this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
575 points (99.0% liked)

World News

49001 readers
2255 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The New York Times on Tuesday ignited a wave of backlash after revealing a framed photograph of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman displayed inside the New York City mansion of convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The article, which takes readers inside the late convicted paedophile's seven-storey Manhattan home, features surveillance cameras positioned above his bed and in adjoining rooms, taxidermied animals, and provocative artwork, including a sculpture of a bride clutching a rope suspended from the ceiling in the atrium.

The criticism escalated as people connected the image to long-standing allegations of Gulf-Israeli collaboration.

Sam Youssef, author and editor of American and International Affairs, asked: “Do you now understand why Arab rulers kneel to Netanyahu and the Mossad?”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 2 days ago

Uh oh. The guy who has people dismembered may be a bad person!

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 207 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The man that has dismembered journalists might have had sex with children? I'm shocked. He seemed like such a nice guy.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

Widen that net, I'm pretty sure that's Jared's best friend

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 55 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The photo in question. Please download and share for the Streisand effect!

[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Jeffry Epistien had a "fake" Saudi passport. I'm sure he was helpful when MBS bought an entire island in the maldives and flew 150+ girls tested for stds for a party:

https://nypost.com/2020/08/31/inside-the-lavish-life-of-saudi-arabias-party-prince/

[–] ours@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

This picture disappearing from Twitter/X in 3, [MBS calling Musk], 2...

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Oh not the guy who likes to cut people up with chainsaws is a bad person??

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I get that you may not like the guy but that's straight up slander. there's no evidence he had anyone killed with chainsaws. it was a bonesaw.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

Good thing he's Twitter's second largest investor, so he can wave away this a well. Less messy than having to trick a reporter to go to his embassy and having him chopped up to bits to shut him up from Twitter.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's always the ones you most expect.

I'd love to see this guy's head on a pike.

[–] greywolf0x1@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

< love to see this guy's head on a pike.

same here

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 86 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Aren't parts of Dubai basically just an alternative to Epstein's island? We've known about Dubai/yatch girls and their poop play for about a decade now, I think. The whole Gulf region is compromised.... They'll taste Hell but I wish something was done today as well.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 40 points 3 days ago

Yes, the UAE is the most compromised Middle Eastern country. Saudi rulers however try to paint a conservative image as they heavily profit from Muslim pilgrims.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 20 points 3 days ago

Hell is a punishment fetish for religious extremists.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

Yeah, when I saw this my first thought was: you mean the guy in a leadership position in a country where it's legal and normal to literally sell your underaged daughters to middle aged men, was interacting with a known sex trafficker for underage girls? Shocking!

.... But I don't know enough about what's happening in that country to know whether that specific thing is still legal/normal. Bluntly, I don't really care. I care that young women are being put through that, I don't care about the culture or the people in the culture that would participate in such activities. To me they're all assholes.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

They’ve always been compromised. It’s a backwards culture (not everyone is part of it but the heads of state certainly are) that only has wealth because of oil. Otherwise they’d be living still like they did in the 1800s.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

only has wealth because of oil

And that's why they fund troll farms and fascist politicians to oppose renewable energy and to lie about the climate crisis. Their economy is far from diversified, and without oil, they'll be back in tents within a decade, if the TCNs don't organize and overthrow the reactionary parasitic bastards first.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 days ago

Honestly things may have been better in the 1800s.

load more comments (2 replies)

Chad move.

Be massive monster.

Put up portraits of other despots.

Get killed in prison

Release lists as photo album.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's weird. I thought the Saudis were into taking shits on American actresses, not raping children.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Rich people love raping children.

It's an industry and part of their culture.

If you support rich people, you support child rapists and child rape.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

OMC Taylor swift rapes children !

All rich people? Paul McCartney rapes children? Your views might be a little extreme here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It would be so ironic if MBS raped girls together with Barak the former prime minister of Israel. The most fucked up way to make peace in the Middle East imaginable.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The whole Gulf leadership is in American pockets and they work together with Israel.

Israel-Saudi Arabia land bridge emerges as game-changing prospect

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They did not increase oil production to replace Russian oil, after the full scale invasion of Ukraine. That was something the US really wanted, so hard to say they are in the pocket of the US. The simple honest answer is that the entire Gulf leadership has no problem with large scale human rights violation and starving thousands. They did it themself in Yemen and currently partly in Sudan.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago

That's true. They do look out for their own wallet first. Any time they can earn 5 bucks by slaughtering a poor brown person the Gulf leaders are the first ones in line.

the entire Gulf leadership has no problem with large scale human rights violation and starving thousands

No way! What about the fact that they're boldly standing up for their coreligionists in Palestine?

/s just in case.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

The have a common interest in crushing Arab democracy.

“Do you now understand why Arab rulers kneel to Netanyahu and the Mossad?”

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 21 points 3 days ago

You mean a murdering piece of shit likes to abuse little girls. Sounds right on brand.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's funny to think that the world is mostly able to get along except for the faux friction cultivated between cultures by a handful of people to maintain a status quo which affords them any luxury they could crave. More articles like this and I won't need to buy tinfoil.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

It hurts my soul every day to think of what things could be like if we weren't held back by this handful of evil manipulative people that sow chaos where otherwise we might have peace, cooperation, empathy, unity, and strength.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It’s illegal to have sex outside of marriage in Saudi Arabia and while there is no age of consent, you must be 18 to marry. It’s not like he would break the rules.

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Well, you're not going to believe this but there are temporary marriage contracts available that can be as short as an hour.

Why do people need an hour long marriage? Beats me...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikah_mut%27ah

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's a Shi'a practice. The Saudi royals aren't Shi'a; they belong to a rabidly anti-Shi'a Sunni sect, the Wahhabis. The Saudis routinely murder and terrorize members of the Shi'a minority in the Eastern Province.

The reason for temporary marriage is generally "try before you buy" during marriage negotiations. It's a loathsome practice but not relevant to the slimy deeds described here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] burgerchurgarr@lemmus.org 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That’s a Shiaa thing and in Saudi Arabia Shiaa are being persecuted. There are plausible reasons for this practice to exist, e.g. being in a committed relationship and wanting to get married properly but for whatever reason not being able to get married currently. Prostitution is not a plausible reason, even though it’s common practice to use it as way to "legalize“ it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TimeNaan@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sociopaths being sociopaths. Shame that they have power over all of us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 days ago

Saudi Arabia makes up its own rules about everything. It's Trump's model.

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Of all the heinous things MBS has done, this is the one to generate outrage?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 days ago

He's getting outrage for the stuff inside of his country as well. But this heavy link to American and Israeli intelligence demolishes his image as a "Pious Muslim ruler".

MBS has had a lot of whitewashing done to for image by consulting groups like BCG.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Of course, this clown is a puppet. He didn't get his position because he's a good leader, he got his position because he plays ball. Have fun blowing all those resources on "the line", ya stupid fuck, until it's your turn to be Saddam'd.

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Why am I not surprised?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wait, who are they criticizing? bin Salman? Epstein? The New York Times?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Do you now understand why Arab rulers kneel to Netanyahu and the Mossad?”

Is New York Times "Arab rulers"?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›