this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
278 points (99.6% liked)

World News

46709 readers
3697 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Denmark is set to have the highest retirement age in Europe after its parliament adopted a law raising it to 70 by 2040.

The retirement age at 70 will apply to all people born after 31 December 1970.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AizawaC47@lemm.ee 11 points 10 hours ago

And then they have the audacity to ask, “Why is no one having kids?” - This is why!! Why would we ever bring a child into this world to work from 21-70 years old!?(I know that some start working at a younger age.) That’s human slavery! And don’t get me started with the slave wage pay. This is absolutely appalling and euthanasia is gonna be a hit. People will off themselves or have someone end their lives and it wouldn’t surprise me a bit.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

The essential problem is that the people working now are paying for the people that are retired. It would make more sense for the gov't to have taxed the people prior to their retirement, and have invested those taxes, so that in their retirement they would be getting out what they had previously paid in. And switching over to a system like that would require double taxation on the population now, which will make such a proposal very unopopular.

But if your retired population is growing, and you have fewer people working, then you either need to increase the retirement age--so that more people are paying into the system--or increase the taxation overall. If I recall correctly, Denmark has been seeing a negative population growth; that's a real problem for retirement schemes that rely on current taxes paying for retirees.

Is this fair to people that have been working in trades and have beaten up their body for 40 years? No. Likewise, it's not really fair to people that have working in white-collar jobs that may still be more than capable of excelling at their job, and still want to work. (My dad had mandatory retirement at 72 due to company policy; he immediately got re-hired as an on-site consultant, and has been doing that for over a decade.)

EDIT - this is a huge problem in the US. The social security taxes now on working people are immediately paid out to retirees. SS benefits go up to account for inflation, but the amount coming in is decreasing because population growth has slowed. Without major reforms, social security in the US won't be solvent by the time I retire, IF I ever retire.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 1 points 48 minutes ago

Ah yes, the good ol' retirement pyramid scheme. What could possibly go wrong, so long as we create more and more and more and more humans at an infinitely exponential rate?

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago

The government should have been taxing the Corporations that made enormous profits from the surplus value their employees generate and then requiring said Corporations to invest annually in pensions matched to Cost-of-Living indexes.

In the US, instead we got 401ks so the poors are required to cheer the stock market and pretend they're temporarily embarrassed Capitalists, rather than the scornful reality of being wage-slaves.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Denmark has been seeing a negative population growth; that's a real problem for retirement schemes that rely on current taxes paying for retirees

And they're particularly xenophobic, so no immigration to beef up the numbers

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, we're doing the same in the US... :(

[–] camelbeard@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Thank god in the Netherlands we are not and we did not elect a far right party as the biggest party, oh wait...

I hostely fear for the next 5 years, with far right (and anti science, anti woke, anti freedom, anti any progressive idea people had after 1950s) gaining more traction.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

At the same time, politicians here in Denmark can retire at 60! Those fuckers get free housing, free transport, free food, AND after-pay. "Rules for thee, not for me!"

[–] AAA@feddit.org 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If only they'd also be forced to retire at 60. Instead they stay in politics and continue to make decisions based on outdated knowledge and ideals.

[–] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

If they didn’t get all those benefits everyone might be able to retire earlier.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 1 day ago

Yes, they're going to die sooner anyway. Forced retirement at 60 for politicians would be perfect.

[–] peetabix@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

They should be bound by the same rules as the rest of us.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The bigger problem here is that people above 50 are having very low, nearly impossible chances of finding a job if they lose one, especially with rise of AI. These people can't have a job, and now can't have a pension.

Well done, governments around the world.

EDIT: If I'm getting this right, people of Denmark can start taking out pension prior to retirement, so might not be too catastrophical.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 176 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Since 2006, Denmark has tied the official retirement age to life expectancy and has revised it every five years.

