this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
168 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3234 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A band of House Republicans made a historic move this week to punish their own leader, sending the House into chaos by ousting Kevin McCarthy as speaker. The unprecedented vote to oust McCarthy has only led to more turmoil in the days since as Republicans have grappled with the fallout of the speaker-less House.

On Thursday, former President Donald Trump was rumored to be going to Capitol Hill and floated the possibility of serving as speaker for a “short period of time” – a highly improbable idea. Then he abruptly changed course and scrapped those plans, endorsing Rep. Jim Jordan instead.

On Friday morning, a candidate forum on Fox News with Jordan and Majority Leader Steve Scalise was announced for Monday. By midday, furious backlash from GOP rank-and-file caused both to pull out from the event.

And McCarthy provided his own whipsaw Friday afternoon, when a flurry of reports emerged that he would resign after a new speaker was chosen. He quickly denied to reporters that he had any plans to leave before the end of his term.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You know who would make a great speaker if the house? Liz Truss.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes... the old "putting out fire with gasoline" approach

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually, lettuce is fire resistant.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

When it's this dry at this point?

[–] negativenull@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Liz Cheney!

[–] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I know this isn't going to happen, but at least 5-6 Republicans should vote for Hakeem Jeffries. If the speaker vote isn't going to end, that's their only choice to ease suffering. Meanwhile, I'll just be laughing.

[–] TubeTalkerX@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then Fox News could blame the Democrat-led House for not getting anything passed!

[–] Hoomod@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They blame the democrats anyways

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Honestly hoping for it. The MAGA crew is going for full dysfunction so they'll stonewall as much as possible. I highly doubt the next speaker will make the concessions mccarthy did, so the best bet to seat a speaker and avoid the endless voting and looming shutdown is to vote for a dem.

No matter how this ends, the Republicans will look even weaker than they already do, so I'm just gonna watch with popcorn.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A candidate forum on Fox News for speaker, lol
What nonsense. I guess that's the only way to get Trump senpai to notice them.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Trump already endorsed Jim Jordan.

[–] thegreatgarbo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Remember a couple three decades ago when we would shake our heads at the chaos of Italian politics with coalitions, porn stars, and nazis? We were so superior.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Fuck ‘em.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Over the past four days, Scalise and Jordan have racked up endorsements from their allies to try to position themselves as the consensus GOP candidate heading into next week’s secret ballot in the Republican conference to be the next speaker.

Trump is also paying close attention to another leadership race, according to sources familiar with the former president’s thinking: House GOP Whip Tom Emmer, who is running to succeed Scalise as majority leader if he moves up the ladder.

Democrats have limited options after they played their hand Tuesday by declining to come to McCarthy’s rescue, and now await whoever emerges as the next speaker – and their negotiating partner with the threat of a shutdown still looming a little more than a month away.

He outlined his case for the speakership on social media Friday, arguing he can build a unifying coalition and naming some top priorities that are big issues on the right: the so-called weaponization of the government, spending cuts and border security.

There’s also a faction of Republicans – particularly those vulnerable in districts President Joe Biden won – concerned about what’s going to happen in mid-November, when the stopgap spending bill that McCarthy helped pass with Democratic votes expires.

Jeffries wrote a Washington Post op-ed on Friday defending Democrats’ decision to vote out McCarthy, saying Republicans rejected making bipartisan changes to the House rules.


The original article contains 1,760 words, the summary contains 229 words. Saved 87%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!