this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
193 points (98.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

11798 readers
1521 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
toaster@slrpnk.net
grue@lemmy.world
Toaster1@lemmy.world
193
Car Enthusiasts Against Car Dependency [discussion] (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 week ago by HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So don't take this the wrong way, but I do like cars. I am also against car dependency. I just wanted to make this post here to start a discussion about the benefits of lower speed limits in cities and towns, investment in effective public transit and non car-centric infrastructure, and other "anti-car" policies for car people. My goal with this post is to list the benefits of these policies for car people as I see it, and to hear other opinions on this topic.

  1. Stroads suck. I am a car person and would rather bike on a well-designed street than drive on a stroad.
  2. Congestion - I like to drive. Most people I know would rather not and would take other forms of transit if there were viable alternatives. If people who just want to go from a to b had viable alternatives, roads would be free for the people who want or need to be in cars.
  3. Safety - I don't want to kill pedestrians. I don't want to wreck my car. I'm fine with driving fast on a country road where I can see for miles and know that there is nothing in front of me to hit. If I do crash, it was my fault, and it doesn't endanger others. However, cities should have lower speed limits to keep pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers safe.
  4. Traffic flow - Where I live, there is a 45 mph speed limit down one of the main roads, but I rarely reach 45 during peak usage times because of traffic. Lower speeds would make traffic flow more manageable and allow car traffic through at a higher average speed.

I feel like the name "Fuck Cars" presents a false dichotomy between well thought out urban design and cars. Good urban design opposes car dependency (which I am against) not cars themselves. With that, I would like to leave you with a few questions: What role should cars play in an ideal world? How would or do you talk to car enthusiasts about this stuff? Do you hate cars or car dependency?

Also because this is fuck cars, fuck some cars. Fuck cars with shitty modified exhausts in built up areas. Fuck cars that run catless exhausts. Fuck big ass trucks and SUVs that run over children to dodge environmental regulations. Especially fuck squatted trucks. Fuck the car manufacturers who lobby to create car dependency and manufacture the child-crushing SUVs.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] afk_strats@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I've tried to explain to a car guy before that, while I appreciate cars as works of art and engineering, I hope for a day where owning a car is akin to owning a horse. A quaint hobby. A mode of transportation appreciated for the experience but usually unnecessary for modern life

[–] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As a motorcycle lover, and car appreciator - This is my wish as well. I don't enjoy having no choice but to drive myself. Give me trains!

But given the choice, a nice Sunday ride through the country is something I love. And if everyone was on the train the ride would be even nicer.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Precisely how I feel about it on my moto as well.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 19 points 6 days ago

In short, just because I'm a car enthusist doesn't mean I think society should be based around cars.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

My town is an older one so we really don’t have stroads, but ….

A couple years back, they repainted the lines on a major street to cut it from two lanes down to one plus turn lanes. Sure enough, it proves out: traffic is slower and calmer yet timing verifies we consistently get through noticeably faster.

Now the lines for bike lanes are fatalities waiting to happen but I guess it’s progress that they tried.

My biggest objection to “fuck cars” people is the insistence on removing parking, and otherwise restricting driving. Maybe my experience is different than most Americans, living without stroads and with functional transit., but a lot of that talk is counterproductive. I’m all for reduced parking minimums for businesses assuming there are other ways to get there but for housing is where I object. Transitioning to a world where fewer people need cars is laudable but until we get there, cars are still necessary for most of us, some of the time. Give people a place to put their cars, because they do still need them, and work on them needing their cars less and less. Anyhow that was my experience trying to live without a car. Even using transit or walking most places, in a city with functional transit, I couldn’t entirely do without. Give me a reliable place to stash my vehicle , and I’m all for trying g that experiment again.

[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I personally like the idea behind car sharing companies:
go to some random car 5-10 minutes away, check for damages, drive, park the car close to the destination, pay a fee, done
Conter argument would be that the driver does not own any car but uses a service

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I did this in SF for several years before Uber and it was perfect. We had a motor scooter for getting around the city quickly, but usually just used public transit. On weekends we'd get a zip car and cruise the coast, and we'd get a normal rental car for Yosemite or Tahoe trips. It was the perfect setup, imho.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

For sure, my experiment with going carless was before ride services like uber and before car sharing like zipcar. Would that have made the difference? I don’t know. I’m not in a position to try again any time soon but maybe in the future.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago

I have an appreciation for cars like I do tanks, battleships, artillery, and fighter jets:

Engineering marvels, but I'd rather not see them in use 🤭

Seriously though, cars have their place, but their dependency leads to way more problems than solutions. I guess the same could be said about tanks, battleships, artillery, and fighter jets 🫢😟

[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I want freedom of movement, i.e., I should be able to choose which form of travel I want to use to reach the destination. Each mode should have their pros and cons. But i don't want society/environment/polices to favor a particular form of travel.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

While we can more or less agree with this, the reality is different modes of transportation are more useful in different places.

  • You’re not going to get an option to take the subway from your farm to the local Walmart.
  • In a pre-car city, you get a lot more freedom and convenience walking out your front door with a train pass. Cars don’t scale well to cities and policies shouldn’t accommodate them very far.

The problem we have in the US is not investing in anything but car and airlines, when there is a range of possibilities to best fit any situation. The problem is the last half century of building out cities and population growth only considering cars. Now we finally realize car-centric design doesn’t scale well, but we have all that post-WWII growth built around it. We have a lot of work to undo

[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

You’re not going to get an option to take the subway from your farm to the local Walmart.

Yes, i completely understand this scenario and I would certainly not say to build a subway all the way to my farm.

The problem is the last half century of building out cities and population growth only considering cars.

This is the exact issue that I want society to understand.

Transportation should have a hierarchy.

  • Commonly used routes: Subway
  • Busy/dense population route with medium distance: Bus
  • Short distance to common transport pickup point or places of attraction: cycle/small vehicle, preferably electric/mechanical
  • Special vehicles for senior citizens/differently-abled: Haven't thought about this much but there should be something

There should be parking areas near the city periphery/big transportation hub so that people coming from the suburbs can park their car and use the public transport. This reduces pollution and heat in the center of the city. If you show you used public transport, parking should be subsidized or free.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I hate space yielded to cars that would be better used some other way.

All those cars parked on the side of the road? Could be a bike lane. Could be outdoor seating for the restaurant. Could be benches. Fuck those cars.

Big ass parking lot? Could be something green. Could be another building. Fuck those cars.

i don't think we should promote private car ownership. If someone needs point to point transit occasionally, we can solve that some other way. I know people that have a car because they go on trips a couple times a year. Wasteful.

If people want a car of their own, they should pay all the externalized costs.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 days ago

regulating the obscene prices and agest practices of rental companies might reduce car ownership because most rental companies have restrictions on what you can do with the vehicles (no driving on the dirt roads, no using a rental car to haul 2 tons of cement, no using trucks to fel trees) where as if you own a vehicle none of these apply (or more accurately are enforced) and you can haul as much as the little cars heavily overloaded engines can manage.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Oh hey I feel kinda similarly, except I don't have a car and don't plan on having one bc that's an insane amount of spending for something I thankfully don't need at all.

From that perspective: I think ideally most private car use would be rental cars. We aren't going to connect every rural place via public transport overnight, and if you need to transport more than people cars make perfect sense for the job anyway.

People in rural areas might still realistically need cars for a long time to come, and I also dislike completely preventing people in cities from owning cars, partially because I totally get that driving cars can be fun and other hobbies have their own carbon footprint. But, as expensive as being a car enthusiast already is, it probably has to get more expensive as cars become purely a luxury. The costs to the individual should reflect the burden they put on society as a whole.

Other than better city planning to simply reduce people even wanting to use cars, I think other good measures (than just increasing taxes) to achieve this could be parking space requirements like japan has. Beyond that I think we really just need a cultural shift away from "everyone has a car obviously" which I'm starting to verrryyy slowly see at least.

Ideally in the long term utopian future I'd want highways to mostly be abandoned, with long distance freight being done by rail and only local distribution by road vehicles. The main use of highways would then be those choosing cars as their hobby and private transport of goods, e.g. for moving. Within cities road vehicle use would only be for transporting goods (and ofc emergency services). But even if we put everything we have towards that I don't think I'd live long enough to see it lol

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Big agree

[–] Eilermoon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I want cars to be by hobby on weekends - to drive for fun. I want driving and cars I be fun and only fun, not a requirement. Would also like to only put miles on my fun car I put a lot of work into when I want, instead of when I have to.

[–] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

I live somewhere that is very much not car dependant, the cars still suck and we need way fewer of them.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Question to Car Enthusiasts.
If your car has more power than average engine/motor,
how do you enjoy driving without exceeding speed limit?
You are accelerating in few second, then just drive with a constant speed.

[–] nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah, accelerating is fun even in small amounts. It's also really handy to have on highway on-ramps that are really short or people who want to run you over if you're not instantly up to speed. And of course, country roads are free reign for letting loose.

[–] murph@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 days ago

I have a relatively slow car with a manual transmission. It's a joy to drive, to accelerate, and then back off around the speed limit. It's well balanced, and handles well in turns. But the limits of the car are relatively low. I can enjoy it at sane speeds.

[–] KAtieTot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago

Yeah, that's basically what I do. Accelerating is fun.

Going to the track is expensive and very time consuming, and 90% of the tracks around me are straight lines (drag strips... Texas... They're scared of turns)

[–] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago

I agree and was thinking about that with the community and movement name earlier today as well actually. You articulated it better than I ever could have.

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

headliiiiiightsssss

[–] HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

A valid point. There are laws for headlight adjustment but they're unenforced and out of date. We need regulations for LEDs and definitely laser headlights that exist for some reason.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Supposedly active matrix headlights solve that. I haven’t been knowingly on the receiving end so who knows, but I can definitely see my headlights leaving it darker around oncoming traffic. From this side of the steering wheel this seems like a place where technlology will save us. We need this to percolate down to all vehicles … assuming they’re really as effective as they seem

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago

i legit developed severe photsensitivity driving uber eats a few years ago at night in my miata. I couldn't walk around indoors without sunglasses for almost a year after i quit.

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Fuck cars!

I'm sure there's room for a more moderate community somewhere on the internet, but surely fuck cars has to be the most extreme one. There are several more rational sounding 'urbanist' ones out there. I'm sure some of them tolerate cars - especially the people that get all wet in the pants over fucking electric ones - fuck those too by the way.

If none of those are any good I'd suggest you start one called 'FuckCarsBut' or go ozzy and try 'YeahNahCars'

Surely we don't have to start "SeriouslyReallyActuallyFuckCars" community for me and the one other anti-car extremist in the world.

Either way there are far too many fucking car apologists in this one. fuck FuckCars

[–] HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There are many reasons to hate cars, but I am curious how you would replace them entirely. Even in the Netherlands there are cars, there are just viable alternatives for most people. I would seriously be interested in how a system with zero cars would work. We certainly don't need the amount there are now, but I think there are a few jobs for which they are the right tool.

[–] oo1@lemmings.world -3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I think humans existed for quite a long time before cars were invented so I don't think they can be all that essential for the species. Humans evolved such traits as bipedal-ism and sweating to help them be able to walk very long distances to find things that they need.

Most humans like cars and find them convenient/time savers or they're just too lazy to walk for a couple of hours a day. I can still say fuck them even if they are convenient. Maybe unless you're in a wheelchair or something - but even then I'd think an electric wheelchair would be better than a car in most cases.

Of course there might also be a couple of billion too many humans on this planet, but it's strange that they all "need" to rush around all over the place and travel much larger distances then they did in the past - you'd think it'd work the other way round. Especially with vans, lorries and boats moving so much stuff around.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

it’s strange that they all “need” to rush around all over the place and travel much larger distances then they did in the past

Honestly this is a good thing. The world is an incredibly huge and varied place and getting to experience different places is awesome. Generally someone who travels will have better perspective on things than someone who's never left the town they live in

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm mostly talking about people who think it's ok to live over 25km from where they work and then need to create "rush hour" twice a day.

I think 10km is about the right maximum for what should be regular travel, you can just about walk it both ways in a day, and still do something at either end. But ideally it'd be less than that. Even if you are going to use a car or whatever you'll be causing far less congestion if everyone did much shorter trips. But ideally they'd be able to comfortably walk. And not need to be in such a rush.

But since you mention it, I sincerely hope that not even 25% of the 10 billion become regular international tourists, i don't think that would be in any way sustainable for any other than a small elite. I'm not interested in elitism or elites however good their perspectives are.

I don't mind everyone having a once in a lifetime holiday. But there are a lot of rich european pricks who seem to have a 'once in a lifetime' holiday every few years, and I'm pretty sure I'd never accuse them of having a good sense of perspective.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

people who think it’s ok to live over 25km from where they work

This isn't always a choice, especially for those with families and those who own their homes. Moving is expensive, risky, time consuming and harms children's sense of place. And that's assuming moving would actually reduce the amount of commuting. If the individual and their partner both have jobs moving might trade one commute for another. Maybe the kids are really heavily involved in a local club or activity that they'd have to leave or commute to after moving. Maybe the commute makes sense because one stops at a friends' or family members' place on their way home from work.

Honestly, your opinions seem to be based on very limited sets of experiences and have a lot of externalities that you don't seem to have considered or have simply accepted without challenge. I appreciate your bold vision and encourage you to keep envisioning bold change for the world, but please do try to consider alternate viewpoints and experiences so you can create a vision for the world that more people can share in.

