this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
1406 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

7731 readers
3310 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (3 children)

So if on average each employee works 37.5 hours a week (likely more but im just picking a common number of hours worked) at 8.32 an hour it would cost 61.568 dollars to pay all 7400 employees for an hours work and 2,308,800 to pay them for a weeks work 52 weeks in a year is 120,057,600 of that profit to pay all of their employees 8.32 an hour....

They made 1,230,000,000 in profit.

Minus 120,057,600 is

1,109,942,400

Meaning the profit they made could cover 9x the salary of 7400 employees with 29,424,000 in change to pay their greedy CEO.

NOTE: numbers need peer review. I do not math.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

One thing that isn't on the math side: profit is the money left over after payroll (and all other expenses).

[–] erin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Dollar Tree has about 200,000 employees. Paying each of them $8 an hour for 20 hours a week, 52 weeks a year is ~$1.6 billion. This is just napkin math, taking a guess at where an average hourly employee would be working, hours-wise. Assuming the profit is going straight into company coffers, they could afford to significantly increase pay or hours overall, but the money doesn't stretch as far as our intuition might think. The problem really might not be Dollar Tree specifically, but the system of economy that led to its creation, and the creation of other massive corporations that rest on the back of underpaid workers.

Their only real options as the system stands (not that it wouldn't be moving in the right direction) are to pay less people more money, or increase hours. Their margin is thinner than it looks. Far better to throw the system out than pretend that the $10 million CEO check is anything but a drop in the bucket compared to the crushing reality of shareholder-driven profit margins. Fuck capitalism.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

For what it is worth, Dollar Tree only has about 66,000 full-time employees. 134,000 are part time workers, so two thirds, who are not required to be given medical benefits--but are given access to pay premiums for enrollment in the company insurance plan.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

You forgot payroll taxes

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It seems obvious to be that a company should have additional taxes imposed on it if its has employees that qualify for financial assistance. Put them on the hook for the costs of supporting their employees one way or another.

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or you could just raise the minimum wage to a point where employees earning it are earning too much for food stamps. That's how the UK does it. They lower the benefits bill by putting the burden on businesses rather than the state.

[–] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Usa employers did the math they fire most full-time employees and reduce staffing and only hire part-time workers walmart back in 2011-13 when I worked there only had 8-10 full time employees which were managers and even some department managers would only get 32 hours a week to avoid giving benefits or health insurance. Every one i knew who were full time worked there for 10 + years. Even if you increase minimum wage they will find ways to reduce costs in staffing so you really need to penalize companies

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

McDonald's and Walmart will lobby against that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 160 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Dollar Tree donates 89% to the Republican party and 11% to the Democratic party.

https://www.goodsuniteus.com/

Don't give ANY business ANY money if they are supporting our current dictator. Hit 'em where it hurts.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 72 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Most of the people who are forced to shop at Dollar Tree are the ones most negatively impacted by Republican policies. It's pretty fucked up.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Is there any large company that does not donate to the Republican Party?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 78 points 2 days ago (19 children)

Dollar Trees and Dollar Generals fuck over poor people. Those “cheater” sizes of cleaning supplies or similar cost more for the same amount of product, it’s just that if you are broke you can only afford the tiny ass bottle of laundry detergent or whatever in the short term.

It’s fucking evil. Dollar Generals destroy small towns - drive out competition and intentionally understaff their stores. You replace local grocery stores which might provide several jobs and keeps money in the community with a Dollar General that pays someone subhuman wages to do everything.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago (3 children)
The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money.

Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles.

But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that’d still be keeping his feet dry in ten years’ time, while the poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.
Men at Arms

-Sir Terry Pratchett

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

It costs a lot of money to be poor.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago (4 children)

So anyways, the rich got rich through exploitation of people. This comment leans towards the lies right wingers teach their children that Bill Gates eats homemade sandwiches and wears cheap sweatpants, therefore learn to scrimp and save, implying you'll be rich.

Absolute morons.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It implies literally the opposite, the rich literally buy more expensive products, and further is about a fantasy medieval society going through the beginnings of the Enlightenment and Industrial Revolution.

This particular phenomena has been noted in more detail as a fact of economics, IE it's expensive to be poor, because the poor don't choose low quality products they have to buy them because they can't afford the larger upfront cost.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boots_theory

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Those “cheater” sizes of cleaning supplies or similar cost more for the same amount of product, it’s just that if you are broke you can only afford the tiny ass bottle of laundry detergent or whatever in the short term.

I didn't notice how different the sizes were until I stopped going for years (between 2020 and 2024) and came back to find products that looked ridiculously tiny compared to what I remembered. The covid inflation fest made it way too obvious.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] shadow_figurine@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The kroger ceo makes like 15 mil

[–] arin@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

This is tax fraud on multiple layers, the executives at dollar tree consprired to siphon federal funds to underpay workers, embezzlement to line their own pockets.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Some poor/working class person will still tell the workers to pull themselves up by the bootstraps. Because some folks are brainwashed by corpo propaganda.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Well, they won't have to worry about relying on medicaid or food stamps anymore

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So you are saying republicans don’t actually have a problem with socialism?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Socialise the cost. Privatise the profits" is the motto.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It's kind of infuriating that if you're wealthy you basically get basic income. You can put some of your money in safe stuff (high yield savings, bonds, whatever) and just get more money without working. But a poor person needs to debase themselves for food.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Employees should have to approve executive salary

[–] Caffeinated_Sloth@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Agreed. Employees should also have ownership in the company via profit sharing or ESOP.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Speiser0@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"Dollar Tree" is an existing company?! I thought first (I read top to bottom) that it was a metaphor for a company that makes money "like a tree".

[–] Flickerby@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago

It's a store in the US that sells most stuff for $1, for context. Or $1.25 now apparently

[–] gangdinesout@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

John Oliver did a piece on dollar stores about a year ago, if you're interested https://youtu.be/p4QGOHahiVM

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

They tried to merge with "Family Dollar" after they were outbid by "Dollar General" but it didn't go through. Just a cheap convenience store.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Actual journalists would have the easiest time in this timeline

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some More News, and The Humanist Report are making a lot of money being actual journalists. Last Week Tonight, and to a lesser extent The Daily Show are also trying to report what the MSM is ignoring. Perhaps you just aren't looking for the real journalism?

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Let's not pretend actual journalism is alive and well when you have ro cite a comedy show as journalists... I agree they do real journalism, but think of how sad the state of affairs is.

This is exactly why I can't really trust main stream cooperate media anymore. They don't do anything now days. They so often just take things at face value.

[–] Charlxmagne@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Astaghfirullah wtf is ur minimum wage, I'm pretty sure ur inflation is a lot worse than most countries with MUCH higher wages as well 💀

[–] Flickerby@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Minimum wage nationwide in America is $7.25 an hour. Well below poverty line.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›