this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
408 points (97.4% liked)

News

29127 readers
4655 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump on Wednesday acknowledged that his tariffs could result in fewer and costlier products in the United States, saying American kids might “have two dolls instead of 30 dolls,” but he insisted China will suffer more from his trade war.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 hours ago

If he understood anything about his electorate, he would know that it would be a choice of 1 meal a day instead of 3, if the rent is still paid.

[–] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Why isn’t it “rich people will have 1 yacht rather than 4”?

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Because you keep your yachts in the Caribbean so they aren’t subject to tariffs anyway

[–] Nagrom@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago

Let them eat cake!

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

Goddamn fucking piece of shit fucking moron

[–] Bojack411@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago

"The american people will suffer but china will suffer more." So hes hurting us to hurt them? Great job dumbass.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 15 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

but he insisted China will suffer more from his trade war.

Even if this were true (which is dubious) this doesn't make me feel any better. That would simply make this a Pyrrhic victory.

What is the point of any of this? Oh yeah, cruelty is the point.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Nah, raising a shitload of money fast for tax breaks to pay off the billionaires who handed him the presidency is the point. Cruelty is why idiots would vote for this

[–] GreenSkree@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

The point? I think he expected the world leaders to come bearing personal gifts and favors. Trade some of the US's global position and power for his own personal wealth and power? I don't have proof, but it would be on-brand for Trump.

He's also surrounded himself with yes-men and crazy people (e.g. Navarro). He clearly has an elementary understanding (at best) of economics. Money good. China bad. Money go to China bad (trade imbalance). Tariffs keep money here.

Combine all that with the fact that he never admits responsibility for anything. When China pushed back, he retaliated. When they stopped participating, it leaves us in a stalemate that I believe will hurt us a lot more than them.

So, I think the trade imbalance is the justification. The goal is likely just personal power for Trump. But he doesn't really know what he's doing, doesn't care to learn, just thinking he's the greatest being in existence and everything bad is not his fault.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What about the kids who were lucky to get 2 dolls prior to the trade war? Shit outta luck I guess.

[–] timmy_dean_sausage@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Just tell them kids in China have negative dolls. That will make them feel better!

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Trump has a plan for them too. The coal mines.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Florida is already making it normal for children to be the future workforce.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

They get to BECOME the doll of some rich kid. You woke people really hate freedom.

Reminds me of middle-age tales where when a princeling disobeyed his whipping-boy would get beat.

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except the kids aren't getting 2 dolls. They're getting dragged out into the middle of the street half naked in the middle of the night because the brownshirts can't even read an address correctly when they're casually disappearing whole families.

Why the fuck is this even reported on. Fuck this whole system, down to the author that thought 'ya that's worth making an article'

Don't buy your kids dolls. Buy them fpv drones.

[–] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago

Sadly, this probably concerns the average voter more than all the Nazi shit...

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

China is happily selling to the rest of the world, and yes their sales will go down without the US market, but they won't in sense of the word "suffer".

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

Yeah, I'm sure China's trembling at the mere idea.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Can't wait to see what happens when China stops buying our debt.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

2 dolls instead of 30 works out to a reduction of 93.3%! That's HUGE. If that's supposed to be his positive spin on things, Americans are truly fucked.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

It really shows that he doesn't care about Americans, he cares about punishing and attacking people that he doesn't like. That is all that matters to him, and he doesn't hide that. He doesn't want to make things better, he wants to make people suffer.

The fact that he has supporters is absolutely unfathomable to me. Then again, those same supporters want to punish the same people he does, so it starts to make sense.

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

He wants to punish Americans more than probably anyone else. Americans had the nerve to laugh at him when people joked about his hair, or makeup, or physique. Americans did not elect him in 2020. Americans allowed him to be forced out and didnt fight back hard enough when Biden "stole" the election. Americans allowed him to have some minor inconveniences when they put him on trial, raided his house for classified docs or made him take reaponsibility for his actions. Americans are going to pay because he knows nothing other than vengence for percieved slights and Americans allowed them all to happen

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Donny "2 dolls" trump.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A real "let them eat cake" moment.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's the real statement. Instead of 30 dolls it will be 2, but that translates to food supplies, too. Instead of 30 dinners in a month, we'll only have 2.

In the year after Maduro took over Venezuela, the average citizen lost 40 pounds.

[–] bizzle@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I could stand to lose 40 pounds honestly

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Suffering is the point

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Cause American girls were getting 30 dolls every Christmas.

This guy is such a psychopath that he doesn't even understand how Christmas gifts work.

[–] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Big "How much could a banana cost? $10?" moment

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

The rich will still get 30 and a new sports car

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We are already at a family video game for the kids to share and a really good dinner for the week.

[–] lemonbun@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

doesn't sound like you're sacrificing enough. good dinner should be monthly

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 2 points 1 day ago

This is Christmas Dinner. Once a year 😭

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Carjacklavinder@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except a doll is $10 for the crappiest model, meaning were already only getting two dolls in the average budget. With that logic, we'll have to save up for the doll parts and assemble a single doll ourselves.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

It's one doll, Michael, how much could it cost? 10 dollars?

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 day ago (4 children)

China's economy is still projected to grow while US heads to recession , this guy tries to create his own reality everywhere he goes.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

China has the whole world they still can sell to. The US has shut the door on all existing and potential partners

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 99 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Even if this were true, a policy that hurts everyone isn't sucessful just because someone else suffers more than you.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

It is for Republicans

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When your worldview is completely transactional, and you believe that literally everything is zero-sum, then you do view that as successful.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Cutting off your nose to spite China

[–] Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world 150 points 1 day ago (22 children)

People are going to die in the streets due to the impact of these policies.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't understand the hard on the right has for China yet they benefit greatly from China's low costs. As soon as the USSR fell and Islamic fundamentalism faded away I just knew the US would be looking for a new boogeyman to keep us distracted and justify defense spending.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The fact that they call it a defense budget and not a military budget kind of says it all too.

I'm all for actually defending your country, of course, but yeah...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is an anti-consumerism Trump on anyone's bingo card??

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 1 points 5 hours ago

Didn't you know that consumerism is not conservatism? No? Neither did I, but the ~~good~~ people of r/conservative think so all of the sudden. Somehow.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Bad luck for the ones who could only afford two to start with huh?

load more comments
view more: next ›