this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
1139 points (98.8% liked)

politics

23558 readers
3481 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 76 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

The US needs a third, a fourth, a fifth and several more parties as viable alternatives.

They to drop any weird FPTP systems, this will allow new parties to come into play.

This would also end the ridiculous gerrymandering shit

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Omg, I love you. I've been screaming this since CGPGrey's videos about voting and alternatives to what we have. Getting that is gonna require all existing party members to be cool with a complete loss of power and an increase in the amount of work the have to do to keep their power or get elected.

It'll take the states. However, there are already states trying to ban alternative voting methods.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 18 hours ago

Haha, thank you for your kind words!

As a Swede, the US election system has always seemed so backwards, even the fact that you have to register to vote is completely foreign to me.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 18 hours ago

And there's no chance it can get one while $ is in American politics.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, no.

If no party can get to 270 electoral votes, the president is picked by the House of Representatives.

That means congress would need be flippped into third party majority first.

Splitting the left off only benefits the far right. Anyone who thinks otherwise is stuck in an echo chamber.

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This is why stoy said the First Past the Post system needs to be dropped.

[–] the_fuzz@lemm.ee 2 points 14 hours ago

Which would require a constitutional amendment, meaning it’s a pipe dream.