this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
893 points (99.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

9420 readers
877 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 77 points 1 month ago (4 children)

There's an xkcd about this, but I have no idea how to search for it.

[–] Toldry@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

https://xkcd.com/1301/

Alt text:

I have never been lied to by data in a .txt file which has been hand-aligned

[–] TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Aligning figures the way you want to in Latex saps all the energy that would otherwise be dedicated to lying.

[–] Denvil@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

That can't be very trustworthy, it's a png! But then if it's inaccurate does that mean png's ARE trustworthy? But then if that's the case then this is accurate in saying pngs aren't trustworthy, but that would mean that it claiming pngs are inaccurate would be inaccurate itself which would mean...

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Where would .md fit in that graph I wonder...

[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

Somewhere between .txt and .doc

[–] whimsy@lemmy.zip 63 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There must be an xkcd for this too

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is there not an XKCD for there being an XKCD about everything?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

There is not an xkcd for there not being an xkcd about this.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

the xkcd app has a pretty good search function. got any keywords we can try?

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I just remember it making a joke about if you find an old self-hosted webpage that's just text on a background with no ads, no css, etc. it's a very reliable source of information.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 69 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] bizza@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)

The only problem with that site is it burns my retinas trying to read it lol

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Screen is too bright if that happens, the easy way to set screen brightness is so a white background matches the brightness of a piece of white paper in the same area.

[–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A piece of white paper in most places also burns my retinas. Light sensitivity is a bitch.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Fair enough, I also don't like bright areas much.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

You're not squinting hard enough

[–] deadcream@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

Turn on the lights

Or just don't scroll in bed at night

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

spooky magic hands MAGIC COLOR SWAP more spooky hands

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I give you Warren Buffetts investor relations website.
https://berkshirehathaway.com/

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Honestly a static page that's literally just text, a few hyperlinks, and a few lines to prettify is like, peak design. No bullshit. A 9 year old could design the site and that's a complement.

You can run this site on a mobile phone from 2002 and it would run perfectly.

I can use my TUI based browser to use the site and have the same experience as every other user.

They've achieved a lightweight, ultra-compatible, informative site with just enough eye candy (those lines) to make the site feel at least as engaging as a newspaper.

This is brilliant, 10/10 would hire that web dev.

Edit: Single line -> lines, idk what happened my eyes shit the bed or something

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wonder how much Geico pays for that spot.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

Well, based on their commercials I'd say it has to be less than 15% of their competitors' revenue.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Probably nothing because he owns Geico, it's just self-promotion

[–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

It can even be hosted for free in AWS with nothing but a publicly accessible S3 bucket.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago

This is brilliant, 10/10 would hire that web dev.

You don't need to, you can do this on your own.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

When I was a teenager, my dad tried to impress me with the bloated website of his new employer. Unskippable propaganda flash banners, baffling organization, messy color scheme etc. He asked me what I thought and I told it was hideous and terrible. He probably thought I was being spitefully contrarian but it really was an ugly site.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Annual Meeting Information Updated July 17, 2025

chefsKiss.jpg

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It may not be pretty, but it cuts the bullshit and gets straight to the point.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 month ago

However, I have two thoughts regarding your personal expenditures that can save you real money. I'm suggesting that you call on the services of two subsidiaries of Berkshire: GEICO and Borsheim's.

I estimate that about 40% of all auto drivers in the country can save money by insuring with GEICO. The figure is not 100% because insurers differ in their underwriting judgments, with some favoring drivers who live in certain geographical areas and work in certain occupations more than GEICO does.

This is the least bullshit I've ever seen in an advertisement. Acknowledges that it's not cheaper for everyone, tells you to compare it to whatever you're currently using.

Almost makes you want to hype a billionaire. Almost.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

A straight up HTML ad for GEICO? That means I can't block it. Genius.

[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

For a sec I thought I had dimentia since all the links were purple

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How it looks on my phone. That ad sure does eat up some space.

[–] AllOutOfBubbleGum@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bufalo1973@europe.pub 6 points 1 month ago

I guess the design is the original from 1978.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I was surprised to see Shein take off the way it did. The first and only time I ever visited that site, I thought, “For sure this has to be a scam.” The layout and design set off alarm bells in my head, like sites from earlier internet days that were guaranteed to give your computer a virus.

It was wild to find out that so many people legit shop there. But I guess I’m showing my age.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Amazing that this is the first thing I see after searching it

[–] Damage@feddit.it 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It looks like AliExpress' home page

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I miss the old aliexpress, where the search wasn't a mangled mess of whoever's paying for top position and filters existed and worked (somewhat)

[–] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah you get better results with a search engine and "site:AliExpress.com"

[–] bent@feddit.dk 28 points 1 month ago

This is so true, whenever a see something that's obviously never been touched by the design department and is mostly just text I feel safe, secure and trust it by default.

Anything with flashy graphics is doubt before they prove themselves trustworthy.

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 27 points 1 month ago

I remember when a payload of 10kb was too much and a one second loading time was unacceptable.

Saas seems to have increased that to 30mb and 10 seconds. Amazing progress.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

Wikipedia used to be the go-to byword for “unreliable source”. Now it’s least unreliable source that Google’s “AI Overview” section or ChatGPT ever cites.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sounds like someone's descent into conspiracy wackjobbery

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

nah, that all lives in short form video these days.

it's the perfect format for it. just long enough to say something crazy, not long enough for you to ask questions about it.

that and social media. take this website for example. lemmy.ml and lemmygrad both have some veeeeery interesting ideas about the history of certain authoritarian governments.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›