this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
321 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck AI

3488 readers
557 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Vibe-physics sounds like something you do just before you flunk out of a STEM program.

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 15 points 13 hours ago

ML is actually amazing for science.

LLMs however are absolute horseshit at science.

None of this bullshit is AI.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Can't wait for AI peer(AI) reviewed papers to set the standards for health (eat rocks) cooking (add glue to pizza) and physics (gravity is just buoyancy)

[–] wizblizz@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Its almost like billionaires shouldn't fucking exist!

[–] AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 12 hours ago

Nah, they’re just tugging each other off so the VCs will keep making it rain

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

Well, with all those scientists putting documents in clouds like google / aws, and with those companies happily using that data to train their models, it's totally plausible that they'll announce potential breakthroughs before the scientists officially do... without crediting the source... making it seem like the LLM did a science.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Man, has anyone else noticed that LLMs are really knowledgeable about subjects you know nothing about, but useless gibbering idiots about subjects on which you are an expert?

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 12 points 1 day ago

You don't even have to be an expert to spot the insane gibbering. Just ask it about, say, lyrics from a band and watch it generate completely non-existent lyrics. For example:


What are the opening lyrics to The Advert's song "One Chord Wonders"?

The opening lyrics to The Adverts' song "One Chord Wonders" are:

"We must be one chord wonders, one chord wonders..."

The song, released in 1977 as part of their debut album "Crossing the Red Sea with The Adverts", is a self-aware punk anthem about being dismissed as musically simplistic. The track humorously embraces the band's raw, minimalist style while critiquing critics who underestimated them.

Would you like the full lyrics or more context about the song?

Sure. Let's see the full lyrics.

Here are the full lyrics to "One Chord Wonders" by The Adverts (1977):

"One Chord Wonders"

We must be one chord wonders, one chord wonders,

One chord wonders, that's all we are.

We must be one chord wonders, one chord wonders,

One chord wonders, we don't know much,

But we know what we like, and we like it a lot.

We must be one chord wonders, one chord wonders,

One chord wonders, that's all we are.

We must be one chord wonders, one chord wonders,

One chord wonders, we don't know much,

But we know what we like, and we like it a lot.

They said we were one chord wonders,

One chord wonders, that's all we are.

They said we were one chord wonders,

One chord wonders, but we don't care.

We must be one chord wonders, one chord wonders,

One chord wonders, that's all we are.

We must be one chord wonders, one chord wonders,

One chord wonders, we don't know much,

But we know what we like, and we like it a lot.

They said we were one chord wonders,

One chord wonders, that's all we are.

They said we were one chord wonders,

One chord wonders, but we don't care.

We must be one chord wonders, one chord wonders,

One chord wonders, that's all we are.

About the Song:

The Adverts, a key UK punk band, wrote this song as a tongue-in-cheek response to critics who dismissed punk as simplistic. Despite the title, the song actually uses more than one chord, making the joke even sharper. It’s both a satire of punk’s detractors and a celebration of raw, energetic music.

Would you like any background on the band or the album?


Note that the only editing I did to this was some very minor formatting changes. (LLMbeciles seem to love dividing lines and don't seem to understand Markdown rules for line separation.) Note also that the "full lyrics" that it cites don't even resemble the real thing:

I wonder what we'll play for you tonight

Something heavy or something light

Something to set your soul alight

I wonder how we'll answer when you say

"We don't like you, go away

Come back when you've learned to play"

I wonder what we'll do when things go wrong

When we're half-way through our favorite song

We look up and the audience has gone

Will we feel a little bit obscure

Think we're not needed here

We must be new wave, they'll like us next year

(The wonders don't care) We don't give a damn

(The wonders don't care) We don't give a damn

(The wonders don't care) We don't give a damn

So I give it the actual lyrics and ask it to identify them. The confabulation continues with breath-taking gall:


Yes! Those lyrics are from "One Chord Wonders" by The Adverts—but they're from the longer, alternate version of the song, which includes additional verses not found in the standard album or single release.

Key Details:

  • The version you quoted appears on some bootlegs, live recordings, or later compilations (like the "Crossing the Red Sea with The Adverts" deluxe reissue).
  • The extra lyrics expand on the song’s themes of insecurity, defiance, and punk’s DIY ethos. The band sarcastically mocks critics while admitting their own struggles ("Will we feel a little bit obscure?").
  • The "We must be new wave, they'll like us next year" line is a cheeky nod to punk’s evolution and the music industry’s fickleness.

Why Two Versions?

The original 1977 single/album cut is shorter and more repetitive, while this extended version feels almost like a meta-commentary on the band’s place in punk. It’s possible the extra verses were dropped for brevity or punchiness.

Fun fact: Despite the title, the song uses at least three chords (E, A, and B), making the joke even better.

Would you like help tracking down a specific recording of this extended version?


