this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
186 points (96.5% liked)

Today I Learned

24796 readers
174 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://en.wikipedia.org/?useskin=cologneblue

According to the documentation, it's been there since 2002!

It looks fine at 800x600 with RetroZilla.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's proper information density. Looks almost like a japanese web page.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago

the standard wikipedia skin is plenty information dense, while also actually being readable.

yes i'm cranky because the glorification of the old web is largely nostalgia and completely ignores things like accessibility

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (3 children)

TIL: The Internet I grew up with is absolute bonkers.

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Internet we live with now is no less bonkers and nearing utter unusability.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Both true, but for totally different reasons, right.

Early Internet was kinda bonkers because it was disconnected and unregulated and anonymous and nobody yet understood UX design so every site was different, yet always cluttered and overwhelming.

Modern Internet is bonkers because UX patterns and user behaviour is so understood and homogenised that every site is basically the same simplified interface, along with the same dark patterns that manipulate user behaviour to maximise corporate profit, rather than trying to give users what they actually want.

The old type of bonkers was far more preferable.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Pretty sure they mean bonkers in a pleasantly surprised way

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

i mean yeah, it's like comparing the first car to a modern kei car, there's been some obvious improvements despite the fact that most cars are oversized and way too sleek

the early web looks like shit, the standard modern website is hidden behind 4 layers of ads, but a modern website that isn't shittified is pretty fucking great.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, this was sort of the "corporate-ish" color scheme and web design template back then for websites. Tons of things looked like this. Facebook looked like this for a decade or more. Large banner images took too long to load and this looked "professional" because it looked like corporate letterhead.

Xerox used red, but similar layout to some degree.

IBM's website in 2002

Random website from 2002

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Additionally, it looks a lot like Friendster's default.

(Hope you're well, ol' Tom. Wherever you are. 🥲🖖🏼)

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I imagine they had slightly fewer languages listed back in 2002!

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I adore the blessed people who write up the Simple English entries.

Here's the opening paragraph from Quantum Mechanics in Simple English:

Quantum mechanics explains how the universe works with things that are even smaller than atoms. It is also called quantum physics or quantum theory. Mechanics is the part of physics that explains how things move and quantum is the Latin word for 'how much'. A quantum of energy is the least amount possible (or the least extra amount), and quantum mechanics describes how that energy moves.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is what LLMs are taking from us, and I say this without a shred of irony

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Difficult explanations of complex subjects that may not be aligned with the statistical word pattern distribution of the corpus of a dead web.

It’s not impossible that this exact paragraph could be generated. But it was more likely crafted by someone who both understands the subject matter on a comfortable level at the very least, and who understands what parts of it are intuitive enough to create a scaffolding of knowledge that are distinctive to this topic.

I don’t think I could have come up with anything that doesn’t use the word iota a half dozen times and then falling backwards on myself trying to get across the idea of how energy could not exist in measures that are not multiples of a minimum iota of energy (and explaining that it’s just how it is, no I don’t know how that was measured, etcetera etcetera)

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

I do miss having languages listed on the side by default. I felt like it gave some depth to how important or culturally isolated a subject can be. For example, a short article available in 30 major languages, a long article available in 30 major languages, and a long article only available in like 3 languages would all feel just a little different.

English is not my native language and a lot of subjects I like (or fixations I may have, knowing Wikipedians) just exist in the realm of English. So these long long pages that don’t exist in many languages have a particular vibe to them.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"absolute bonkers" Looks like a readable well designed web page

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 week ago
[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Finally, some good fucking website

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 9 points 1 week ago

Do you know what bonkers means?

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago

How is this "bonkers" exactly???

It looks fine. What qualifies it as absolute bonkers?

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

TIL Wikipedia has skins

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Neat

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fediverse?useskin=cologneblue

If you're on mobile, set it to desktop else it looks weird

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I've ever heard the term "bonkers" used in that way before.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

They're trying to make it happen... ~fuckit. why not.~

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Pretty cool. Everyone can't seem to get that "bonkers" can be a good thing

Also super neat that Retrozilla exists.

Verdana all the things!

Member when the Internet wasn't profitized? Member when popups were only on porn and warez sites?

It's beautiful

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago

this and monobook is awesome.