97

Most stuff that gets posted here is just horrible and bleak shit, so here's some catastrophically absurd libertarian brainworms instead.

And this is why I say we have a duty to make the cheap ones and fly them anyway. The laws which make this the case are equivalent to those which made people walk in front of early cars waving flags. Between our current fear of any risk, and the vested interests of the powers that be in existing transportation, the flying car will never happen until someone builds one anyway, and allows everyone else to follow in there footsteps.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 42 points 1 year ago

considering the vast majority of drivers can barely handle two axes without being a danger to others, adding in more is a very bad idea

[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

It's pretty hard to hold two axes while driving.

[-] FumpyAer@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Yaw and roll would be too much.

[-] macerated_baby_presidents@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

well really it would be pitch that's new. Cars control yaw (tire scrub), motorcycles and bikes additionally control roll (leaning).

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Gonna be so fun trying to teach your average burger about elevator control authority versus airspeed

[-] macerated_baby_presidents@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ngl this one seems like it has relatively simple analogies. Flying at low speeds looks similar to driving in low traction conditions: need to make larger control inputs for same effect, but too large and you'll just stall/skid. Available control choices are narrowed. Of course most people are bad winter drivers and you need to practice to get good at it.

3D "rules of the road" would be much funnier. Getting smashed to pieces by a flying Escalade that blew the 8-way stop sign

[-] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

I'm certain that I understand the Bayesian False Confidence theorem correctly, and it says that the more you increase your degree of freedom (axes), the lower the risk of collision, so jot that down.

[-] Donk240978@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 year ago

We have flying cars... They are called helicopters... The new ones are just oversized drones (helicopters with more propellers).

Besides, Joe Average Potato-brain can't drive for shit and now you want 2 tonnes of shit falling out of the sky when some idiot fucks up?

[-] regul@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

Car crashes are one of the leading causes of death for several demographics. You could easily argue we should still be carrying flags.

[-] Shinji_Ikari@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

Oh my god I love tiny helicopter quacks.

ar15 forum post featuring libertarians trying to find the philosophical limit to "a man should be able to do anything they want on their property"

the result

The forum changed its theme and everything is fucked but its one of my favorite internet interactions of all time.

[-] LanyrdSkynrd@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's right up there with the bodybuilding.com thread where the guy couldn't understand that 7/2=3.5

I hate HOA busybodies as much as the next guy, but those libertarians are crazy. They actually expected OP to do nothing about his next door neighbor trying to teach himself to fly a helicopter. They were saying he should wait until the rotors are flying onto his property, otherwise he hates freedom.

My favorite detail is that he spent $40k of his $100k scratch off lotto winnings on it.

[-] Shinji_Ikari@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

The whole story is just unbelievable at every step, yet OP continues to provide proof to counter it.

[-] Judge_Jury@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago
[-] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

Move fast and lithobreak the helicopter I made out of scrap in my garage.

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

They also have moral obligations to make their own deep sea submersibles out of bargain basement carbon fiber.

[-] Yurt_Owl@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

You want flying cars. I want flying trains. We are not the same.

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

flying trains

maglev coming for ya train-shining

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

One commenter “you could power them with a generator”

Ok yeah let me get my Mr Fusion hooked right up, jeez why didn’t I think of that

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

Moral duty to build a flying machine to defy an oppressive regime you say?

[-] nightshade@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

This is why flying cars are one of my least favorite sci-fi tropes. Clearest example of just replicating the present world but in a futuristic way.

On that note, apparently flying cars are one of Trump's 2024 campaign promises.

[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

the flying car already exists! it's called the hot air balloon, and it is piloted only by those of upstanding moral character.

[-] Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 1 year ago

planes were as dangerous as cars they wouldn't be allowed to exist.

Hmmm, that doesn’t say anything about cars, does it? 🚙⃠

[-] Tofu_Lewis@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Commercial airlines are like trains - that's why they're safe.

Small personal aircraft are like cars - they crash ALL THE FUCKING TIME.

[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

they're the most irritating dorks on the planet but I honestly love libertarians. their fantasy world is so whimsical.

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Lol, had me in the first half of the title. Thought they were calling for an airborne people's war.

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Anyone who believes flying cars are even remotely possible has obviously spent zero time at all looking into basically anything, from the technology to the FAA regulations that make it illegal (love seeing these techbro morons think they can skirt around regulations only to immediately be hit with an illegal charter fine and shut down). Without fail, their triumphant “certification” is a restricted/experimental airworthiness certificate that you can’t see for an aircraft that nobody has seen either. What this means is they can’t do anything for hire and can’t have more than six passengers among a host of other shit. They also cannot operate internationally. Anyone and their mother can get an experimental airworthiness certificate.

Have they considered that you still need to be licensed to fly, how expensive and difficult that is? Seriously, “airmen practical tests” (as they call them) are fucking hard! It’s not like a drivers license where they hand them out like candy, you have to actually work for it. The standards document is over 100 pages and you need to ace every single task. A single mistake is an automatic failure and the test costs 800 bucks a pop! And did I mention that examiners are few and far between and you’ll likely be waiting two months between scheduling and taking the test?

And you can’t just get in a plane and fly like you get in a car and drive. There is so much paperwork and logging shit and fixing and checking that needs to be done, and if you want to leave the US you better have five hours to spare pouring over the exact obscure documents you need to fill out and spend hours on hold to speak to a customs agent.

So much convenience!

And let’s call this what it is, a blatant attempt to circumvent aviation safety regulations with their smarmy lawyering bullshit. I’ve known a few FAA inspectors in my life and they don’t fuck around. There’s been a thousand techbros before them that have tried going “well ackshually” only to be told to shut the fuck up and to take their VC money from whence they came.

Perhaps the generator could be on the ground?

lmao. this must be a bit

[-] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

This was basically the hovercars in a driving game, Quarantine. It was super dystopian, would not recommend.

[-] 0xE60@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

trueanon rule: Never get in a helicopter

[-] TheDialectic@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, hear me out. If there were personal dirigible the world would be a better place.

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

The laws which make this the case are equivalent to those which made people walk in front of early cars waving flags.

A good idea?

[-] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Dudes rock.

Are they related to that rock-brained goofball who decided to make his own one-man rocket that was nowt but a Wile. E. Coyote-style firework-with-a-chair?

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
97 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15917 readers
11 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS