wget will give you a sniff of what the problem is. Microsoft Store will not.
I don't NEED an application to necessarily pinpoint the error. Just even a rough direction. Any browser will explicitly tell you if there is a cert issue. That's more than enough to go on.
I had the opportunity to experience a masterclass in how to handle extreme weather events in Saskatchewan.
-Bundle the fuck up
-Check on / help your neighbours
-If you see someone stuck in thier vehicle help them for God's sake.
In terms of unstucking a vehicle, the trick is to "rock it" out. Once you even get a little bit of motion, you're in a better spot. If you are bring pushed, or are pushing, make sure the driver's window is open for communication. When pushing, still be thinking about the task as rocking out. You push and they apply (a little) gas, till they hit the limit. Let them roll back after, then coordinate another push.
I understand the mechanism, and why it is important.
I don't understand why the error message from the store was nothing more than an error code, and why the MSKB for that code had absolutely no mention of a failed ssl negotiation as a possible cause.
Businesses in general bend over backwards to create an environment in which I will be comfortable. Music, decor, etc. I'm in the prime money-spending age bracket. It's very comfortable to be prioritized. I think the vast majority just a accept it as the natural order of things to have the world revolving around your taste. The boomers got and extended run based on thier outsized share of wealth, but it's over now.
I don't think gen x even ever got that moment in history, which is so funny and sad at the same time... such a predictable curse...
I don't think many people really get that it's just a statistical thing. Nobody gives a shit about ME. I'm not special. I'm just currently in that demographic.
Assuming time is linear, this will change. Younger people will be in my position, and the environments will mould and shape to thier sensibilities, and I'll be left in the dust.
I think if people are unaware of that reality... it's probably really jarring to be pushed aside, even in really small ways. I expect it all adds up.
Couldn't install iTunes because my clock was wrong. That certainly wasn't the ERROR I was presented with, but was ultimately the root cause.
That, coincidentally, was the very same evening that I decided to and did uninstall windows on that machine.
Russia would hit the Baltics. Not necessarily a full commitment, just a little land grab. Just to prove to the world that the US will not defend NATO countries.
Little bit of trivia is that Canada shares a land border with the EU.
I agree with the ultimate goal (getting Canadian support, or at the very least Canadian silence).
I disagree about how it could possibly achieve those ends.
A weak Canada becomes little more than a US puppet. Full stop. Based on proximity, relative cultural similarities, and trade dependence, that's the inevitable result. Nothing China could ever do could alter that outcome. A weakened Canada folds into the US in global matters. If that happens, China has lost before the game even begins.
It's a strict prerequisite that Canada be able to absorb the reprocussions of breaking ranks with the USA if you want Canada to break ranks with the USA. A stable, economically diversified Canada CAN. Otherwise it CAN'T.
So "can they" is the first hurdle for China. The second is "will they". That's where this is all playing out. Over the last... I dunno, 4 years, they've been working on the "will they" by getting cozy with politicians.
Right now, they're at significant risk of backsliding from a "will they" situation back to a "can they" situation.
The USA has a much shorter path. They don't have to compete for "will they (side with USA)" if they can merely make it so that "can they (break ranks)" becomes unfeasible based on economic and political turmoil.
It's bizarre because the scales have really tipped.
3 years ago, China wanted to directly interfere with Canada for the purpose of stacking the government to be more "Pro-China", and that's an active threat for sure. The USA just wanted favorable trade conditions and general support on the world stage.
Fast forward to now, the USA is actively trying to destabilize and divide Canada. They want a weaker nation. Seed dissert. Makes the country easier to push around. China... still obviously wants Canada to be more "Pro-China", but for Canada to be what they want... they still want a strong Canada. A strong Canada could be a vocal counterbalance. One in disarray can not.
So, while it's true that both countries are actively threatening Canada, their idealized vision for a Canada that can be exploited are basically polar opposites. A strong Canada willing to break ranks w/ the USA, vs a fractured weakened country thar can't afford to.
If it makes you feel any better, I always hear and appreciate the little countermelodies coming from the Euphs
Oh, don't worry about that. The inflated egos are distributed across all the musicians too. It takes a special kind of personality to achieve that level of singular proficiency.
I think it's one other reason to HAVE a conductor, is to have an ultimate authority on some matters where musicians egos get involved.
In many (most?) compositions, there are going to be some banger little licks in many different sections. It honestly kinda sucks sometimes when you've got one... but you gotta hold it back because it's still just a supporting component. To you, as the musician... you might fall in love with it, wanna push it, take the opportunity to shine and generate some goosebumps. And, obviously, since you're God's gift to the world, you SHOULD. The composer was WRONG to hit you with a mp. Maybe the composer's French Horns couldn't lead with it, but they never envisioned your talent.
The trumpets shoot you a look to calm down? Fuck 'em. They always get the spotlight.
Having a structure with an ego to rule all egos helps (does NOT eliminate) these kinds of things.
It's not JUST for thier base.
For anyone pondering joining such actions, these would be leaders.
If you're thinking of joining, and the leaders look "weak", it might not inspire much faith. You might decide to hold back.
The truth is, she looked calm and collected, confident in her decisions and actions. She looks like a leader. She looks like someone worth following. That type of imagery is dangerous if you're trying to suppress action.
So, in short, it's an attempt at active suppression, not just a "treat" for thier own. It's the modern equivalent of going on about how short Napoleon is. It's an attempt to diminish those they're afraid of to try and keep others from following them.