this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1835 readers
397 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 3 points 1 hour ago

Got a nice and lengthy sneer from film blog That Final Scene: the uncanny valet is not your friend (and other AI stories)

Beyond being an utter castigation of AI bros' "attempts" at aping art, its also wonderfully written from start to finish. Go check it out.

[–] rook@awful.systems 5 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Here’s a fun one… Microsoft added copilot features to sharepoint. The copilot system has its own set of access controls. The access controls let it see things that normal users might not be able to see. Normal users can then just ask copilot to tell them the contents of the files and pages that they can’t see themselves. Luckily, no business would ever put sensitive information in their sharepoint system, so this isn’t a realistic threat, haha.

Obviously Microsoft have significant resources to research and fix the security problems that LLM integration will bring with it. So much money. So many experts. Plenty of time to think about the issues since the first recall debacle.

And this is what they’ve accomplished.

https://www.pentestpartners.com/security-blog/exploiting-copilot-ai-for-sharepoint/

[–] rwg@aoir.social 2 points 53 minutes ago

@rook @BlueMonday1984 wow. Why go to all the trouble of social engineering a company when you can just ask Copilot?

[–] ysegrim@furry.engineer 2 points 1 hour ago

@rook @BlueMonday1984 Maybe they have asked CoPilot to write the code that restricts access for CoPilot?

(Sometimes this future feels like 2001 A Space Odyssey, just as a farce. And without benevolent aliens.)

[–] WellsiteGeo@masto.ai 3 points 2 hours ago

@rook @BlueMonday1984

Thankfully I'm able to say "what is sharepoint?"

I did meet it once. A client used it in their office. But when they wanted us offshore (via satellite link) to contribute to it, it became awfully unstable, probably because of latency/ unstable data links.

It's M$. I doubt it has improved.

[–] rook@awful.systems 7 points 4 hours ago

They’re already doing phrenology and transphobia on the pope.

(screenshot of a Twitter post with dubious coloured lines overlaid on some photos of the pope’s head, claiming a better match for a “female” skull shape)

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

New eugenics conference just dropped

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/8ZExgaGnvLevkZxR5/attend-the-2025-reproductive-frontiers-summit-june-10-12

"Chatham House rules" so they can happily be racist without anyone pointing fingers at them.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 6 points 6 hours ago

the genomic emancipation of humanity

ffs, the euphemisms keep piling on today.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

broadcom continuing to make vmware even more unappealing

bit of a fucking weird thing to do, too. guess they’re going full oracle?

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 7 points 7 hours ago

subscriptionless vmware users

perpetual license holders

What a bunch of weird and off-putting ways to avoid saying owners of a product that they fucking bought.

The article is about broadcom sending cease and desists to vmware owners who download updates by the way, because apparently to be entitled to any kind of after sale support you need to be leasing the product.

[–] saucerwizard@awful.systems 6 points 12 hours ago

OT: Estonia (and Helsinki) were very nice, but I did not see a single delivery robot running around. Stayed across from the MalwareBytes HQ tho, I thought that was cool.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 13 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

https://xcancel.com/GuiveAssadi/status/1920232405324955825

Steven Pinker: I've been part of some not so successful attempts to come up with secular humanist substitutes for religion.

Interviewer: What is the worst one you've been involved in?

Steven Pinker: Probably the rationalist solstice in Berkeley, which included hymns to the benefits of global supply chains. I mean, I actually completely endorse the lyrics of the song, but there's something a bit cringe about the performance.

from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTVJjmabaas which nobody should watch, obviously

[–] saucerwizard@awful.systems 6 points 12 hours ago

I want to make a CoE joke or something but jesus christ you really can’t improve on this.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 10 points 14 hours ago

hymns to the benefits of global supply chains

We did it, we discovered awful's equivalent to Nostalgia Critic's The Wall

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 9 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Polymarket on the new pope skeet

Also there already is a bsky user with the username leoxiv, who makes from what I can tell final fantasy poses, some nsfw. Lol.

Skeet descriptionG Elliott Morris ‪@gelliottmorris.com‬ :"A mere 2 hours ago, betting markets were giving the now Pope a 0% chance of becoming Pope. Lmfao"

[–] BigMuffin69@awful.systems 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

When the cubbies won the series, I knew it meant that Trump 2016 was a lock. A Chicago pope can only mean Trump 2028 confirmed 😭

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 5 points 13 hours ago

No, no, the Gays are fine actually. What I really hate is ketchup.

--God, probably

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 8 points 18 hours ago

Also there already is a bsky user with the username leoxiv, who makes from what I can tell final fantasy poses, some nsfw. Lol.

Being a bit more specific, its Final Fantasy XIV, which you've probably heard about from people using its free trial as meme material. Its also a better example of the metaverse than any actual metaverse out there, but that's a given for literally any MMO that has popped up for the last twenty fucking years.

Also:

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 12 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

What if we throw the CEO into a peat bog when the company underperforms?

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BigMuffin69@awful.systems 8 points 17 hours ago

finger guns activated 🟩 👉👉

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 12 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

I know the Rationalists tend to like (or used to) Freakonomics (contrarians recognize contrarians), and the Freakonomics podcast (there always is a podcast isn't there), so I was amused to see the YT channel 'Unlearning Economics', do a 'The Death of Freakonomics' episode.

