this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2025
182 points (95.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

64318 readers
607 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A splash screen for the internet portal at a Hampton Inn. The text says:

"We are pleased to provide you with internet service during your stay. By clicking below, you agree not to download, share or otherwise use others' copyrighted content, such as movies, music, computer games or television shows without proper authorization."

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago

Did Sam Altman ever stay at a Hampton Inn? This is going to be the thing that finally gets him!

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 month ago

I mean no shit they don't want you pirating when using their wifi lol

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I wonder how hard it would be to set up a hidden raspberry pi proxy server on the hampton inn's wifi and use it as a torrent vpn.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Well, considering that even their premium wifi will usually only get about 29 Mbps down at the high end, it won't be super effective.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It doesn't sound like effectiveness is their goal anyway.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

fair enough, I may have a different perception of hotel wifi than the average person due to extensive work travel.

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is basically what I get at home, on average, despite paying for 100Mb/s, because capitalism says you can use the words "up to" when you sell something that will likely never reach that number.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

classic. isp's always over promise and under deliver. in this case it's not that there's not more headroom available, it's just that they throttle non priority devices leaving us high and dry when you're trying to play a game and use voice

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Use a router setup to combine network connections for throughput, setup in a box with solar in motel central, and tada, you're risking someone else's connection.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I already use a glinet beryl ax for all my hotel stays- they're typically 8 weeks at a time so it's important for me to be able to isolate myself from their standard network.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

For anyone else curious:

https://www.gl-inet.com/products/gl-mt3000/

Looks like it has built in wireguard vpn client support, so you can connect to an external vpn server and route all traffic to it automatically from all your devices.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

can confirm that it works well, however ease of use typically keeps me off of the vpn for my quest 3. it does occasionally glitch out a bit since newer hotel networks are usually dualband so you'll have to manually set the beryl to only accept 5ghz otherwise it'll frequently deauth. I've noticed that sometimes it'll also deauth if there's another beryl on the same network. It's kind of like playing whack a mole with deauthing.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago

Only as hard as managing logging into WiFi/the captive portal.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

You mean a GL.iNet travel router?

Main difficulty is gonna be the SATA stuff.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder how many nasty letters they've received after guests have quickly downloaded a film for their overnight stay.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well maybe if they didn't charge $35 for a porn....

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sounds like you have a very specific axe to grind.

I wouldn't say specific, I used porn as an example. In my case it would actually be the old videogames you could play on hotel TVs back in the 90s and presumably 00s

Shit was expensive for an 8yr old

[–] fuwa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago

What's the point? Is that a legally binding contract? What penalties are there if you breach it?

I'd say it's just social engineering because they have a low bandwidth connection (for the number of users).

Disclaimer: I do find it's extremely rude to overuse a shared internet connection, regardless of what use you make of it.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago

They didn't define "proper" and "from whom" authorization. Checkmate.

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yOu wOUlDnT sTeaL tHE TrOUSer prESS....

Well not without my stealing trousers.

[–] TheTurner@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

I mean, I downloaded Space Marines 2 over their WiFi while I was out of town for work. Lol. With a VPN of course.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You wouldn't shoot a Policeman and then steal his helmet. You wouldn't go to the toilet in his helmet, and then send it to the Policeman's grieving widow, and then steal it again. Downloading films is stealing; if you do it you WILL face the consequences!

Edit: link to video lol

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Oh. I just noticed your username haha. Username checks out

Offering you extremely proper authorization for anything you like. Hmu.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

By tht logic you're not allowed to even so much as visit a website as that would require you to download logos another media into your cache. Seems pretty useless to me.

[–] JakenVeina@midwest.social 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah, this seems like a non-issue, to me. When the ISP sees pirated traffic, they have to issue a notice to the customer, and that customer is Hampton Inn. The ISP doesn't know or care that the end user isn't Hampton employees. They're just covering their ass, legally.

Don't pirate without a proper VPN.

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 7 points 1 month ago

Sounds to me like you need to update your blu-ray collection to 4K during your stay.

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

B-b-but what about my LLM girlfriend

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Sorry only local runnable models allowed within 500 feet of the anti pope

[–] teuto@lemmy.teuto.icu 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's a standard page on Hilton hotels, I think they started rolling it out about a year or two ago and most Hiltons have it now. 50/50 their internet is better than dialup anyway.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Hilton's internet is amazingly shitty.

Comicly so, it is so bad. Dial up is right.

In any case Hampton is owned by Hilton so they must be using the same outsourced internet group.

Hilton: nickle and dime you any chance we can while pretending to be a nice hotel.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

It's so funny to me when rules say "don't do something illegal." I get it, I get that they want a specific thing to point at if they boot you off, but it feels so silly.

I hereby grant you all "proper authorization". Ez

[–] Undertaker@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I was looking for 'car' but only got a valid statement regarding copyrighted content.
What's your point?

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 5 points 1 month ago

Muh they said bad words against using their internet to illegally copy content!