this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
1892 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

72334 readers
2665 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 400 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I get the impression that the cops are about to hate facial recognition all of the sudden, for no particular reason

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 176 points 1 week ago (25 children)

There's a reason ICE conceal their faces.

They know what they're doing is wrong and don't want to be held accountable if their fascist rule collapses.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 70 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Cameras. They fucking hate body cameras. When it clears them of wrongdoing, they have the video ready. When they 'accidentally' shoot a guy nine times in the back of the head, video seems to be missing.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

easily solvable problem: losing the footage is indication of guilt. you shoot someone, you better have it ready. it malfunctioned, better have a partner who has theirs ready. if no one has footage to clear you, it's used as evidence of guilt.

of course pussy ass lawmakers will never do that.

[–] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I believe having lack of evidence being the evidence for a crime is problematic, but it sure is evidence enough that they aren't fit for their job and they should immediately lose it. Everyone Including the supervisor who failed to run the team properly.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Upvoted and agreed, not least because I just learned that "all of the sudden," while at present a nonstandard variant of "all of a sudden," has valid history.

And of course it doesn't matter in this casual context!

But in formal writing, in this era, using "a" will avoid distracting the reader from your main point.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"All of the sudden" is only valid because it's so commonly (incorrectly) used. Much as it annoys me, that's just how language works.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

"of the sudden" (1570) actually predates "of a sudden" (Shakespeare) according to my OED as squinted at through the nifty magnifying glass. But it's been considered obsolete for a long time despite having all of a sudden experienced a resurgence.

(Note, I modernized the spellings of "sudden" rather than try to switch focus back and forth)

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Can't we just embrace adverbification and agree to write "suddenly"?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 155 points 1 week ago
[–] teft@lemmy.world 150 points 1 week ago
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 137 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If only CSI enhancing worked in real life, we could out the asshole on the far left.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

far left

From his PoV, he's actually standing on the far-right. Fitting lol

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 123 points 1 week ago
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 117 points 1 week ago

This is ILLEGAL when Working Class people Do It!

-Chuck Schumer at Some Point probably!

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 93 points 1 week ago (15 children)

Is it me or is LA the only part of America doing anything resembling resistance?

[–] ssroxnak@lemmy.world 105 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think it's mainly LA that is seeing a large invasion of federal forces

[–] match@pawb.social 30 points 1 week ago

For the moment

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, it’s happening everywhere. But I’ve also seen some significant resistance happening in other cities like NYC, Newark, Portland, Chicago, Seattle, SF, etc.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago (5 children)

nice.

Is there one for ice too?

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also what about cops outside of the LAPD? This app only useful if it works on any cop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DemandtheOxfordComma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No. Those are gravy Seal wannabees. Ice isn't doing anything on the streets. They are doing the behind the scenes stuff. Deputized bounty hunters are the ones in the streets. No badge, no authority, and as you know instantly disavowed.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

So the people doing the snatching are gig workers? Is there a TaskRabbit for fascism?

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Lol but yes

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Lmao let's see how long it takes them to shut this down

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago (19 children)

What are they so afraid of? They're public servants, so they should be publicly identifiable. If they don't like it, get off the government payroll

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (39 children)

I agree with that the abusive cops and ice is insane in the US, and it should be stopped. I also believe that the US is a corrupt nation in nearly every place of the government and surrounding instances.

But a question surround this, what if the US wasn't corrupt and the judges would actually follow the law (juries wouldn't be able to exist for most cases) and hypothetical if the US had privacy laws for everything besides businesses wouldn't this be the same punishable offence that would protect citizens?

In GDPR countries (among others) nobody is allowed to do something like this with face recognition because the law works for everybody. (Some people are trying to destroy this in some countries, though).

At the same time, if the government is allowed to use facial recognition and other anti-privacy measures to identify people where there is no ground to, then why shouldn't the people be able to do that?

Edit: I am not from the US and my look on life and trias political situations is different than what the fuck is happening in the US

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 17 points 1 week ago (7 children)

In GDPR countries (among others) nobody is allowed to do something like this with face recognition because the law works for everybody.

IDK the specifics of GDPR (and GDPR is relatively new, so it will continue to evolve for some time...)

In my view: the police are public servants, salaries and pensions paid by taxes. They have voluntarily chosen to serve as public servants. Whole hosts of studies show that police who are actively involved with the communities they police, seeing, being seen, being known by the neighborhoods they work in, those police are more effective at preventing crime, defusing domestic disputes, etc. than faceless thugs with batons and guns who only show up when they are going to use their arrest powers to shut down whatever is going on.

If I were to write "my version" of the GDPR that I think the US should enact, there would be clear exceptions for public servants, including police and politicians. Now, you can get into the whole issue of "undercover cops" which is clearly analogous to "secret police" which may be a necessary evil for some circumstances, but that's not what is going on with OP's website. OP is providing a tool to compare photos to a public database of photographs of public servants - not undercover cops. By the way: performance is spec'ed at 1 to 3 seconds per photo comparison, so 9000 photos might take 9000-27000 seconds to compare, that's 2.5 to 7.5 hours to run one photo search.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well, the US Supreme court did explicitely say cops have no expectation of anonymity while doing their job. This is completely legal. Its premised on the idea that cops arent there to be abusive but to uphold the law, which is not always actually true. The root of the problem is cops behavior themselves rather than the recording or identifying of them. Up until very recently cops at least had their names visible and were required to show ID upon request.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)
[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 38 points 1 week ago

Police the police

[–] StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 week ago

Putting it out there for someone to do this for cops in the UK. I can't run infrastructure but the cops terrorise out local community and constantly refuse to identify themselves/turn off their badge cam.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago

Should be the ice agents too

[–] jfrnz@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Since they're typically masked, I'd like to see gait recognition serve the working class for once.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Good. ACAB.

[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. But this shit will get sued so quick because “safety”

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›