LwL

It's interpretable that way because it's the only sensible meaning the sentence could have, but grammatically it's pretty much nonsense (the only grammatically correct interpretation I can parse from that is that the speaker owns less people than have been to berlin). It's purely context inference, it could say "more people berlin than I" and you can come up with the same interpretation.

Fwiw I wouldn't reach that one at all, best I could come up with is "I am one person, more than one person has been to berlin, so more people have been to berlin than just me".

It undoubtedly is nonsense.

Should supermarkets just sell alcohol to 10 year olds?

I think there are plenty of places where age gating makes sense as a concept, it really is mainly the data security that's an issue. The other is that it should be somewhat circumventable, which I think mainly requires it not being tied to identity (so much like you could get someone older to buy you alcohol you could get someone else to verify your age).

What I think is bad is age gating social media instead of doing something about how harmful it is because clearly adults are not immune and all that does is make it harder for children to get important information.

Everything everywhere is covered in fecal matter. Mythbusters did an episode on it and their control toothbrush in the office had plenty.

That is something completely possible. Dunno about texas, but in germany the pumps generally let you pump and then you pay afterwards.

Walking on toes is associated with autism. Maybe because it's less impact force and also less noise so generally less stuff to deal with.

It's language specific. In english it comes before the number. In many other languages it comes after.

I'm pretty sure I could at my workplace actually lol. I mean people would be surprised and look at it a bit weird bc I just look goofy in a dress but not more than in any other context. It's called working with people that mind their own business and don't force their beliefs on others.

What I wear isn't about my fucking sexuality. It's just what I'm comfortable in. In my case the main GNC thing is long hair which no one cares about anyway, but if I wanted to wear a skirt that's nobody else's business.

It's basically 3% vs 4% risk anyway. Not the end of the world. Since it's one study there's probably not enough data for a case like yours, but in any case it's just a risk factor and not "it will definitely turn you blind".

There is literally no way to eat meat (i guess lab grown but that's very recent, though arguably might be further developed if not capitalism) that doesn't involve killing an animal. It's not capitalism. The horrible living conditions somewhat are, but still nothing is forcing you to eat meat at all.

And yes by buying ultra cheap clothing you're demanding labor exploitatipn. Probably the biggest difference with meat though is that it's not even more expensive to not eat it lol. Buying meat from animals that actually had a decent life is, but that's not the only option.

I eat meat myself but your argument just doesn't hold.

It does. The switch in some anticheats is to just not require that on linux. Also not all anticheats are kernel-level in the first place.

Gungnir datto?!