What a depressing law. Progress should mean less mandatory work, not more.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 6 points 12 hours ago

What's your name, Keynes ?

https://truthout.org/articles/what-happened-to-the-keynesian-dream-of-a-15-hour-work-week/

Economist John Maynard Keynes in 1930 predicted that the workweek would be reduced to 15 hours within a couple of generations due to advancements in technology.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is also stupid because life expectancy is not equivalent to life quality.

Just because people live to 90 now instead of 80 doesn't mean they can actually do anything significant for those 10 years, they could be bed ridden or house bound and kept alive only because they are taking 30 pills a day. It isn't living, it's staying alive. Retirement shouldn't be tied to that.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 3 points 12 hours ago

Even if they want to die they're not allowed, like at 85 their tired of shittinf on their diaper 4 times a day and they say imw tired of this shit and want out amd they're not allowed.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

capitalists gonna capitalist.

[–] IsaamoonKHGDT_6143@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Denmark has the best labor laws in the world.

[–] BearGun@ttrpg.network 3 points 11 hours ago

Gonna need a source on that one chief. In what way are they better than the rest of the nordics?

[–] DaTingGoBrrr@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

From what I have heard from other Swedish people working in Denmark, it's much easier to get fired there compared to in Sweden.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Kory@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Agreed. Also wondering what companies are employing people that long? In other European countries, companies wont hire people 50+ cause they are deemed too old, inflexible and expensive. I really wonder, if companies in Denmark are different in that regard.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] elaiden@lemm.ee 56 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Having relatives that died when they were 70 and seeing stuff like this is quite depressing.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My ex's grandma slept 5 hours a night, worked a full time seamstress job and cooked and cleaned and raised her kids and grandkids. She enjoyed just 1 year of retirement before Covid hit.

[–] elaiden@lemm.ee 18 points 1 day ago

Yeah, we need to make sure to live our life now and do what we want. Work less, live below our means to save up, take a chance and travel or whatever it is one wants to do, if we are able to. Don't postpone it. I'll live my life as if I won't get a retirement at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago

Right bcz 70 year olds are known for being spry young chickens in great physical health.

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 25 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Let's see them force a bunch of 69 year olds to work cause I know I would just fart in their direction if they tried.

[–] DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're not going to "force" you to work. You always have the option of just starving to death.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Freedom^TM^

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 25 points 2 days ago

This is what the anti-immigration right wanrs to do to you, folks!

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"I've paid my taxes all my life. There should also be time to be with children and grandchildren," Mr Jensen told outlet DK.

I can't speak to the history of government supplied pension in the EU, but in the USA, our version (Social Security) was never meant to provide "a time to be with children and grandchildren". The expectation was that most people would die before being unable to work, and Social Security provided a means for the elderly that lived to be housed and fed until they died. Social Security was designed to prevent living elderly from being in absolute poverty never to provide a time of respite before eventually dying.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The quote says it should, not this was meant to

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] plc@feddit.dk 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The main economically meaningful aspects of "retirement age" in Denmark AFAIK is that:

  • You get entitled to receiving the public, state-paid pension.
  • Private pension schemes that vest at this point or later are tax deductible. (you still pay taxes when it's paid out, but due to the progressive tax code you end up paying less)

By far the most relevant of the two is the latter, as practically everyone is covered by pension schemes included in employment contracts.

As such you can still retire any time you want, but it will be more burdensome for you to it earlier than at the age sanctioned by law.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, it means only people with good pensions can retire early. Incidentally, this is by design those with high wages since these are the basis of earning pension. However, the ones that may actually need to retire early due to the stress of hard menial labor are not in this group of high earners.

In effect we will see people at offices doing easy work close their pcs and have an office retirement party at an age of 65 that poor Olga of 70 years (or more) will have to clean up.

[–] mriswith@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In the US medicaid starts at 65, but you can get lucky and have workplace pension that start early. You only get "full retirement" with Social Security/state pension if you wait until 67 and many wait until then. Which seems similar to Denmark.

[–] sidtirouluca@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago

we need more robots!!!

load more comments
view more: next ›