Honestly I think his whole channel is pretty damn good if you want to see someone with actual chops - here meaning an economics doctorate and an encyclopedic memory for The Simpsons memes - dig into the research in a way that effectively balances depth and approachability. The first one of his that I remember was an examination of Pinker's use and abuse of data in his radical optimist manifesto that I can't remember the title of.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 11 points 22 hours ago

Obligatory: If books could kill was started because they wanted to do a freakonomics takedown, lol. It’s their first ep.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 10 points 1 day ago

Found a sneer in the wild, made in response to another piece of Deportee Slop™:

Searching through the quotes, I also found someone openly accusing AI of contributing to fascism:

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

some thiel news, in which the tiny little man keeps trailblazing being the absolute weirdest motherfucker:

He has found religion recently. I don’t know if you’ve been following this, but Peter Thiel is now running Bible study groups in Silicon Valley.

now you may read this and already start straining your eyes, so I strongly suggest you warm up before you read with the rest of the paragraph, which continues:

He said in a few interviews recently that he believes that the Antichrist is Greta Thunberg. It’s extraordinary. He said that it’s foretold that the Antichrist will be seeming to spread peace. But here’s his thinking. He says Greta wants everyone to ride a bicycle. (Now, that’s a gross caricature of what she’s said.) But he’s said Greta wants everyone to ride a bicycle. That may seem good, but the only way that could happen is if there was a world government that was regulating it. And that is more evil than the effects of climate change.

[–] istewart@awful.systems 8 points 13 hours ago

It is very important to notice and continually point out that these people appear to believe more fervently in their chosen demons than they do in their proclaimed god

[–] saucerwizard@awful.systems 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Does anyone know what church Thiel is involved with? I’ve heard catholic as well as evangelical…like are they making an exception to the gay marriage because he’s rich??

[–] corbin@awful.systems 2 points 8 hours ago

Thiel isn't known to be among any laity. He was raised as some flavor of evangelical fundie and follows a specific philosopher, René Girard. He generally hasn't gotten a pass on being queer from the wider Christian community, and if you want to hear some psychoanalysis of his closet then you might enjoy the relevant Behind the Bastards: How Peter Thiel Became the Gravedigger of Democracy.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As a Dutch person, why can't yall be normal about bikes? Just invest in separate bike lanes and protect people on bicycles from drivers (I really need to write out my ~~manifesto~~ blog post on how I think car ownership turns you into a psychopath one day). It isn't that hard. (Shoutout to the couple who was crossing the Houtribdijk (actually a dam, not a dike) on bikes last week)

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 13 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I remember seeing a particularly stupid libertarian guy argue against public transport by saying that car owners would lose out because the value of having a car would decrease. I think it’s a crab in a bucket type mentality. Everyone should suffer from cars. I blame Big Car for this.

[–] FredFig@awful.systems 9 points 22 hours ago

Hey that's unfair, us North Americans are as normal about bikes as we're normal about cars.

[–] mountainriver@awful.systems 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hm, I don't believe in biblical apocalypse stuff, but if I did I wouldn't think that the climate activist gambling her life to get supplies to the starving population in Gaza is the anti-christ.

I think a power hungry, wannabe vampire, billionaire with companies named after corrupting artifacts, more fits the bill.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

The anti-christ also needs to be universally liked iirc. And the Catholic church explicitly bans calling out a time (and thus a person) as the anti-christ. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Council_of_the_Lateran if by a miracle I'm declared Pope (which is technically possible (yes, im unironically linking to r/neoliberal, it was one of the first hits on google, but I'm never beating the accusations)) I will excom all these people, Oprah giving out cars style. (vote for me you cowards).

Re: the white smoke, anyway, still available to become an antipope at reasonable rates.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that handy old adage: every accusation a projection!

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 11 points 20 hours ago

I’m gonna be real disappointed if thiel is the anti-christ. Like disappointed in the writing and narrative of the universe

[–] mii@awful.systems 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Road rage victim 'speaks' via AI at his killer's sentencing [Archive]

I fucking can't right now.

[Judge] Lang allowed Pelkey's loved ones to play an AI-generated version of the victim — his face and body and a lifelike voice that appeared to ask the judge for leniency.

“To Gabriel Horcasitas, the man who shot me: It is a shame we encountered each other that day in those circumstances," the artificial version of Pelkey said. "In another life, we probably could have been friends. I believe in forgiveness."

Edit: 404Media article on the story that's much better

[–] zogwarg@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is beyond horrifying:

I don't know to decide wether I should be glad this wasn't show to a jury, or sad we don't get an obvious mistrial setting some kind of precedent against this kind of demented ventriquolism act, indirectly asking for maximum sentencing through what should be completely inadmissible character testimony.

Does anyone here know how 'appeals on sentencing' vs 'appeals on verdicts', obviously judges should have some leeway, but do they have enough leeway to say (In court) that they were moved for example by what a spirit medium said or whatnot, is there some jurisprudence there?

I can only hope that the video played an insignificant role in the judges decision, and it was some deranged—post hoc—emotional—waxing 'poetic' moment for the judge.

Yuck.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 11 points 1 day ago

Story goes he got an extra year of prison and the judge mentioned the ai testimony.

If I ever get murdered in the USA and my ai fake is not shouting about jury nullification you know it isnt the real me.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

does anyone know who the company who did the AI video was? This reeks of PR.

[–] mii@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I tried to find that out but it doesn't seem to be mentioned in any of the articles. However, searching for the names associated with it (wife, brother-in-law, and the third business partner) brings up "Kadima Ventures" from Arizona, which has these three names listed as management. However, information about that company beyond some weird mentions and a LinkedIn profile seems to be scarce (and the AZ business registry is either down right now or not accessible from where I am).

I looked again and found a 404 article on the whole story that's better and has more info than the one I linked before, though. I'm adding that to the original post.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Absolute chicanery.

load more comments
view more: next ›