this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
542 points (83.4% liked)

Comic Strips

18769 readers
1365 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 249 points 3 weeks ago (24 children)

What that actually looked like:

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 151 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (24 children)

A perfectly designed test - ambiguous enough that anyone subjected to it can be failed.

I still don't know what #11 is "supposed" to be.

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 41 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I think it's supposed to say "Cross out the digit necessary", so one digit, in which case cross out the 1 because there's enough 0's that crossing out one 0 isn't enough.

It's 10 that has me confused. Is it asking for the last letter of the first word that starts with 'L' in that sentence? It doesn't actually specify.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I would assume each question is independent of the others, so probably a T for 'last'

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] THB@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Can anyone explain #1 to me? What are you supposed to circle? It says "the number or the letter". There's 1 number and the entire sentence is literally letters...

It's like when the waiter asks "Soup or salad?" and you say "Yes".

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Circle? It clearly says draw a line around whatever you decided wrongly to indicate. Lines don't curve and aren't boxes, so good luck.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

And 13 is unclear if it's strictly 'more than' or 'more than or equal'

[–] doughless@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's on purpose - white skin? it can be either one; otherwise both are wrong.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 20 points 3 weeks ago

You actually weren't subjected to literacy tests "if your grandfather was eligible to vote", ie your grandfather was a white citizen.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 100 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Also worth pointing out, WHY the test is so bad... 1. obviously not even well educated people today can agree on the meaning of a good portion of the questions.

but the biggest thing is, not everyone had to take them... IE the key point intention was "if a parent or grandparent has ever voted, you can skip this test". which is such a blatant giving away that they don't care of an individuals knowledge, they aren't actually worried if they can read, they were just keeping first generation voters from voting... at a time when in particular a specific subset of american's were in position to be first generation voters.

[–] match@pawb.social 39 points 3 weeks ago

(black people, particularly)

[–] match@pawb.social 57 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There are two more pages to this and it gets worse

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 25 points 3 weeks ago

Prove you're literate by solving lateral thinking word puzzles.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 205 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If voting needed an exam, they would use that exam to stop certain demographics from voting. And no, I'm not talking about the ignorant.

[–] bestagon@lemmy.world 86 points 3 weeks ago

They used to do this and it turned out exactly how you describe. I would probably also add it’d incentivize politicians to dismantle educational institutions serving certain demographics

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago

Surely there are no examples in American history that voting eligibility exams were used to stop certain demographics from voting.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 92 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It is 100% used as a weapon to disenfranchise voters.

I do however believe that it should be used on CANDIDATES.

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Who gets to design the test, though?

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That is the one fear, especially considering... a now controlling amount of politicians can't accept basic facts... so we'd see questions like "is climate change real", "how old is the earth".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 75 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 58 points 3 weeks ago (21 children)

Fuck no. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literacy_test

Between the 1850s and 1960s, literacy tests were used as an effective tool for disenfranchising African Americans in the Southern United States. Literacy tests were typically administered by white clerks who could pass or fail a person at their discretion based on race. Illiterate whites were often permitted to vote without taking these literacy tests because of grandfather clauses written into legislation.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] eluvatar@programming.dev 55 points 3 weeks ago (19 children)

Who determines the questions and answers? Now they are the ones determining who can vote and thus the people in control.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 48 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Sure. Disenfranchise most people. That's a suitable hack to a
checks notes
stable, legitimate, and responsive government.

Even China would have more political legitimacy than such a system. It would collapse almost immediately.

If you ever want a good example of functionalist ideas leading to absolutely uncritical nonsense, here it is.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 44 points 3 weeks ago (19 children)

This is a bad idea. You would just be creating another layer of gerrymandering.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 43 points 3 weeks ago

Nah, the exams wouldn't be mandatory for everyone. You have a degree? Exempt. You graduated from one of the "certified" high schools (the ones in white neighborhoods but we don't call it that wink wink)? Exempt. Passed NRA shooting license exam? Exempt.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago

They used to do that in the US during the Jim Crow era. It went predictably.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The exam:

Q. What is the secret password? A. Make America Great Again

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Keep trying, Jay. One day you'll make a funny comic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

the main function of the contemporary media: to convey the message that even if you’re clever enough to have figured out that it’s all a cynical power game, the rest of America is a ridiculous pack of sheep.

This is the trap.

-David Graeber, The Democracy Project

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Brazil had something like that in the early republic days, only literate people could vote. Needless to say, only the robber baron elites kept getting elected, also thanks to the significant amount of fraud that happened. "The election is won during the counting"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] multifariace@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

And the approved voters just happened to be from the 50 people who controlled the testing.

[–] bremen15@feddit.org 22 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

It's not working. We have relatively equal education in Germany, and we have plenty of intelligent, educated people voting far right.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

If I recall correctly, Aristotle proposed something like only the educated being able to vote. I think if everyone was guaranteed free access to both a high school and college education, along with all food and living costs covered for anyone studying, then I could see having at least any associates level degree being an okay barrier of entry to voting.

However, such a thing would need to be protected by some unremovable barriers. For instance, education would need to continue receiving appropriate funding, food and other living costs such as renting a room would need to be covered even as the cost for these things change. People with disabilities would need to receive proper accommodations.

A caveat I’ll add is that there would need to be more community colleges built and much more funding for pre-K thru 12th grade as well.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The founding fathers basically solved this issue through the electoral college, you’re not supposed to be voting for the president, you’re supposed to be voting for the people who will elect the president. But that’s all gone to shit, proving Hamilton’s warnings about populism extremely prescient.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›