288
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by ijeff to c/android

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] somegadgetguy 275 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

2021 - Apple collects more types of data than Google https://www.tomsguide.com/news/android-ios-data-collection

2021 - Apple Do Not Track basically a placebo button https://www.techdirt.com/2021/12/10/apples-do-not-track-button-is-privacy-theater/

2022 - Apple tracking you despite your privacy settings https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-analytics-tracking-even-when-off-app-store-1849757558

2023 - All the Data Apple Tracks on You (Privacy guides amount to roughly 70,000 words of legalese) https://www.wired.com/story/apple-privacy-data-collection/

2023 - MAC address "filtering" has basically been broken since launch https://www.zdnet.com/article/iphone-users-who-dont-want-to-be-tracked-need-apples-ios-17-1-privacy-patch/

Apple still links services like device bricking to the Find My network. If your iphone is stolen, and you don't want someone to reset it to use or sell, you HAVE to submit your location data to be a part of the tracker network. Disabling that, Apple sends users a scary nag email that their device is no longer protected.

[-] adam_b@infosec.pub 76 points 6 months ago

I love how you took the time to write the years and title of the event... 😁😆😊🤍

Wish there was a website or a wiki that document all this, these companies are basically using philosophical fallacies as a marketing strategy at this point

[-] flipht@kbin.social 27 points 6 months ago

100%. Most business is just advanced sophistry at this point. Marketing and advertising serves a useful purpose for new products, when the market isn't aware that it exists.

But by quantity and cost, most advertising is just social manipulation and is effectively an extra drain on the economy.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 6 months ago

And that's just the last three years!

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 135 points 6 months ago

Apple is 100% correct. It's the entire reason Android exists.

Then again, Apple also does a fair bit of data collection. I hate that Apple has been able to market themselves as some kind of bastion of privacy. They aren't.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 54 points 6 months ago

Apple is 100% correct. It’s the entire reason Android exists.

Then again, Apple also does a fair bit of data collection. I hate that Apple has been able to market themselves as some kind of bastion of privacy. They aren’t.

So Apple is not 100% correct. They are 50% correct because the second half of their claim is that Apple is somehow different and not tracking its users...

[-] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 months ago

When the pot calls the kettle black, it is technically correct.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 6 months ago

Actually, the reason Android exists isn't so one-dimensional.

  • The company Android was initially concerned more with Microsoft dominating phones like they did computers at the time, before being bought by Google
  • They created two prototype chains initially, one touch, one that was more akin to BlackBerry
  • iPhone came out, they ditched the BlackBerry-esque one and focused on what became now Android

Google was mostly just doing what all tech companies were doing at the time, trying to compete in a mobile arms race for dominance. The data tracking was just a bonus. Appeasing shareholders is paramount. Look at how Apple created an Alexa speaker just because they had to as another example of this type of behavior.

Also, Apple actually has a long history of tracking user behavior that predates both Android and the iPhone.

Apple apps since some time shortly after the inception of OS X would (and likely still do) phone home to configuration.apple.com to send apple metrics on usage. Earlier variations of LittleSnitch could actually block this collection behavior.

Apple has since reconfigured the network stack to guarantee that direct encrypted connections to Apple are always possible above any VPN, or other type of network filter connection. So there's no way to prevent communication with Apple on an Apple product at all now short of keeping it off the Internet or blocking DNS to 17.* IP addresses, which would only work on a network one has control over.

[-] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago

I believe the reason Google acquired Android was to make sure that Apple didn't dominate the mobile device landscape, which would be a threat to their ad business. The data collection was just a nice side-effect, from their perspective.

[-] Nath@aussie.zone 9 points 6 months ago

I think you underestimate how early Google acquired Android. In 2005, Apple wasn't even in the mobile device market. Nokia were the dominant handset in those days.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

All cell phones are tracking devices. Unless you faraday cage them. But yes, both apple and Android phones give out way more information than just that. And I definitely would not say that I would trust Apple more with data that I would Google.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Anti_Weeb_Penguin@sh.itjust.works 95 points 6 months ago

Yeah yeah, wake me up when you can unlock the bootloader on apple phones.

[-] brax@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago

Yup, the logic people use to call Apple phones secure would put Fisher Price toy phones at the S-Tier of security.

[-] Substance_P@lemmy.world 67 points 6 months ago

Is Apple trying to convince me that the Health app, Apple maps or Siri doesn't track me?

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

Is Apple trying to convince me that the Health app, Apple maps or Siri doesn’t track me?

No, they are trying to convince themselves. It's an internal brainwashing presentation after all, not for external PR.

[-] ijeff 20 points 6 months ago

Their slide seems to list Siri, Maps, and iAd not being tied to the user's Apple ID as a pro. I didn't realize this was the case.

[-] Uprise42@artemis.camp 18 points 6 months ago

Apple has very explicitly stated in very clear terms that the health app does not share data with other apps or devices unless you give permission. And as someone who has given that permission (twice, once to give a meal tracker write permission and once to link to my doctors office’s application for read and write) it’s for every application. It’s not a “hey you need to let everyone have access or no one”. You can get fairly granular.

