Looks like Zelensky actually has all the cards
this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
271 points (99.3% liked)
News
37304 readers
2378 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ukraine removing a significant portion of the Russian nuclear threat? trump didn't even say 'thank you'.
God damn Ukrain is going hard this week
And good for them, these "peace talks" are a farce and the fact Trump's position is that he'll stop helping Ukraine if Russia keeps attacking is the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
Zelensky suddenly throwing all the cards he was holding on the table.
I’m cautiously optimistic that this isn’t all his cards.
Bet you could've stopped that if you had some highly trained guard dolphins posted up around the area.
Russia could have stopped it if they agreed to a cease fire
Just leave Crimea and the rest of occupied Ukraine and focus on making your own country stable and strong.
I see Red Alert 2 reference.
I smile.
I upvote.
The only ways to have peace with a tyrant that denies your right to exist, are to surrender, or to soundly and overwhelmingly beat them. Anything else is just going to prolong the conflict and the suffering.
We did this with Nazi Germany, then we did it with Imperial Japan too, if we have to do it again with Soviet Russia it's only because we didn't do it thoroughly enough in 1991, because we keep trying to imagine there's a nicer, easier, smarter, gentler way to do it using economics and politics maneuvering, by being patient and subtle and sneaky. There isn't, it just delays the inevitable conflict while giving your enemies more time to prepare. Regimes like Putin's do not acknowledge anything other than force, and anything less than force is a weakness to take advantage of, which they inevitably do.
We need to stop acting like oppression, despotism and dictatorship are valid ideologies and forms of government. They are not. We cannot tolerate them because they are simply intolerable. They are a violation of basic, fundamental human rights, they are not merely an "alternative to democracy" or "countries going their own way". We must fight them not because we are trying to be the "world police", nor because we alone are responsible for making the world a better place. We must fight them because it is absolutely required for self-preservation, because they deny and make a mockery of the very existence of the human rights and dignity that we consider non-negotiable, including our own. We are obligated to fight them not because of treaties and organizations like the UN or some international laws, those are all things we developed to codify the fact that we are obligated to fight them because it is in our own self interest and our own survival depends on it. Making the world a better place for everyone in the end is just a side benefit.
And soon we will have to do it to America
Can we please crowdfund about 4 tomahawks to just finish this stupid bridge. I get why we haven't sent them, to expensive, proprietary tech, US preventing deep strikes and escalation. But for the love of God, four or so of some older ones can't hurt us, and I just want to see Russian media coverage try to explain how it's not a problem and nothing to see here. Plus, Russians in Crimea will absolutely shit if the whole thing blows up.
Given the recent announcements that countries like Germany have given Ukraine the ok to use their long range weapons against targets inside Russia I think it’s just a matter of time before we see this happen.
Frankly I was wondering why the bridge wasn’t attacked very quickly after that announcement was made. But with this report of the underwater sabotage I think it now makes sense. This underwater explosion likely took a long time to plan and carry out, and Ukraine probably wanted to see the results of it before launching any long range strikes on the bridge.
If there are other underwater explosives that have already been planted then I’d expect to see them detonated as well. After that then Ukraine might very well launch long range missiles to target the section(s) of the bridge that have now been weakened.
probably wanted to see the results of it before launching any long range strikes on the bridge
Maybe get them to show their hand with regards to the repair resources/ facilities.
possibly an attrition tactic? If they completely destroy the bridge, then Russia might just abandon it and transport stuff there via plane/boat instead. Damaging it just enough that it's cheaper to fix than to set up a new supply chain, over and over, could be more costly in the long run, and regularly divert construction resources. Not to mention the impact that constantly disabling the bridge could have on Russian civilians in the area - i.e. "how is Ukraine always damaging this bridge?"
Could also be psychological - having the bridge there and hitting it over and over and over sends a pretty clear message.
I think its largely psychological/ strategic.
Show you can strike the bridge, you show the enemy they can be struck, they need to dedicate more resources to defending it.
Also, actively destroying the bridge would be a huge knock to Putin's ability to maintain appearances.
Finally, actually disrupting the bridge would be good tactically. But thats proving harder to do. This is the third attempt?
Honestly I was surprised it wasn't pre-wired with explosives or some way to ensure rapid disassembly in case of invasion.
Seems like a no-brainer, but I'm sure that would be prohibitively expensive due to shelf life and stability of explosives, and maintainence for any mechanically coupled systems.
Hindsight is usually 20/20
Because the bridge was built by Russia after its annexation of Crimea in 2014.
Russia built the bridge after it invaded Crimea in 2014 by the way
Switzerland used to have all their bridges wired to blow. They should probably get back on that :/
No cigar unfortunately. Bridge was reopened immediately after.
I’m really liking this Ukrainian summer blockbuster. 🍿
If this is not added leverage against Russia on the negotiations in Istanbul, the Ukrainians might be up to something again. It is their MO to wreck the Russian rear before conducting an offensive.
Its funny as I think this bridge has been damaged before. I bet bridges in moscow are not getting proper maintenance but they will work on this one. Money for war but not for public infrastucture.