this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
278 points (95.7% liked)

Fuck AI

2902 readers
832 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The MAHA report got me thinking. We need a concise slur for people who blindly copy and paste LLM outputs. It needs to say that the person is lazy, ignorant, gullible, disrespectful, and dishonest all at once. Something along the lines of NPC. Maybe parrot? But that’s not too catchy. Any ideas?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gnufuu@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago
[–] wulrus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Clippy (the old Office assistant)

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Asked ChatGPT. It gave me a couple of good ones:

  • Bothead
  • Promptpuppet
  • Promptparrot
  • Neuroshill
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

damn I really like neuroshill but realistically bothead is a lot easier to say.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I like it also, bothead was interesting also but comparing it with metalhead would imply the meaning bot enthusiast.

I used my own brain now and came up with promptsimp

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

🤣 did you blindly follow it, promptpuppet?

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

'olafurp' it is 🤗

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago
[–] ElectroLisa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 183 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

That's good, because they serve up sloppy seconds.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lemonSqueezy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

LLMBro, ... All Profit

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Stupid is pretty accurate.

[–] Poayjay@lemmy.world 117 points 3 days ago (10 children)

We need another one for people who think posting, “I asked chatGPT and this is what it said…” is in anyway contributing to anything.

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 58 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I stopped listening to a daily news podcast partly because the hosts did this live on the air. They’d ask ChatGPT for a statistic, then say “ChatGPT says it’s 37% of Americans” or whatever. They never fact-checked it, and based on how consistently wrong LLMs have been in my experience, it called into question everything else they said.

It’s a great way to instantly lose trust in another person’s abilities.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

67% of statistics are made up on the spot.

[–] glaber@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That might be one of the most unhinged used of ChatGPT I've seen yet. There's virtually no linguistic difference between saying one number or another, all possible answers are gonna look identical to the machine. I'd like to see these slopgobblers try to ask the same question several times and see the results

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The French have a good inside joke. Just call them cat farts.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I see what you did there. But would you call the perpetrators farts or the slop they produce?

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Evertime I tell them that I also have access to chatgpt and if I wanted to ask it I would, I only asked real ppl for answers from real ppl, if you need to ai or even use google, I'm good, I can do that on my own.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] NRay7882@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I could support "lemmings" for sure. They follow one another to their manufactured death, just like those rodents in the movie that someone swept off a cliff.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Combining yours with the one by @vala@lemmy.world, we get "Slop gobbler"

[–] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Slop gobbler

I propose combining the two to make "Slopper."

Edit: Another comment below made the same suggestion first.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ShaolinRaiden@lemm.ee 61 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Be better than using slurs.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In school, plagiarists are called cheaters. This seems the same to me.

[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

But they're worse than cheaters. They're cheating off of hallucinations. It's like you're cheating off of spark notes for the movie instead of the book, totally unaware that they made a bunch of changes. They're stupid cheaters.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago

Delusion maxers.

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I think I've heard "Prompt fondler"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vala@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Prompt gobbler

[–] wulrus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Chatbot Shill

[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But ... "moron" is already right over there.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah but being nitpicky about what specific kind of moron is what makes us human.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Coworker regularly sends me llm slop when i ask him a question. He has a PhD in relevant field. Its so ridiculous. I end up answering the question myself but realizing thats just freeing him from the work so just going to start replying that’s unacceptable

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Respond with "Chatgpt, write me a reply thanking my coworker for the answer"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 17 points 3 days ago

That's unprofessional af...

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Tell the boss. Or the boss' boss. Because if the bean counters get even a hint that a whole PhD can be replaced with a computer, they'll do it yesterday. And then you're in the same situation with less overhead.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago
[–] Trail@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why don't you ask chatgpt to come up with a slur?

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

ironically. a good idea

i did, and it suggested LLMmings, which makes me suspicious about the one who suggested that @NRay7882@lemmy.world

[–] NRay7882@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Well if a bot on the internet gave you the answer then it must be true.

[–] JayleneSlide@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] prude@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

mouthbreathers

load more comments
view more: next ›