this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
561 points (99.8% liked)

196

4362 readers
2903 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

radical for-profit “investment” in healthcare research, production, and administration makes outcomes worse, not better

not to be a raging commie but this upsets me

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago (3 children)

All that health care spending helps the GDP. Don’t you want the biggest GDP?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

Inflation helps it even more. Devaluation of the dollar makes number go up!

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Contrary to popular myth, most partners claim to prefer small or average-sized GDPs. A GDP that's too large can actually be painful or downright prohibitive.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But a fairly large throbbing, I mean thriving economy?

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago

It’s what you do with your economy.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 10 points 1 week ago

me when i want to run the country like an arcade machine

[–] st3ph3n@midwest.social 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The money doesn't go into health care, it goes into profit.

You mean the ~$200/hr contract cleaners at the nonprofit "rehab center" our 80something year old parents go to is going to profit? no way!

Now multiply that single contract worker doing cleaning to all aspects of building maintenance, medical devices... and unbelievably these are all for-profit entities acting as vendors are owned by the same entity that owns the nonprofit healthcare facility.

I'm not making this up, sadly.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Life in the US may be intolerably expensive and exploitative, but look on the bright side - at least it's short.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] purplerabbit@piefed.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

not to be a raging commie

oh but please do :3

[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Easier to start with socialism.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yes we want fair things, healthcare and freedom, not the gulag and bread lines.

I was there. I know how it always ends. Even if the USA doesn't fuck things up.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 18 points 1 week ago (7 children)

It's less that investment is bad and more that no amount of investments is going to improve general life expectancy if healthcare isn't affordable, or at all available, for poorer people. I think other countries with more sensible healthcare systems actually greatly benefit from american medical research.

Also damn, didn't know Germany's life expectancy is that much worse than than even countries like UK and Belgium that aren't exactly known for healthy living or good public policies.

[–] arudesalad@piefed.ca 12 points 1 week ago

The UK used to have one of the best healthcare systems in the world. If we don't fix it soon I'd imagine our life expectancy is going to drop soon.

[–] yozul@beehaw.org 6 points 1 week ago

Almost all health care research in the US was funded by the NIH. So, uh, oops. The very tiny amount of research that pharmaceutical companies do with their own money is just excuses for extending patents on profitable drugs. Real research has always been funded with taxpayer money, even in the US. That isn't even included in that chart for how expensive US healthcare is, either.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] azolus@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't worry guys, we're folding to MAGA pressure in the EU and our conservative parties are working hard to privatize our healthcare so it can be just as shitty as yours.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No we are not going to; and we are going to combat that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

twice as much money to live several years shorter and work that much closer to retirement, most likely

are you winning, america?

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The main problem is comparing America to other wealthy liberal democracies. We're closer to lower income countries with far more authoritarian governments at this point, and we'll only get closer with time. Comparisons to Russia and China would also be quite apt, as they're in similar imperial positions.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I hear healthcare is great when you ignore black women.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

nah, it even sucks as for white men at this point. Nobody except the uber rich like our system

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I mean, you're kind of right? It is much worse for black women though. The rate's of infant and maternal mortality are shockingly higher for them, let alone other health outcomes. As well you've got the case of Adriana Smith, which yes, could absolutely happen to a white woman. However, it's not really surprising the case they used to normalise the concept was a black woman.

[–] traceur301@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

the whole culture of medicine is infected with conservative quacks whose first line of treatment for non-white-men is trying to convince patients they don't need treatment

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 5765313496@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No no, see, you forgot to convert between metric years and US years.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 12 points 1 week ago

1 US year is 0.95 EU years just like how 1 woman dollar is 85 man cents

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rich people have higher chance of becoming doctors than smart people.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 8 points 1 week ago

OUCH

never heard it that way before

[–] Metype@pawb.social 9 points 1 week ago

In my defense I'm a little stoned, but I couldn't find the US flag for a moment it's such an outlier.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] jimjam5@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Happy to see Japan towards the left and up.

Having spent a considerable amount of time there, it’s a multitude of things that are swaying the life expectancy. Yes healthcare there is significantly cheaper, but perhaps more importantly their diet is phenomenal (higher amounts of non-processed foods and *vegetables* [the town I lived in grew simple but quite delicious veggies]).

😩 日本に戻りたいなぁ

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 week ago

fucking love vegetables bro that’s what they don’t tell you about america is they brainwash us from literally age zero to believe vegetables aren’t the tastiest yummiest shit

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ngl i struggled to find japan at first glance it blends in and lools like a red data point 🤪 🙈

load more comments (1 replies)

It’s not about keeping you healthy. It’s about making someone else rich.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder if the life expectancy is calculated as a birth-to-death or weighted to reduce the effect of infant mortality, which I imagine is also worse in the US.

If not, I wonder how our anti-abortion and anti-women legislation contributes to that life expectancy reduction in addition to the lack of access to healthcare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 week ago

research indicates germany’s lagging here is due to an excess of cardiovascular related deaths; thus, lifestyle factors like smoking, drinking, and sedentary-oriented infrastructure are a major factor

https://www.monitor-versorgungsforschung.de/en/news/lebenserwartung-deutschland-in-westeuropa-unter-den-schlusslichtern/

[–] plyth@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

Considering the obesity rate, the money could still be well-spent.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think that US figure is way too skewed for this chart

The US probably spends less that most first world countries on providing actual health care services to its citizens .... the rest of the money and funds that are calculated into charts like this should be identified as financing a private for-profit medical / health industry.

The US doesn't have health care ... they have a private medical industry

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, the US really does spend this much per person on average. Expenses intended for medicine that end up in finance pockets count. You don't get a handicap in this game merely because your system is corrupt. There is already plenty that isn't being counted here, like how the costs of poor health externalize onto and make more expensive everything else in our society. If anything, the dot for the US in this chart isn't far afield enough.

By the way, this is also how the US spends more per person on education than any other country despite having some of the worst education outcomes. We just shovel money into tech and finance and get nothing back from it.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the rest of the money and funds that are calculated into charts like this should be identified as financing a private for-profit medical / health industry.

Lol, change the rules to make the numbers look better, eh?

Per capita spending should include the money wasted going to for profit health care, because that's money wasted that should have gone to health care, and is a contributor to that high number. Don't lie to yourself to make the metrics look better, solve the actual problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zeca@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A public health system can focus on the prevention of health problems, which saves a lot of money... and lives. The private sector has no interest in that.

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

Aren't medicines and treatments in the US something like X10 times the price of other places?

So the majority of money put into US healthcare would surely be lost down that plughole?

Be a commie, if it means not agreeing with the US version of capitalism. Anything goes, ethical is out.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Well what are the two top left?

[–] crimsonpoodle@pawb.social 7 points 1 week ago

Japan and evil universe Japan; where healthcare is surprising a bit cheaper.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›