LwL

Most places have laws on this. Often, it is legal to film/take photos, but not to focus on individuals.

That's the thing really, I use "bro" gender neutrally all the time (though in a rare instance of treating transwomen differently I'll avoid it if I know someone is transfem, because that's just asking for misunderstandings). If anyone asked me to not refer to them that way I'll just say oh ok sorry I won't on the future, it's gender neutral to me I didn't mean to misgender you.

All of this, all the pronoun discussions, people insisting on deadnames, is the same as reading someones name on an ID, calling them that, and them telling you they don't like that name and please use a different name (even when it's just a nickname and nothing gender related). If you don't accept their preference, you're just an asshole. You don't need to walk on eggshells, you just need to do a bare minimum of thinking and most importantly listen to people.

I don't have a single peripheral that uses USB-C. I have a lot of USB-A and some micro-USB.

My phone is USB-C and that's about it. Given that my 2 year old PC case has 8 USB-A connectors and 1 USB-C connector, I'd also wager keyboards and mice won't stop being USB-A anytime soon. There's just no reason for them to be anything else.

But is that blueprint dependent on hormone levels? Maybe wolverine would just rapidly grow a full female reproductive system and boobs on HRT, which then would mean that to revert, masculinizing HRT would be needed.

Itasha wraps are niche enough that they're usually custom made, including the art.

Easing local control is what that law was about (and it did think far enough to only include user facing). If there wasn't a global tendency to move towards surveillance and identity verification I'd be all for it. As it is I have some reservations about slippery slope.

The law doesn't require identity verification. It requires the OS to provide the age group of the user (set at install) to programs running on the OS. Something that, if adopted widely, would immensely help with allowing parents to control access (i.e. if they decide their kid should be able to see everything, just put them in ths age group for that, similarly they could also do that and manage it the same way as they would now. Or if they're lazy as many parents sadly are, there is at least some enforcement of age control that someone thought about, without giving up any identifying info beyond an age group). Yes it could be circumvented somewhat easily, but as far as I see it that's always a feature. A child being exposed to something accidentally has very different implications than actively trying to access it.

Money is fundamentally made up. It's whatever the other party is willing to accept as a token that they trust will in turn be accepted by someone else they want a service or item from. Fiat currency just has its backing from being used in transactions with the state.

It also follows that the total value of global money is entirely dependent on people's trust in it. The nominal value of global money supply, whether it is 1 quintillion USD or 100 trillion USD, doesn't directly affect the worth I, or anyone else, ascribe to having 1 USD myself. It's the things that I perceive myself to be able to trade that 1 USD for that do.

What I'm trying to say is that the philosophical idea you're looking for might be more along the lines of "how much of their own resources (time and belongings) is the combined global populace willing to trade for a promise of trading it for someone else's resources in the future".

I think they neither understand how authoritarean states manage to stay in power, nor how even discounting that you'd need some paragon of socialist virtue at the top to give that up.

What I mean by the first line is that even if your leader genuinely wants to dissolve the state eventually, they can't stay in power without surrounding themselves with people that are both power hungry and stupid, so dissolving the state would fail on account of those people. I guess maybe they believe it's realistic to also have all those people have genuine intentions, but it's just not.

The house is a form of saving and investment, the value of that minus the debt would count for these numbers.

It's just still a spelling bee. They'll find some fitting term to call it and that's that. Everyone knows the show is set in a different country anyways. The concept is intuitive enough, even if it'd be very easy in most languages.

Telling people specifics about my hobbies has always been scary. Particularly when it's weird or doesn't fit the way I assume people see me. For me, I ascribe it to social anxiety mostly, esp resulting from a bunch of childhood occurances that made me very insecure about being open about my interests. Probably one of those things that's not directly autism, but commonly happens in autistic people because of the social issues that often comes with.

Seconding the otome comment, and a link to a relevant tag on vndb - you can probably find anything from not very sexualized to pure smut on that list, and there's often screenshots. https://vndb.org/g542