LwL

Is it that surprising? Age play is a thing, plus so much porn has actresses dressed up to look like a child for some reason (the reason is people are into it). It's just that, same as any other fetish that will harm people if acted on, 99% of that 1.5% are just gonna be normal about it and not diddle kids.

With the amount of random attention from men women get, the rate doesn't have to be very high for it to be regular, particularly when you add selection bias that people who react like that are probably more likely to approach someone in the first place.

And while I would agree it's probably higher than 1%, 1% really sounds lower than it is - that would be 40 million people globally. If it's 5% it's 200 million and there are still almost 4 billion that are completely normal.

The sad reality is that it just doesn't take high numbers for that kind of experience to be a regular occurence.

I get it though, even if only 1% of men react violently to direct rejection, it makes sense to be careful. Not a lottery you want to play.

So much of dating dynamic feels like it's just been ruined by a few assholes, and the internet giving those assholes more reach only exacerbates it.

Women's breasts are far more sensitive. Also the part where usually they're in a bra all day probably matters.

I've found that clicking them slower (until the new image is fully faded in) can help for the ones that have images disappearing after clicking, and not actually clicking every square containing part of the traffic light (if it's only a tiny edge) helps with the ones that are one image of a thing. I guess being fast or noticing details isn't human enough. Having to wait is insanely annoying though.

In the strictest sense there is no technical definition because it all depends on what is "intelligence", which isn't something we have an easy definition for. A thermostat learning when you want which temperature based on usage stats can absolutely fulfill some definitions of intelligence (perceiving information and adapting behaviour as a result), and is orders of magnitude less complex than neural networks.

Woke absolutely is a thing, tons of people self describe as woke, it just doesn't mean what the right thinks it does. Or more accurately, it's a word with different meanings. They're either using it as an actual self description or specifically to annoy the rightoids. Or both.

I disagree that this will help at all. Certainly not to a degree that justifies restricting other people's freedom. Grooming happens in small circles and doesn't become substantially harder if teenagers can't access nsfw channels. Predators don't seek out adult-dominated spaces. Kids might be exposed to slightly less porn or something but they will still go to pornhub, and now an access channel where there are at least likely normal adults around that could give context id needed is restricted. Worst case they'll be driven to fringe spaces filled with predators.

And also, people don't just use nsfw channels for porn or questionable memes. People mark servers as 18+ for a variety of reasons, some have political discussion channels marked as nsfw to make them easier to avoid, etc.

I use discord to chat and play with friends, many servers have an nsfw channel to share things that you probably don't want to suddenly be on your phone screen in public. It will also filter images in dms.

It's not the end of the world, but it's ineffective at tackling the actual problem, if anything adds appeal by making content "forbidden". I'm certainly cancelling my cheap nitro I've had for a while because I'm not giving any company arbitrarily implementing identity verification any of my money.

I'll also probably look into setting up my own matrix server later...

If they want to be spammed with gdpr takedown requests sure...

If there is an image scan then yea it'll be a problem, otherwise rhe server being 18+ is just a setting you have no reason to turn on, and as long as you don't write nsfw in the channel name, discord won't know something's an nsfw channel either.

In any case still really unlucky this happened right after you switched lol

Tbh for that use case this changes nothing, it's a horrible change for all the usual reasons but it's only implementing the stuff that was already the case in the UK for everyone. So age verification is needed for servers that set themselves as 18+ and for nsfw channels (and there might be some ai image scanning bs to determine if sent images are nsfw?), but for just talking to people you can supposedly still use it without age verification.

Still, it'll probably get worse eventually.