Lastangel

"look alright I'm sorry about the petty fraud thing but I was a victim of sexism. They wouldn't let me have equal access to the accounts, which can only be explained by an old boys club (look I said I'm sorry about the fraud thing, alright?!)"

I was ready for another smear campaign, so at this point it seems obvious that this whole fiasco is a media set-up. Either ZS is a hostile plant playing the long game to discrete the left, or the email list has been hacked and all this is coming from Russian bots.

We've clearly passed the stage of things needing to be realistic or evidenced, I give up. This is a deliberate farce to test the faithful, Davids Attenborough and Bowie founded the party and are taking to announce their little jest soon, musk is lashing out on anger because he only has weeks to live after being infected by a rat bite, and those surgery rumours about Zuckerberg are true.

It doesn't matter. I'm going to do all the right things and follow the rules, but nobody can stop me concocting am alternative reality and it's going to be more ridiculous and imaginative every time I see nonsense like this.

If we make it as a country, probably invest in the mental health market. I suspect it'll have a lot of business

So peacefully projecting an unedited picture that doesn't breach anyone's privacy or spill any secrets, is 'malicious communication'.

And telling thousands of rioters-in-waiting that they need to 'kill or be killed' isn't.

We're all eager to see the quality of letters you've written to the Prime minister with your urgent plans to save national security.

And you needn't worry about posting it here, because I doubt anyone (else) would find bizarre flaws to pick at in an achievement they could never really hope to achieve. That would be statistically unlikely.

Boycotts aren't effective alone. Neither is one person deciding to vote for the other party. Telling your boss 'Uh, no, I'm not going to do that, that's illegal and immoral and probably a war crime or something' is not actually effective. Sure, I could switch providers or go sailing the high seas but that won't eradicate fascism, so why bother?

So I guess the only solutions are 1, carry right on supporting, validating, and participating in any bad practice or evil that comes your way, 2, some hitherto undiscovered way to Stop Evil in one fell stroke, or 3, engage in change as a process, on the understanding that the bad guys are hopefully not the only type of people who can work together to get shit done over a longer timeframe than 'now or never'.

I'm going for 3, because frankly if there aren't enough decent people in my community to put in a fraction of the effort the dangerous idiots are putting in, it's not worth saving. And I can't be bothered to do the whole 'judging myself, my family and friends and neighbours and country and society and finding it wanting' at the moment, so it's easier to just do what little good I can, wherever I see the chance

This week has passed in about 24 hours. I swear it's still July, maybe August. I don't wish to alarm anyone, but I think there's something wrong with the passage of time.

(Why yes, I am getting old, why do you ask?)

Fun thought experiment: have you ever met anyone who has replied to opinion polls?

I asked my dear 80 year old mother that a while ago, she hadn't. I haven't.

They are generally conducted by phone, cold calling landlines, or by someone going door to door with a clipboard.

Many unofficial (but still very influencial, including gov.uk) polls are online, and users have to complete hundreds of them to get a nominal payment, £5 I believe.

Now imagine the sort of person who answers their ringing landline/ door and says 'why yes, stranger, yes I do have 10 minutes to discuss my voting intentions', and you have the entire 'over 40 years old' demographic represented in these results.

Imagine someone who has actively sought out survey websites and sits though at least 100, over 6 months or so, for a tiny amount of pocket money - or even weirder, someone who just decided to do it anyway - and you have the entire 'under 40 years old' demographic in these results.

And now, thinking of those door-answerers and survey-clickers, imagine how colourful and exciting their lives must be, and then ask yourself what possible incentive they have to tell the truth when absolutely nobody will ever know if they liven up the tedium slightly by claiming to be a 45 year old self made millionaire with 12 lovely children all planning to vote Jedi in the next election.

And that is why opinion polls always come out way, way more fringe than the reality ever is. Because normal people do not answer them unless they have a strong opinion or an incentive, and those with an incentive generally have no incentive to be honest.

(For reference, I'm not dunking on people who have done these things. I spent about a year answering yougov surveys until it dawned on me that it worked out at less than 5p an hour. If you're bored or just want to contribute to the national knowledge pool, awesome, but you probably already know you're not exactly an average voter)

we aim to reflect voices in the UK proportionally to current voting intention

Was there a national poll that I don't recall? Because the last one I was aware of, a majority of people voted Labour, and the BBC have never, ever been pro-labour. Maybe they're claiming that tons of people intended to vote for Farage and co but couldn't figure out how ballots work, which is remotely credible, but it would take some serious research to back that up so I don't think that's it.

How on earth are they claiming to know people's voting intentions in the first place, let alone the rather groundbreaking idea that the election was wrong.

This has a worrying air of the Trump style, post-truth 'any official, scientific, pro-equality and / or leftie information is fake news' that we saw before trump was elected. I remember being amazed that a public figure could so blatantly, confidently lie about important constitutional processes and not be arrested for - Idk but if fraud, libel, aiding and abetting, misrepresentation etc are crimes, then misleading an entire country to disenfranchise them and mis-sell a political position must be quite serious.

We are all legally obliged to pay the BBC if we want to watch live news. That is quasi-governmental, and hella powerful. If I want to watch live TV in this country and don't want to pay to fund a corporation that's flagrantly misrepresenting the existence/ validity of an actual national election, I kinda feel there should be more recourse than 'Dear Sir / Madam, we have received your complaint and will take it on board if and when we ever have the slightest reason to'.

The BBC are telling the world that most people in the UK 'intend' to vote for Farage. That is not just untrue, or biased, or impossible for them to know. It's such an absurd claim that I think the scariest part is the fact that they are getting away with it.