There’s always the possibility of lying but usually when a company goes that hard on saying the same thing is so many different ways it’s legit. They don’t commit like that unless they know they won’t get in trouble. Those kinds of statements could open them to false advertising claims if it got out they were taking your health data.

Here’s a link to their privacy document which reviewed a good bit of info: https://www.apple.com/privacy/docs/Health_Privacy_White_Paper_May_2023.pdf

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] kokesh@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago

One damn iPhone in my home network makes most calls home out of anything in my home network. I cn see it in AdGuard Home log.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago

Yeah, but Android doesn't make me constantly enter my password to do basic things. Also, Apple takes away a lot of control from their consumers.

I'll take the phone that isn't dumbed down tyvm

[-] ijeff 38 points 6 months ago

Ideally you shouldn't have to compromise. GrapheneOS without Google is an option.

[-] 520@kbin.social 10 points 6 months ago

It literally isn't - Graphene only supports Google Pixel phones.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

You've apparently missed the point. Graphene exists solely to harden security and privacy by disabling the googly parts of the phone. That is clearly what was meant by "without Google"

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 30p87@feddit.de 39 points 6 months ago

Buying or updating an app requires system-wide sign in

Only if one uses the official play store. Which apple does not understand, ofc.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 months ago

~~does not understand~~

Does not want to understand

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago

Oh irony, thy name is Apple.

[-] spaxxor@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 22 points 6 months ago
[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

They are not wrong

The best lies have a bit of truth in them, by making a factual statement and then deliberately coming to a wrong conclusion. They are wrong when the second half of the claim is that Apple is somehow any different. There is tracking and analytics everywhere in Apple systems. They don't need to formally tie the Apple ID to other tracking methods when they can just use other means to find out that two connections come from the same device.

At least in the Android world there at least is the option to go fully free of Google Services. There is no iOS Open Source Project that includes everything but a few things.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Auzy@beehaw.org 22 points 6 months ago

I used to sell apple gear at a reseller. They literally used to send messages to our customers for applecare.

The difference is that Apple simply uses the data for it's own benefit and competes against everyone (including people developing for their system)

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] books@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

Google, the famous advertising company is using its hardware,software and infrastructure to watch everything we are doing?

I'm shocked.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Apple, ruthlessly opposing standards any time it can make them a buck no matter how many people have to suffer the consequences.

I'm shocked.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NessD@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

"only when it provides a better customer service" Hahaha. That's so vague that it is completely meaningless.

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 17 points 6 months ago

Yes, but if you put graphene on a pixel it's miles beyond an iphone

[-] mindlight@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

Congratulations to you and the other 0.000000001% of Android users then.

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

0.000000001%

This implies the existence of 100 billion Android users, that is roughly 13 times the number of people alive.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 16 points 6 months ago

They're not wrong. Its just they aren't the perfect solution

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JWBananas@startrek.website 14 points 6 months ago

Clearly this was before Apple became one of the largest advertising companies.

[-] interolivary@beehaw.org 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Well, it's not like Apple doesn't also collect pretty hair-raising information on you. Go digging through some of the sqlite databases on your machine and you'll find eg. a social graph that even supports labels for things like political affiliations (I think this db was the one used by their ominously named "intelligence platform" service). Another db (which I think was for the knowledged daemon) has an incredibly detailed log of everything you do on your computer and phone, including eg. web URLs and millisecond granularity events on when you interact with your devices. Whether that social graph or all that other stuff ever leaves your devices is unknown (although eg. the knowledged stuff definitely does since I can see events for my phone on my laptop), but I wouldn't count on it not being sent to Apple – regardless of what they claim.

And yeah, sure, this is all to make "customer experience" better, but do you seriously believe that's all they will be used for?

Edit: and just as a side note, I'm not basing these claims on stuff I read online, but on actually having looked at the contents of those databases myself

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

:spidermanpointing1: :spidermanpointing2:

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 months ago

was this old (the google logo is the old one so i'm not sure) or was apple just uninformed?

you can have all sorts of multiple accounts in the control panel, mail and calendar all have on device log ons, you can update apps outside of the app store or use the google play store with your google account the same way you do with your apple account.

[-] Snowplow8861@lemmus.org 12 points 6 months ago

Five words into the article says

Apple’s internal presentation from 2013

Literally at the top under TL;DR

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Lol at DoJ just releasing it, thanks I suppose.

Lol at Apple trying to wiggle its way into everything trying to fool people that they are privacy champs and everyone else using Android is a chump. I have no doubt in my mind that Apple has terabytes of data on every user. And Google maps can be used without signing in, making their argument a moot point

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] mojo@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

Closed source is always privacy invasive by default.

[-] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 6 months ago

The difference is that Google is collecting everything, while Apple can collect everything.

Also, Android is not a "device".

Android and iOS are a massive tracking operating systems. Stick to deGoogled Android and Linux on mobile.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
288 points (90.9% liked)

Android

16654 readers
275 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS