this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
889 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

9179 readers
2919 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psoul@lemmy.world 3 points 24 minutes ago (1 children)

This but for the police force.

Turn the police into something of a militia, 80% made of constituents from that jurisdiction, picked at random à la jury duty (exemptions apply)

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

That is a terrible idea. You already see what happens when they’re “trained”.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 minutes ago

They’ve circled so far around they aren’t even on the left anymore.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

I'd like to see billionaires do this work.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago* (last edited 16 minutes ago)

I arguably hate Maoism the most of all popular authoritarian left ideologies. So it makes sense to me that irredeemably evil and stupid conservatives and fascists would unconsciously like it's policies.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 hours ago

Are we also nationalizing the farms?

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The reds have actually taken over our country.

We need to stop Chairman Trump, the communist who hates America and want to destroy our freedom and our way of life.

(can we just call the MAGAts "communist"? seems like a more potent word in this 21st century red scare era)

[–] Part4@infosec.pub 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

What Trump is doing has nothing to do with communism. It is raw naked capitalism, whose end game appears to be oligarchy, aligning itself with fascism rather than accept an egalitarian society in which it has to give up any of its advantage.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

One thing you gotta know about politics, is you have to use "fascism" when your audience is on the left, but for conservatives, "communism" is a much scarier word so you should use that instead. Its basically code-switching in order to get your point across. The average people are too dumb to understand nuances so you have to dumb it down for them to understand.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 2 hours ago

*Squints harder*

Ah, slavery.

But schools place way too much emphasis on academic results. You can be the smartest man alive, but you'll still be paying the "school thicko" to fix your toilet.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 14 points 3 hours ago

All "right wing" farmers parties are just agrarian socialists with racism and sexism.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 hours ago

LOL, MAGA Communists.

[–] lmagitem@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Cue Fortunate Son

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Don't get caught wearing glasses around maga.... Wouldn't wanna get called a "reader"

[–] Juice@midwest.social 16 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Bourgeois conservatives are obsessed with 20th century communism. The billionaire class has had its own vanguard since Prescott Bush. Steve Bannon calls himself a Leninist, though I'm not real sure what he means. The Republican obsession with culture war is influenced by Gramsci and his theory of hegemonic power. And the republican strategy of politically controlling cities through rural areas, as in "the country surrounds the city," is a component of Maoism.

Not saying there is an affinity between far right conservatives and communists, I don't believe that there is one. But 20th century communists' application of dialectical materialism uncovered new political dynamics through their work with the masses, and unfortunately the far right learned many of these lessons, though only as a way to gain power for themselves noy liberation for all; while democrats clung death like to liberal idealism and refused to learn anything from the left whose job it is to oppose and keep from power.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago

Nah I wouldn’t call it communism. They want slavery. The “good ones” own the land. And the libs are the slaves. That is their ideal world.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

They're obsessed with selling the idea of 20th century communism without that label while practicing 19th century robber-baron-ism. They can be kings and gods and then sell everyone else the tools to chase the next ideal. Because ultimately all they have is brand loyalty, fear, and a lack of any other options keeping farmers with them.

Back in 2016 Trey Crowder and 2 other comedian friends wrote a book called the Liberal Redneck Manifesto. As someone that grew up redneck, it was probably the best assessment of the situation in 2016 I've seen so far, and the media missed it 100%. The ultimate lesson is that until it affects the under-educated and they think they chose the alternative, they will continue to act against their own best interests because "That's how it's done." Same exact thing applies to the developing world.

Then J.D. Vance and his stupid book came in and swept the scene with his mediocre drivel that made coastal liberal elites feel like now they understood how Trump won. Still pisses me off how joyously out of touch they were as they fueled the fire that got us here.

Steve Bannon calls himself a Leninist, though I'm not real sure what he means.

I mean fascist have "socialism" if you consider their party members alone to represent the state. That's why fascist economics can be difficult to grasp for a lot of people, especially capitalists.

Yes the Nazi seized the means of production.... But, the way they did it was by seizing businesses not controlled by the party and then incentivizing loyalty by re-privatizing the businesses back to loyal party members.

People like Bannon cannot see the difference between the people seizing the means of production to serve greater society, and the party seizing the means of production to serve the party itself. To them socialism is when government take business, and that's it.

And the republican strategy of politically controlling cities through rural areas, as in "the country surrounds the city," is a component of Maoism.

I don't really think that's entirely correct considering that the 3/5th compromise was basically set up to do the same thing in America, and the idea of a Senate itself was invented as a way to avoid the same situation early American leaders witnessed in the French revolution.

I think maoism is a bit of a twist on the tradition, as class consciousness in China was fermented in the rural plurality unlike in Western nations which tend to take a more vanguard approach to socialism.

[–] CriticalThought@lemmy.world 38 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Under this plan, would the farms be nationalized, or would people be forced to work for the profit of private farm owners?

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 14 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Free labor.

Gavin McInnes even said teenagers should be primarily used for this. This will also be the case when you realize how much child labor laws are being removed by Republicans.

[–] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Free profits for the agriculture industry.

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Wait until private equity firms get in on this and find a way to buy and gut farms and their assets while also profiting of the "free labour". You're gonna love this.

[–] Patches@ttrpg.network 26 points 6 hours ago

You already know

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 36 points 6 hours ago

Nationalized industry that always produces food at cost and pays all of its workers well and fairly would be a great idea so long as the people setting it up aren't completely untrustworthy fucks.

Oh wait

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 4 points 4 hours ago
[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Calling a single policy Maoist because it was implemented by the Maoist regime is the same as calling the concept of socialised healthcare a Nazi policy because it was implemented by the Nazi regime.

I neither agree nor disagree with this policy on the basis that I don't know enough about the logistics and implementation to give an informed opinion, but to refer to it as Maoist is glib and incorrect as Malaysia, Zambia and Nigeria already have agricultural national service and, although Malaysia is a communist country, none of them are aligned with the CCP or the Maoist Revolutionary movement.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Its basically a parody of how every right leaning idiot calls boring right leaning centrists like Democrats "Extreme Left Communism".

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 hours ago

Yes, it's a funny tweet, not a political science essay. It's OK.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 49 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Real farmer here(who has never voted red). I don't trust the average American not to completely fuck up any harvest and not to bitch constantly about the heat or dirt. It's bad enough hearing people who work in AC complain about the heat to me.

[–] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I worked on an assembly line making CV joints. The inner and outer races had a numbering system based on measured size. The outer races were honed, and there would be size variations we would have to keep adjusting for. 4 inners go with 4 outers, 5 inners with 5 outers and so on. 4 was the most common.

One shift, on a Saturday, one of the workers used 4s for everything. Some were failing, inspection at the end of the line, but a lot didn't. Well, then the 4s ran out. Since that is the most common size, we were down. She intentionally ran us out of parts by building things wrong, potentially making scrap or defective drive train parts because she didn't want to work on Saturday.

Her job, that she applied for and took, knowing there are times when would have to work weekends. A job with a good union and Healthcare.

I can only imagine the kind of employees you'd get by forcing them to work the fields, for I'm going to guess way less than UAW wages. In the sun. I think you'd see a lot of sabotaged equipment or crops.

[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Not trying to justify her or anything, but companies do love to abuse shit.

Yes, being expected to occasionally work overtime is a reasonable expectation.

However, most companies will just keep doing it. Im sorry, if I have to work overtime almost every single shift for more than 2 weeks - that is not reasonable. (And that shit happens even with unions)

Seriously, this person is making CV joints. It's not like they are a doctor or a firefighter. I don't see the urgency. This world needs to chill.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 6 hours ago

I spent my teens working on farms (labour intensive vegetables) and can confirm. Every spring we’d have a few crew from last year, and new ones; even in gorgeous spring weather people would last a couple days before quitting. And it’s not difficult, but it requires attention to detail, which some people either don’t have or don’t care to have.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

American citizens can't afford to live on farm wages.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 8 points 5 hours ago

Huh. Well what if we built areas with housing and transit cheap enough that farm wages are enough to live on?

[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 27 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

So... Slavery with more steps?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›