My opinion on commuting is we simply have way too many office workers commuting 5 days a week without good reason. We saw in 2020 the kind of incredible improvement for everyone that remote work provides, rapidly improving air quality, reducing congestion, making people happier and reducing costs for the masses. I think its an obvious solution to institute a road use tax for employers of office workers and combine it with an equal tax break for remote work scaling based on how many days a week employees are allowed to work remotely. This would push employers who might not otherwise allow remote work to embrace remote work or pay for the negative externalities they create

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Hey now, I'm not creating any visions for anyone to share in - I'm not that level of self righteous narcissist?

I just like the name of a forum called 'Fuck Cars' so i don't feel bad about bitching about stupid shitty unsustainable ways that they let their societies get "organised".

Good luck to all these people raising new generations of children in their "no choice but to commute" image though. Thankfully I'm blissfully unaware of all the externalities, so it doesn't bother me that they're all stuck without any . . ahem . . choice.

[–] LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think humans existed for quite a long time before cars were invented so I don't think they can be all that essential for the species.

You didn't really answer the OPs question but you did mention evolution. Do you have an answer?

It's pretty clear on the evolution of transportation that spawned cars and it wasn't for no reason. You can actually replace 'cars' in your statement with anything, see:

I think humans existed for quite a long time before trains were invented so I don't think they can be all that essential for the species.

I think humans existed for quite a long time before bicycles were invented so I don't think they can be all that essential for the species.

I think humans existed for quite a long time before animal-drawn carts/carriages were invented so I don't think they can be all that essential for the species.

Are you anti-everything but human locomotion?

[–] oo1@lemmings.world -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

yes

[–] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

What about ambulances and fire vehicles?

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 0 points 5 days ago

What car obsessed freaks are using them as a fire engine or an ambulance?

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 49 points 1 week ago

Yeah I agree. Driving is fun and I like cars, but needing a car to do everything is an exhausting way to live. Especially when everyone else needs a car to do everything and there's congestion everywhere.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 32 points 1 week ago

This is a surprisingly common opinion. I don’t share it but as long as we’re pushing in the same direction, then I welcome you as an ally in the struggle.

An interesting anecdote that supports your arguments is that the Netherlands is one of the best countries for cyclists and pedestrians yet also for drivers. It doesn’t have to be a trade-off. Well-designed transportation infrastructure can work for everyone to some extent.

[–] nbailey@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago

100% agree. I love driving, road trips, windy roads, and take pride in having a clean and well maintained car. But I despise the car-centrality of most western cities. Any chance I get, I park well outside a big city and take a train in. It’s almost always faster and far less stressful. Even though I can parallel park, yield to cyclists, not run over pedestrians, and safely follow the rules of the road, most other people can’t or won’t because of how normalized bad driving is. Even worse, most people don’t really want to be driving and do it simply because their job/home are not properly accessible, so they have no other choice.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I also wish kei cars were more of a thing. I like the look of a lot of kei sports cars but I have to wait 20 years after the car is made and more and more states are out lawing them.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 16 hours ago

I've been seeing more and more kei cars around. I live in a small college town and I've seen a couple of personal kei vans, the college has a small fleet of kei trucks and vans for use around campus and there's even a few local contractors who use kei vans and trucks as affordable vehicles with decent fuel economy for running from site to site. Honestly if I'm seeing kei cars where I am they have to be getting increasingly common across the country. I can see why the auto lobby might want to try to get them banned, since it's an unfilled market niche that the American auto market refuses to fill

[–] th3dogcow@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah Kei cars are awesome. I live in Japan and my family has one car, which is a kei. The turbo versions are really zippy even on highways. My non- turbo manages just fine though. The one tiny downside is that they can only carry four people (size wise and legally wise). I would highly recommend one if it is an option where you live.

I usually only drive on the weekends. In fact I'm about to go for a stroll to the drugstore as even though I don't live in a major city, everything is within a walkable distance.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The Autozam AZ-1 type C is my dream car. And four people isn't bad, the standard sedan in the US can only seat 5 people uncomfortably and is quite a bit larger than a kei car. The us technically has a comparable size classification called "minicompact" but there are no modern cars being sold in this sector.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 4 points 6 days ago

Colorado just passed regulation allowing it which is nice! Will go into affect in 2027.

[–] jackod@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 week ago

They should go hand in hand. I don't want my car for sitting in traffic, I want it to tinker with and go for a cruise on weekends. I would love it if cars purely became a stupid hobby :)