I'm not an expert on early punk. I'm not an expert on lyrics. I'm not really an expert on anything involved in this session beyond being an expert spotter of bullshit. And yet, it was really fucking obvious that it was bullshitting here. (Note that it called the shorter (correct) lyrics the "longer, alternate version". It even bullshits about its bullshit.)

[–] Nico_198X@europe.pub 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

these are the same fucking ppl convinced in their own brilliant ideas, except they have none of the skill to accomplish it, so they mooch off of other's skills. "i'm an idea man."

other ppl were always just tools to them, so they want to build a skill machine so they can remove the annoying part of being reminded that other ppl are actually talented.

fucking abhorrently inhuman.

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I worked at a company run by a wealthy woman who was owner or part owner of several other businesses, and this sounds just like her. Her contribution to company operations was to run around screaming, making nonsensical/unrealistic demands. She expected other people to do whatever it took to make her demands a reality, but was convinced that she was the most valuable person there.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

run around screaming, making nonsensical/unrealistic demands

Aka "seagull" management.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago

It's almost as if a big part of the current hype is just sociopath CEOs being sociopaths, but not being self aware about it.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“I pinged Elon on at some point. I’m just like, dude, if I’m doing this and I’m super amateur hour physics enthusiast, like what about all those PhD students and postdocs that are super legit using this tool?” Kalanick said.

Dude is right here on the Dunning Kruger curve.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Not the Dunning-Kruger. That's a reversed uncanny valley graph given names to match.

This is the actual Dunning-Kruger graph:

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 3 points 1 day ago

That curve is bullshit both in its original "hype cycle" formulation and in this one.

Because most things crash and burn in the Valley of Despair. Hyped technologies almost always hit the Valley of Despair and then collapse and fail, never reaching enlightenment or sustainability. And the Dunnning-Kruger version you've put here has the very risibly optimistic view that people break out of the know-nothing stage.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 80 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Another example of how little genius has to do with becoming a billionaire. Or even a modicum of sense.

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup. Reading the Wikipedia article about Travis Kalanick, it seems like he just became a billionaire by coming from a privileged background and getting lucky.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

That is literally the success story of nearly every single billionaire.

Starting with wealth also gives more opportunities to get lucky.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's fucking enraging how stupid these billionaires actually are. How the fuck do you accumulate that much wealth, and still have no basic common sense?

Oh, right...overwhelming greed and a total lack of empathy.

[–] justlemmyin@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Step 1. Be born in a wealthy family. ??? Profit.

[–] renamon_silver@lemmy.wtf 7 points 1 day ago

It's also ego. They believe their stolen money can accomplish anything.

[–] xangadix@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Because they just ask some research questions to an LLM of which they know nothing about and when the LLM flaunts all the technical jargon with complete confidence they get amazed (they also feel a kind of kinship I suppose since their literal biggest skill is to bs about stuff which they know nothing about).

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This fuck face claims to be doing "vibe physics"

This is the stupidest fucking timeline

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I have an aunt who is a bit of a kook. She once bragged that while she lacked formal training in particle physics, she had a “strong intuitive grasp” of quantum mechanics, a famously counter-intuitive subject.

We laughed about it for years, but the joke is on me i guess. Here is a billionaire vibe-physicist channeling my quirky aunt in front of a global audience.

The possibility that somewhere, someone might not recognize that this guy is a mountebank disturbs me greatly.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago

Always remember kids...just because you are rich doesn't mean you are smart.

If they don't, they'll just make one up.

Ai+

It's the same shit, just, uh... just buy it! Yeah!

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One trillion. That's the amount of money that has been invested in AI.

[–] dangling_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah. 80% of it went to billionaires pockets, the rest of it buying power plants, funding ChatGPT wrappers, maybe less than 1% goes to researchers.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/will-the-1-trillion-of-generative-ai-investment-pay-off

Also, the article is a year old. It's VC investments mostly. So billionaires are fleecing billionaires.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope they get it to build them a nice big ship and then get onboard.

We've had two maritime billionaire (comparative) disasters, time to reach for the stars

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Except they're the ones who can die from a dirty handset

[–] SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Actual scientists say the opposite. I'd have a many long words thing to say but ai can't word it rightly, but what needs to be knowm is that LLM can slow down many things. Once I had the intuition that I was babysitting a machine, instsad if doing things.

[–] edupo@europe.pub 13 points 1 day ago

AI is like good old alchemy. “Making money out of thin air?” “How much do you need?”

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The scary part is that theyve actually lost it. Thwy concinced themselves that AI is the future even though the whole thing is a fad. And they will die for ai, actually kill their companies for it. It actually got to the point where a new business strategy is just "do normal stuff until all the competition just kills themselves because the shareholders are delulu"

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 2 points 1 day ago

This is also known as "late stage capitalism".

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

They're getting high on their own supply

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

It's like someone telling you about a dream they had.

The discovery is that people will accept any discovery without knowing how the discovery was made, then use another fallible LLM to verify it.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)