584
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 147 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

And this, folks, is why we should tax religious organizations…. ~~Like every other country I know of.~~ (edit, apparently I knew less than I thought I did. I think what I did was conflate a 'church tax' with churches paying income tax. apparently that's a thing where the state collects your tithe for you... if you attend or whatever.)

[-] Zippit@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Why don't they do it? There's no logical explanation for it.

[-] Tyfud@lemmy.one 57 points 11 months ago

A long time ago, it was so that they could use the additional resources for helping the needy and less fortunate instead of the government. The idea being a Church was a community organization and would know better than the government what the community needed.

In order to get the tax credit, the church agreed to never get involved politically with anything.

Fast forward to now, and churches are violating that agreement in a big way

Now they deserve to be taxed.

[-] Zippit@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Thanks, I forgot about the background completely. I agree, be it a mosque, synagogue, church, ... tax them all.

If they make money, they should pay, like everyone else.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

they can deduct actual charitable contributions, for things like running a soup kitchen, and stuff. but that's subject to auditing, and not at all allowed to go into 'charitable funds' that dish out to the board members.

[-] Thorry84@feddit.nl 12 points 11 months ago

There is actually more history behind it. Back in the days when the local king would collect taxes from his subjects, churches wouldn't have to pay. This was because taking money from the church was considered a sin. Whilst donating to the church was a way to absolve yourself from sins. The church would take care of your immortal soul, if you'd just continue to pay them. This lead to a well funded church and no taxes being paid by the church.

How anybody ever agreed to this I don't know. We've invented something called an immortal soul, which is what you actually are instead of your body. We've also invented something called hell, which is endless suffering for your immortal soul. If you don't follow the rules, which we've invented btw, your soul will end up in this hell. One of the rules is give us money.

But then people would just simply say, I've never followed your rules, guess I'm fucked, no point in following the rules now. But wait, we've got a special deal if you call within 30 minutes and give us money. We can fix your soul so it isn't fucked and you can try again to follow the rules. We would also like you to tell us what you did wrong, so we can use it to blackmail you, I mean so we know what part of the soul to fix.

[-] silent2k@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

For the same reason we don’t tax the rich. Corruption.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Historically, the church was the source of social safety nets in society. in the modern era, that's changed to government-ran safety nets (well fare, social security, etc).

there was also some even older precedence of the church running some of the government, so that was payment for that.

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago

What are some countries that tax religious orgs? I honestly can't think of any.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It seems I made a mistake in that assertion, or missremembering the last time I looked into it. regardless i was wrong about other (western) countries not including religious orgs as tax exempt.

[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 98 points 11 months ago

$5 million fine, eh? That's merely the cost of doing business.

[-] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 60 points 11 months ago

Not really. It’s way way less than that

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

That's barely a fucking fraction of a rounding error of a sparrow's fart.

[-] ericisshort@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Why would anyone ever round a sparrow’s fart?

[-] Sabata11792@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago
[-] ericisshort@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I didn’t realize farts were taxable.

[-] Sabata11792@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

The tax code is a dark and mysterious place built for the rich.

[-] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 6 points 11 months ago

Oh his, I was about to say a five million fine goes against the tenets of Monopoly Man, bless his appointed CEOs on Earth

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's not what that means. It means it's just an additional, and "normal", line item on the balance sheet, like toilet paper or the water bill.

Edit: Reposting as I replied the wrong comment initially.

[-] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It’s not normal. It’s hugely undervalued. Not getting taxed on 32 billion for an extended period of time is completely game changing. It’s like saying having to pay an $8 fine for the stolen company car is just the normal cost of doing business. That being said I see where you’re coming from. They get different rules so it’s probably seen as ok in their eyes to get an $8 car or in this case to steal the car themselves and pay an $8 fine later

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The phrase "cost of doing business" doesn't mean "bankrupt" or "righteous penalty", it means, especially in this context, that it's an normalized and accepted business expenditure because of our corrupt regulatory system whereby white collar crime is NOT punished by meaningful punitive actions that would create a deterrence. Instead, any punitive measures can simply be accounted for as a "cost of doing business".

Let me give you a hyperbolic but extremely simple example:

CEO: Let's commit a fraud worth $100m

VP: But that's illegal

CEO: Yes, but the fine would only be around $5m

CFO: Perfect, I'll add a $5m expenditure under the "cost of doing business" line item

VP: Wow, that's a great $5m expenditure, we'll net $95m in profit

CEO: Yep, that's just the cost of doing business.

Make sense?

[-] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I’m aware of what you are saying and I agree but only to a point. I’m saying that even as a “normal” cost of doing business the size of the fine is not normal. To take your example it’s like this:

CEO: “Lets commit 32 BILLION dollars of fraud.”

VP: “That’s illegal.”

CEO: “Yes but the fine would only be around $5m.”

VP: “Sir, I’m not condoning this but that estimate seems absurdly low for the size of the fraud?

CEO: “You’re right, the fine should be much much higher. Can we afford to get a $500m fine as a normal operating cost?”

CFO: “We can. I’ll also talk to my connections in Washington to get the amount lowered and anything else will be gravy. Also, VP you’re fired!”

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

It's just so politicians can say they levied multimillion dollar fines. And the voters are placated.

[-] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

If the average APY is 5%, it's about a day of interest.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah we need to set fines to amount attempted to savelikelihood of getting away with itpenalty modifier. They do this math before committing these crimes, the fine needs to actually deter them

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 58 points 11 months ago

tl;dr:

     $32,000,000,000 fraud
          $5,000,000 fine
[-] HexBee@lemm.ee 44 points 11 months ago

So they were charged a 0.016% transaction fee.

[-] figaro 4 points 11 months ago

Ah yes, 5m of the 150+B in the bank.

That's ... Nothing

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 50 points 11 months ago

Is that even a month's interest on $32B?

[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 41 points 11 months ago
[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Fucking hell. The penalty should be like 90% above for anything over $5M. So a tidy $28.8B. Bet they won't try that shit again.

[-] lars@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Literally feel like I got the wind knocked out of me

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

Just like Jesus taught us….no wait.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

Step 1: Jesus

Step 2: Joseph Smith

Step 3: prophet

[-] Thaumiel@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Dum dum dum dum dum!

[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Ah yes, the cost of doing BUSINESS

[-] Reality_Suit@lemmy.one 18 points 11 months ago

Their not just screwing kids. They're screwing everyone.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 16 points 11 months ago

The priesthood was invented when the first knave met the first fool.

[-] LegionEris@feddit.nl 1 points 11 months ago

Nah. The first knave got away with "Holy shit! Look!" frantic pointing all day long. It was later knaves who invented religion. The fools got wise to the basics.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

It's a Voltaire quotation, I should have mentioned.

[-] DeadNinja@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

They have one extra m in their name

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

What’s new?

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
584 points (98.7% liked)

Atheism

3984 readers
177 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS