this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
147 points (80.2% liked)

science

18581 readers
744 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

This website's use of stock images and gifs were aggravating. The actual case study was worth the read, but only covers a single pair of individuals: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886922001477

It's certainly interesting. I'm particularly curious about the effects of the multiple confusions:

US had three concussions as an adult, caused by car accidents and from falling on ice. The most recent and severe incident occurred in January 2018, resulting in classic symptoms of light sensitivity and concentration difficulty. US feels she is a “different person,” with increased anger and anxiety. She requires additional time to process information in some problem-solving situations, although she has always seen herself as a poor test taker.

Some of the conclusions seemed a stretch for a single sample. I'm much more curious about more extensive studies with many more subjects.

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 12 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

If anyone else is wondering why their faces on the image are not identical: its a representative stock pic

[–] x4740N@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago

With america being the shitshow that it is I am not surprised

I do hope she could move back and get the support of the family in South Korea because she shouldn't have to live in that sithole anymore

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Look at what Americans consume. There's your answer.

[–] nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip 18 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

There's link for the study: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886922001477

Personality traits, mental abilities and other individual differences: Monozygotic female twins raised apart in South Korea and the United States by Nancy L. Segal and Yoon-Mi Hur

[–] datalowe@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It is literally a case study with a single pair of subjects. At first I thought the OP pop sci article was just focusing in on one pair of participants of many. Most of the discussions in threads here seem wholly unwarranted. There are loads of random factors that affect people's development, many of which can't realistically be measured in a study. Maybe one of them happened to become friends with with a classmate that's really into literature and so they started reading a lot! Maybe they are both sensitive to sounds, but only one of them happens to live near an airport, disrupting their sleep at night.

It is not surprising that one particular set of monozygotic twins happens to markedly differ with respect to some traits. There are always outliers in large twin studies too, and researchers don't usually get that hung up about them because everyone knows there are countless factors involved. To be able to have any certainty about the effects of a particular factor you need scale that lets you separate them from the random noise. It's just basic statistics, like what is even anyone doing here. The study itself does make sense, but should be interpreted as extremely exploratory in nature, not something to draw any conclusions from. IMO the researchers themselves are irresponsible in this regard, as they speculate much more than what's warranted in the discussion and conclusions sections. Like, one of their conclusions is "They [the twins] also show that cultural climates can modify values.". First, that is something already widely known and accepted, but second and more importantly, that is not the kind of statement you should make based on a single pair of subjects.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 48 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

16 points, so about a standard deviation. That's big, but your own varience can be just as high; the original point of IQ is a measure of how well you'll do in school to detect who may need additional attention (and not an inherent intelligence) so later aged tests include more on knowledge base while earlier tests are more about things like pattern recognition, mental rotation, etc. Infact, it has to get recurved regularly as each generation tends to be roughly 10 or 15 points higher (although idk about gen Z).

All this is to say that a slump of 16 points doesn't have to be shit like lead poisoning or gas fumes (although that certainly doesn't help, and pollution matters), it can simply be the US education system isn't good at teaching students. Cross culture studies already show that, as do differences between the rich and the poor. Or hell, just playing Tetris raises IQ, lol.

It'd obviously help if this wasn't a click bait article, though. People wanting to know why need to read a lot of actual research to know the myriad of different things that impact IQ and not just "haha US stupid."

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 31 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

although idk about gen Z

💀

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I technically meant that in regards to not seeing the research lately, but... lol

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I thought it was hilarious, can't lie. But I don't think gen Z (or alpha, or beta, or whatever gen is the currently self-aware one) are unintelligent, I just think they have shit influence. Parents need to stay extra vigilant in this age.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Real talk the main driver of advances are usually healthier environments, better nutrition and access to knowledge (e g. Via tech). I don't think Z or alphas are getting better in those regards, kind of inheriting the opposite.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

You might be right on that, indeed. At least some countries are backpedaling hard on all of the above right now.

[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

The article says 7 points is standard in twins. So this is over twice what is normally seen

[–] troed@fedia.io 211 points 1 day ago (2 children)

the researchers note that the sister raised in the US had suffered three previous concussions

+

the twin raised in Korea described growing up in a loving and harmonious family home, the adopted sister reported a harsher upbringing, colored by regular conflict and the divorce of her adoptive parents

It does seem as if there would be explanations for the unusual difference.

https://www.iflscience.com/identical-twins-raised-in-the-us-and-korea-display-surprising-iq-variations-71357

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 131 points 1 day ago (11 children)

That's kind of an understatement. Three traumatic brain injuries is not exactly something that can be ignored when discussing differences in mental faculties.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago

It can be ignored if your only priority is dunking on America. I feel sorry for this young person being made into the poster child for everyone who would like to take America down a peg. Even the concussions will somehow get attributed to “the way things are there.”

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] WhiteRabbit@lemmy.today 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Right, this assertion is invalidated and agenda-driven.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I have children. The amount of trauma a two year old would experience losing their family, being transported to a foreign country and adopted by different people would be ~~traumatic~~intense as hell.

A two year old is not a newborn. That's their entire world blowing up.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 10 points 15 hours ago

Yeah you can basically completely disregard any other aspect in this study, right? 'massive trauma in early life has strong impact' is the real finding here, and that's hardly a new one

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

Luckily it's very local, time wise. I don't remember a thing from like 5 and earlier.

[–] Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Your anecdotal experience doesn't have anything to do with this if you weren't traumatized at a young age.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

My parents were divorced when I was about 2? Not "trauma" maybe, but you'd think it might be something I might remember. I dunno.

[–] undrwater@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Trauma doesn't always come with memories. You might have some form of PTSD response to the stressors the divorce caused.

Significant trauma are frequently suppressed in memory.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Could be that, too. I have a great relationship with both my parents though so I doubt it's PTSD in my particular case. Or at the very least I've had great support in subconsciously dealing with it, if anything. But still, yes!

[–] Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I would not think that, no.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Makes sense, if I don't remember it. But maybe it was just a calm separation.

[–] 93maddie94@lemm.ee 15 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Just because a person doesn’t have a memory of a traumatic event doesn’t mean it doesn’t affect them. Kids can have lasting trauma effects even from things they were too young to remember.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

while the other faced hardships with her adoptive family and parents

Does anyone have more info? Abuse, neglect, and malnutrition are proven to reduce IQ. So are the concussions referenced in the article. I would be dubious to make any statements on the back of a single case like this. This is not even outside the realm of possibility of twin IQ variance - albeit unlikely.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So is lead.

Using historical data on U.S. childhood blood-lead levels, leaded-gas use, and population statistics, they determined the likely lifelong burden of lead exposure carried by every American alive in 2015.

https://today.duke.edu/2024/12/20th-century-lead-exposure-damaged-american-mental-health

She looks pretty young, but still.

Also, just schooling, lol. US education sucks donkey dick

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

The headline alone just outright insults the other twin. lmao wtf

[–] noctivius@lemm.ee 53 points 1 day ago (21 children)
[–] Steve@communick.news 40 points 1 day ago

Yes. Contrary to current pop-sci thought, it's not actually useless bunk. Epically when differences reach into 2 digits.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I didn't realise it wasn't a thing anymore.

I know it's never been a good indicator of success or even cognitive abilities but it's still a thing that people try to measure.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 day ago

This summer, they're gonna get their parents back together!

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The sister raised in the US had an IQ 16 points lower than her sibling in Korea. Previous studies revealed that identical twins typically have no more than a 7-point IQ difference, making this case astounding.

load more comments
view more: next ›