this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
892 points (98.9% liked)

politics

23558 readers
3177 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago

I’ve been saying for about 5 years, maybe better, that she is the person I am most excited to vote for as president of the United States one day.

I don’t even have another name in mind.

I will be as happy to vote for her as I was for Sanders in the primaries, twice. I legit can’t wait.

[–] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 3 points 53 minutes ago
[–] ExPLiCiT@lemmy.world 2 points 41 minutes ago

My concern is that now that Trump is in office and project 2025 is in full swing, that we will never see another fair election again.

[–] gradual@lemmings.world 16 points 2 hours ago

She's one of the few democrats that I would vote for president.

[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 48 points 4 hours ago

I promise you the Democratic Party will do whatever it takes to keep her away from leadership roles because she actually wants to change things.

That’s the one thing the Democratic Party is consistent on: rejecting progressives, even if it means letting the conservatives win.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 43 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

We should be so lucky to have a party she represents in this country. The only reason she has that seat is by defying the DNC as a spoiler. They only elevate politicians to the Federal level on the basis of how good they've proven they are at collecting that sweet, sweet corpo bribe money.

The DNC and democratic leadership would rather dissappear her Than Trump by a mile.

The pendulum is the point. Both parties are well bribed to maintain the capitalist's murderous control. Good cop and bad cop are both just fine with mass homelessness and entire murder for profit confidence scheme market sectors. One laughs at you when the capitalists cause you harm, the other just shrugs and says "golly gee market forces nothing we can do! But I affirm your right to die horribly as who you are here in this cardboard box under a freeway! Pronouns are free so whatever I still get bribed 😁" (edit to be clear, respecting others identity is the right thing to do and basic decency, but there's a hierarchy of needs, self-actualization only matters if you have your basic needs met. You cannot live in an affirmation ribbon, you cannot eat a preferred pronoun, priorities.)

If the Democrats were led by someone talking about redistribution, that bribe gravy train would stop. If by some miracle AOC manages to steal the party out from under them as Trump did the RNC, the DNC would be fighting her every move and comment the way we wish they were countering Trump right now. In fact, here's how Democrat leadership spent the months leading to Trump's inauguration:

https://www.axios.com/2024/12/12/aoc-pelosi-oversight-committee-connolly-raskin

Defending the country from one of the only slightly left Reps in the entire federal government.

Democrats like Schumer and Pelosi are far closer to Trump than AOC.

https://apnews.com/article/business-nancy-pelosi-congress-8685e82eb6d6e5b42413417f3d5d6775

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 78 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Next to Bernie she's the best the Dems have to offer. And for any possible run for President, she beats Bernie on age.

If they run Harris again, or Newsom or some other conservative Democrat in 2028, the party is fucked.

[–] Master@lemm.ee 14 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Her as president and Bernie as vp. If they kill her then they put someone even more opposed to their views in power.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 48 minutes ago

The Gore Strategy

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 2 points 50 minutes ago

As much as I absolutely adore Bernie, the guy needs a rest. He'd be starting as VP for a potential 8 year period of two terms at 86.....That means he'd be 94 by the time he left office. The man is an absolute beast, but father time catches up with us all and I don't want to see his final days in politics to be a sad decline after everything he's given. He deserves to serve as a badass senator, like he always has, until a progressive gets elected as president and then retire.

AOC and Pete Buttigeig as VP, on the other hand......or Tim Waltz again......or Elizabeth Warren for a double team, all woman ticket? Hell yeah.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 36 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Newsom is trying his level best to have a right-of-center glow up right now. I'm almost certain that the DNC plans to tilt the scales for him. They likely will resist running a woman again for a long time because they've stupidly come to the conclusion that it was the genitalia of the candidates and not the quality of the candidate, campaign, and platform that caused them to lose what should have been two of the most winnable elections ever.

[–] solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 hours ago

Progressive woman of color

Or

Conservative white guy with (D) next to his name.

Pretty sure we can guess who will win the primary if they can help it. DNC leadership is not interested in what it's membership wants.

Absolutely. I can't see AOC being given a chance in 2028 unfortunately, unless things change a bit. Not excited for Newsom as a candidate :/

[–] demunted@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 hours ago

Agree but have the senior members support and coach AOC, have a united front. We're supposed to support and learn from our elders but they have an obligation to move aside and allow the younger leaders to rise.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 5 points 3 hours ago

Primaries should do it, then you just have to make sure the superdelegates don't ruin the result...

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The best part about it, is that the old-as-fuck Democrats hate it, which makes me love it all the more.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Hopefully we get to tell them to get in line or they're a Trump lover at some point.

After all the right-wing Neoliberals I've voted for over the years out of harm reduction to attempt to stop literal murderous fascists, it would be nice to see them eat some of that shit and vote for someone with ideals they loathe, win or lose.

[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 47 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Water is wet. Wasn't this obvious when the DNC kingmakers, I mean, leadership decided to boot her out of a key committee position with a person that that could have passed for a republican and retired after getting the position? A poll was needed to see this?

[–] PaulBunyan@lemm.ee 16 points 6 hours ago (7 children)

Water isn’t wet. What touches water is wet.

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 2 points 42 minutes ago

If you have an amount of water that can be divided, it touches other water. Therefore water is wet unless it is a single molecule

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Water is wet, and pendants are annoying rather than clever.

[–] valkyrieangela@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Water touches other water therefore water is wet. If you isolated a single molecule of H2O, that water would not be wet. However, it is nearly impossible to do this, hence it would be the exception and not the norm.

This argument isn't profound, it's just short sighted.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 22 points 5 hours ago

She's already 35. Run her.

[–] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 22 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

She should distance herself from that sinking ship. It's like continuing CPR on a victim who is already dead. Yeah you're trying but ultimately it's no use. Both main parties have been so tarnished that even being associated with the name is a smudge on the record.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 hours ago

I agree with you, but I also feel that AOC is what the Democratic party is supposed to be. She is not the status quo.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hefejefe@lemm.ee 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Her rally with Bernie was pretty electrifying. I can see how her polices might be polarizing to some, but damn she can get the working class support. Just gott keep the momentum up and get people to actually vote.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 41 minutes ago

Polarizing like a magnet. We'd have a force for good instead of a lesser evil. That's a lot better at getting people to the polls.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago

"Democrat voters want leftist leadership"

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 57 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

That's funny, because the dnc does not share any of her ideology, and it's not even close

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Because the DNC leadership doesn't represent anyone except for the donors who own them.

The voters keep voting for the same corporate fellatio enthusiasts, so I guess they are representing their voters. The core Dem voters are as bad as, and walk hand-in-hand with, the DNC.

[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 23 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah she needs to spilt and be the face of an actual workers party, not the mask for the failed democrats.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

AOC and Bernie should break off, start a new party and call it the Social Democrats ... if for no other reason than that is what they espouse -- a socially-conscious mandate that the government is to be there for the people, not the other way around.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 58 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

Make it clear to the Democratic Party establishment that progressive candidates will be on the ballot in every congressional district in Nov 2026, and they will be a spoiler candidate if they have to be. Either way, we are done with their shit. There will never be a better time.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The way to prevent a new party from being a spoiler, is having the neoliberal DNC not running a candidate.

Since they clearly aren't interested in winning or stopping Trump, nothing would change.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›