers refusing to place the land in the LTD.

Answer because this is already taxed in a different way to non property owning businesses.

So yep farm owners are all makeing a choice. They are trying to save tax on a operational basis. And now that choice means they choose to lose the value when they die. As a LTD would be an independent entity and passed without personal taxation. Much like a trust dose.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

Utter rubbish.

Officer attacking victim on the ground was attacked as a form of defence.

In no fucking way shape or form is that terrism. And in no way do police have immunity to violent attacks on protestors. do not spread your propaganda and lies using my posts.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Can't have capatalism owned companies. Being shown up by local councils.

Come on give some care for the poor abusive billionaires.

The basic argument as put by the minister.

We can't have corporate employees seeing council workers treated better then them.

Absolutely no comment about actual work load Vs quality of service. Just what folks not treated as well might think.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 4 points 5 days ago

Same place he puts promises to pay his contactors.

And anyone dumb enough to continue to follow someone with such a history of broken promises.

Up his arse

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Not sure they are required to have a coherent view on the solution.

As the complaint is that the prisoners are being treated like terrorists. For comiting property damage. At a time when their org was in no way classed as terrorists.

The hypocrisy of solutions is part of the point of the complaint. IE they should not be treated the way they are. So folks objecting to the treatment have zero requirement to define a solution that allows the gov to continue to treat them that way.

Put bluntly novaras claim is they demands are.

Stop calling protesters terrorist's. Stop supporting genocide. And treat them based on the crime they committed. Property damage.

The government choice is to agree to this. Or suffer the media backlash of their actions.

The idea "Their options are let them die or force feed them”. is just a totally false statement.

Their job is to point that falsehood out. Not provide a solution that allows the gov to continue abuse.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Was still typing. Sorry

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

USA Citizens have no process to throw him out. Only Congress or the senate can.

As for raising up and revolting. That will be as effective as errm. Let's say "using a tiny navy to support oil tankers against the worlds biggest navy" IE it just looks like a protest. Note his move to send red state national guards into blue state cities. Dispite their violence crime being lower then red states. And his call to call any protesters terrorist's.

It could be argued Civil war is just a matter of a change of words.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah. If you read right wing media. Conference looked like a mess.

If you actually re,e,ner it is a democratic member led party setting up its own rules.

Then it just looked like any other collection of disagreeing voters.

Media accusing founding ,e,bers of boycotting a conference. While interviewing her at the conference where she was not expected to speak the next day.

Because she expressed a negative opinion.

Unsurprisingly what is by any other parties standards a absolute success. Looks like a disaster to those not involved.

If you have been to any others parties conference. Lack of media give a shit. is the only difference is how much disagreement you see,

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Most disorganised. If you totally ignore all of party history.

Honestly to look at the last 14 years of government and see YP as the most disorganised. Due to a few disagreements that were resolved in weeks.

Means you really are just listening to the ,edias views and not looking at the actual events.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

Atkinson hyperledgable. Made by the RNIB.

I'm visually impaired and it really helps.

It is also a good font in general for easy reading.

There is also a next version. Little more modern looking and a mono version.

 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/36715191

Her post indicates that her and JC are in touch and working together to continue the roadmap as published.

IE the conference etc is still planned for November.

 

Her post indicates that ger and JC are in touch and working together to continue the roadmap as published.

IE the conference etc is still planned for November.

 

Our Party open letter to Founders and supporters.

Asking for signatures to convince both J Corbyn and Z Sultana to step back and allow a member lead team to take over.

The MPs got us this far. It's time for the people to take the reins.

Z Sultana announced she supported the movement this morning.

https://feddit.uk/pictrs/image/e43777dd-8c26-4162-a6d7-2395415ef40f.webp

 

This is no more then an opinion. But I would be interested in others view of it.

If we believe ZS and her supporters internal to the process.

What is happening to YP is very similar to tumers from when JC was leading labour. We saw evidence of internal attacks from the right in 2019. But tumers of his supporters infighting and trying to take control were common before then.

I think I and many members from that time put them down to the right string trouble. But I'm now starting to wonder.

Corbyn made a effort to move labour more democratic and membership led right from the start. Continuing from eds reduction in union power.

Given ZS claims and other insiders reports to the guardian etc.

Is it likely that the right had help from left PLP under labour. And those same MPs and union leaders are using their history with Corbyn to embed control early into the YP set up.

Added to multiple comments we have seen throughout YP communities on social media. Indicating distrust in the whole idea of a membership lead control.

