this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
314 points (99.4% liked)

politics

28174 readers
2451 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Artist Sarah Boardman said her 41-year art career is at risk after Donald Trump accused her of distorting his likeness in a 2019 portrait displayed in the Colorado State Capitol.

Trump called for its removal in a March 23 Truth Social post, prompting Republican lawmakers to have it taken down the next day.

Boardman denied political bias and said the portrait was pre-approved. She reported a sharp decline in business and backlash, though her family and supporters defended her online.

Boardman had also painted Barack Obama and George W. Bush.

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 113 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Honestly she used modest flattery. Be happy she didnt draw your triple neckgina fold.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I know. I don't get the problem wih it, it looks fine to me. If anything it humanized him a bit, it looks a bit softer than his official portrait....

.... oh wait, now I get it. Dude must be so insecure in his manhood that he rejects anything that he thinks makes him look soft.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 20 points 10 months ago

It's hideous and inaccurate by not being hideous enough, let's not beat around the bush.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Necklabia. And extreme contrast between is orange skin and is sickly white skin isn't seen in the portrait too

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Orangina with a side of fatty bacon

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

That's his neck

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 40 points 10 months ago

When will people learn to not have anything to do with the orange orangutang.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

She did distort his likeness. His hair is way more fucked than that.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Funny. I don't even think it looks that bad. He looks worse in person.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I think it was Jon Stewart that asks....does he think his pictures are flattering?

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Maybe that's the distortion 🤔

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not as good a likeness as Bush's or Obama's paintings she made, but it's not far off and he looks healthier and younger in her painting than in real life, but whatever dude.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

not orange enough, so it doesnt look like him, also the neckgina thing hes hiding.

[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If anything, he looks better in the portrait than irl. His narcissistic addled brain thinks he doesn't look disgusting...but he seriously fucking does.

[–] 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website 15 points 10 months ago

I daresay he almost looks.... Stately in the portrait. It's like a look into an alternate reality where Trump was loved by his father and got into politics out a desire to serve his country, and were he's also done the bare minimum to care for himself for the past 79 years.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

My guess would be he hates that she put gray in his hair and wrinkles around his eyes

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

I so very wish they had just ignored his rantings and ravings. Just completely do no comment and refuse to take any action, but most importantly, do not take it down, and do not offer to replace it. Nothing.

Would have been hilarious to see him get more and more angry over a big fat nothing.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Thank you for the correction

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Republicans are the snowflakes and while not surprising, just absolutely pathetic and sad.

The portrait looked a shit ton better than how he looks in real life but we all know that the fragile Republican, male especially, will be hurt of the portrait isn't AI generated to artificially make him look like a comic book hero and isn't as fat and sickly looking that he actually is.

[–] ef9357@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why would he object to a picture that makes him look like a normal human? I mean, it looks way better than he normally does IRL.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

man definitely has some issues with how he sees himself

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So if he's falsely claiming that she intentionally made him look bad, isn't that slander?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You could say it is a bad portrait because it does not show how shitty he really looks.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 4 points 10 months ago

It's a very generous portrait

[–] Zess@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Her life is probably in peril considering how fucking unhinged trumpets can be.

[–] Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean, Trump has a point here. That portrait is barely recognizable as being him... way too normal looking, not enough orange blotches around the face, hair looks attached instead of combed over, and she definitely wasn't able to capture that maniacal glint in his eyes.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

also the contrast between his orange skin and his white pastey skin is not as prominent in the portrait.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Since she's now doing the time, she might as well have done the crime.

Should have been more like this - Rubble Rubble!

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

She didn't have enough orange paint.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I am reminded of those poor artists that had to paint the portrait of vial dictators, Hitler, Putin, Stalin.

Afraid if the portrait is not approved they'll be shipped off to the gulag, internment camp or the front lines.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

vial dictators

Laboratories HATE them

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

The artist should add a toothbrush mustache and more fucking orange.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Just smear some Cheeto dust over it and he'll be happy.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago

Who does he think he is? Winston Churchill?

[–] Bristingr@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Since the Colorado Governor put an image of himself in the form of South Park, they should go get a picture of Mr. Garrison too since he wants it redone.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That sucks. Hopefully she gets some filthy rich patron to prop her up so she can flip donvict and his ilk the bird...

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I bet lots of rich people would be happy to buy paintings she intentionally altered.