this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
626 points (99.4% liked)

politics

24127 readers
2898 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 31 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Oh ok, cool. So naturally he's been or will soon be placed under arrest, because that's how being illegal works.

[–] blackstampede@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

Not anymore, it's not. He's immune from any sort of prosecution related to the job.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Wouldn’t it be nice if rulings against the talibangelical dictatorship actually carried any weight anymore?

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 59 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The past year doesn't give me the feeling that this will change anything.

Trump is still free and doing his dumbevil stuff

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Need more Democrats to sit and wave cardboard signs. Need more protests to run head first into riot shields. Need more leftist to leave social media spaces wide open. Need more Faygo.

Then maybe things will be different

[–] Sightline@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 39 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure that means there will be repercussions

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

Jail time, no doubt

[–] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 135 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

That means all those troops were following illegal orders.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 41 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly, stop going after trump. Go after every officer and government agents who followed those orders. See how fast they enforce his bullshit when they’re facing personal consequences

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 10 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Can’t that asshole just pardon them though?

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Maybe someday we'll honor the 14th amendment, nullifying 47th's term, rendering all of his pardons void

You know, since enemies of the US cannot hold office

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but maybe Trump issuing illegal orders to the military and offering pardons to those that follow them would be the catalyst Congress needs to pass an amendment limiting presidential pardon power.

[–] phar@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, I'm aware realistically that will never happen. I was looking for a silver lining.

[–] bdjukeemgood@lemm.ee 24 points 21 hours ago

Lock them all up. Pure evil. Orders should always be considered against the interpretation of law.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 105 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

A federal judge has ruled that President Donald Trump acted illegally in deploying the National Guard to address protests in the Los Angeles area.

In a ruling issued Thursday evening, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer wrote that such use of the National Guard was a violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution and exceeded the statutory authority granted to the president.

The order, which takes effect Friday, says the administration must return control of the California National Guard to the state of California.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 44 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Doesn’t he have immunity now?

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

He does, but anyone following illegal orders doesn’t. Sure, he could pardon them, but only after a long, expensive, and potentially life-changing legal battle after which they’re convicted.

That doesn’t sound like a fight most regular troops should want to gamble on.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 1 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)

Pardons can be pre-emptive, as long as the illegal act has already occured. (Pardons cannot apply to a future crime that haven't happened yet.)

Just look at Ford Pardon Nixon.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 53 minutes ago

That’s true, but trump is transactional. He and Giuliani were selling them for 2 million a pop. How many military regulars can afford one? Why should trump care to pardon them if they can’t give him something?

If I was rank-and-file, I wouldn’t take that bet.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 58 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

They may not be able to prosecute him, but they can make him stop what he's doing. Theoretically.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 1 points 51 minutes ago

Court: "Deploying National Guard in LA is illegal"

orange dickhead: "KILL THESE 'LOOTERS' IN NYC!

See, this is the problem. Doesn't even matter unless this category of actions are enjoined.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

And when he inevitably doesn’t listen they’ll make a really strong pouty face.

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It does seem the power of the judiciary will be challenged quite soon.

It will probably be with a tweet saying "Make me. You and what army?" and the courts will need to rely on the US military choosing the Constitution over the Commander in Chief.

May we all have the fortune to live securely in less interesting times. I suppose it is our duty to make that happen.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 48 minutes ago

It does seem the power of the judiciary will be challenged quite soon.

I think that happened some time ago.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Might be true, but since the orders are illegal, the NG are following illegal orders if they continue, meaning potential court martial (depending on many factors).

[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 83 points 22 hours ago (4 children)
[–] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 9 points 11 hours ago

The National Guard should release all arrested protesters, return to base and tell the Governor of California that they are "reporting for duty". If not, they are traitors (already before but then even more so).

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 76 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The legal system is just not equipped to deal with the threat implied by Trump.

In the US it seems like judges are just another executive arm of the government anyway.

The few actual judges still considering the law just get perpetually paused with appeals and what have you.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 12 points 21 hours ago (3 children)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

At first I was like "this video is 6 years old, how could this possibly be relevant to this conversation?"

Then I watched the video and realized, "yep... same shit, different day." The conservative playbook hasn't changed a bit and Democrats keep falling for it.

I hate to say this, but you could go back 40 years and this would still be true. 6 years ago, TACO was still in office.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

This world really is worth living in, but we have a lot of work to do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 25 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

So...just let him keep breaking the law until it reaches the Supreme Court? I thought they were supposed to pause his actions, pending appeal...not let him keep going.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

just let him keep breaking the law until it reaches the Supreme Court?

Also after it reaches the Supreme Court.

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The Supreme Court has already ruled against him several times this year alone

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That doesn’t mean he has to obey those rulings.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 1 points 47 minutes ago

He did technically return Abrego Garcia, but then he filed some trumped-up charges against him.

So yea, even if they comply, they are only doing malice compliance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 48 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

He will just ignore it, and double down. Nothing will happen.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 34 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing will happen.

The judge might get fired.

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 hours ago

Or at least get right wing death threats and have any security stripped away, followed by being doxxed by the head of the judicial branch and DOJ.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The question is whether the California National Guard will follow Trump's orders or Newsom's orders in a situation where a court has ruled that Newsom is who they currently work for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 40 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

"Oooooohhhhhh, you broke the law, president trump!"

".......yeah? And?"

And nothing happened.

[–] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

No no you don't understand... The PRESIDENT broke a law... This is like yuge. America won't stand for this.

Jkjk this is just Thursday, tune in tomorrow night for night TGIF! If I haven't seen it, it's new to me!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 24 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Don't worry, Chuck Schumer will lower his glasses a little and give Trump a stern look from across town.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 26 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Okay?

Nothing matters without a consequence. Show me a judge who will put a warrant out on Trump and enforce it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›