Is the idea something the left is willing to fight for.

2
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by HumanPenguin@feddit.uk to c/yourparty@feddit.uk
 

This is very much interpreted from multiple emails and news articles.

So is opinion. But as I shared the membership portal. And it has been accused of being fake, I should share my opinion.

Supporters have received an email from YourParty.Uk saying the membership site was not official.

But another email from Zahah Sultana suggest she sent the email and set up the site I shared. News articles agree that she is indeed suggesting other MPs are trying to freeze her out of the process. I have emailed her directly for confirmation. But expect a delay to answers.

The claim seems to be that the roadmap emails were sent without her (or by some interpretations). Jeremys approval. Dispite this being a requirement of the initial founding in July.

She seems to indicate other independent MPs are trying to freeze her out of the process. And she set up the membership site to support the roadmap. While ensuring members were involved in the process.

My opinion is nothing more then that. So you guys will need to decide for yourselfs. But I am of the opinion the membership we signed up to are in her control. Rather then a random stranger. And will wait to see if other evidence supports her claims that independent MPs that have claimed to support the party are potentially causing trouble before members can prevent it.

 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/36515736

link https://www.yourparty-membership.uk/

From membership site.

Membership now open!

Today is the day. Our membership portal is now open.

For too long, Britain’s politics has been run in the interests of the rich and powerful. From Ayr to Aberystwyth, our new party is about changing that - taking power back for working people, communities and future generations.

Joining isn’t just about signing up. It means taking part in a founding process that is genuinely democratic and member-led.

This is your chance to help build something new. A party that belongs to its members, not the establishment.

Solidarity

 

link https://www.yourparty-membership.uk/

From membership site.

Membership now open!

Today is the day. Our membership portal is now open.

For too long, Britain’s politics has been run in the interests of the rich and powerful. From Ayr to Aberystwyth, our new party is about changing that - taking power back for working people, communities and future generations.

Joining isn’t just about signing up. It means taking part in a founding process that is genuinely democratic and member-led.

This is your chance to help build something new. A party that belongs to its members, not the establishment.

Solidarity

8
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by HumanPenguin@feddit.uk to c/raspberry_pi@programming.dev
 

Hi. Just to make things clear. My reason for trying this is I am visually impaired.

I am writing some code to run on a pi zero 2. With a small 5 inch screen. IE the code interface is being designed to display very clear large buttons on a small screen.

To set up the OS build, I am trying to create a Qemu emulator on my large screened home desktop. So I can actually read code file system etc in large print. Once I have the OS set up and can install a lite image with very minimal xwindows / tkinter support. I can then use SsH etc to work on the GPIo stuff.

My issue is I have no experience with QEMU. I am having issues finding any online guide using recent versions of QemuEtc (preferably not video as watching code/CLI on YouTube is just undoable with vision issue's.)

If anyone can help with a guide on how to set up qemu_system_aarch64 for raspi2ap

IE what exactly I need to do to provide a -kernal and IMG etc to build a image. I'd be very grateful.

I'm posting here hoping you guys will have some experience. But please let me know if somewhere else would be better.

My desktop is running Debian bookworm with a back ports version of QEMU.

 

For anyone joining Your Party or interested in the ideals etc.

Gary's Economics is a very good channel to watch. The guy really knows his stuff.

He is doing a good job of pushing the data and obvious risk of economic inequality on social media.

This link is not the best first one, I'd recommend spending time watching his understanding wealth series. He dose a very good job of pointing out why the current inequality happened etc.

LINK BELOW.

https://youtu.be/bReS9FLpgT4

But this video cross posted is a good indication of the work ahead for YourParty before the next election. it is going to take time and funding to form a good wealth tax policy. And the Party should start soon after the 1st conference.

8
Community Advice (feddit.uk)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by HumanPenguin@feddit.uk to c/yourparty@feddit.uk
 

As you are new to this. Thought more experienced may want a place to offer friendly advice.

First it is common to post rules for communities in the side bar. Normally just behaivior type things. Look at a few other communities on political parties and use what you feel in appropriate.

As the community grows. You may want to find folks you trust and ask them to help mod the group. This is mainly folks with the authority to delete posts that break said rules. Multiple people help limit the time offensive nsfw or outright advertising like posts (assuming they are rules you want. NSFW is required by feddit.uk as are a few others.) are up and causing issues.

Feddit UK really is a fairly good space people wise, but Any political forum attracts fecal exit points.

Others may have more ideas.

view more: next ›