this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
1568 points (97.0% liked)

Science Memes

12952 readers
1593 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1568
nets (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 6 days ago

nets serving their purpose long after EOL, except noone is being served.

I wish modern day electronics did as well and they could serve someone.

[–] Obelix@feddit.org 174 points 1 week ago (29 children)

Just FYI:

Single-use plastic products are used once, or for a short period of time, before being thrown away. Under the EU’s rules on single-use plastics, the EU is tackling the 10 single-use plastic items most commonly found on Europe’s beaches and is promoting sustainable alternatives. The 10 items are

Cotton bud sticks 
Cutlery, plates, straws and stirrers 
Balloons and sticks for balloons 
Food containers 
Cups for beverages 
Beverage containers 
Cigarette butts 
Plastic bags 
Packets and wrappers 
Wet wipes and sanitary items 

https://commission.europa.eu/news/less-plastic-waste-means-cleaner-beaches-2024-08-14_en

So yeah, nets are bad, but straws, plastic bags, cigarettes and packages are also a problem.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 72 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People want to pretend just the things that are convenient to them are an issue. They say government and companies need to take action, then complain about actions taken. It's really wild to see.

[–] Azteh@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not throwing my garbage in the wild makes me have no idea how often straws end up in the ocean, so it seemed like a wild thing to go after.

Any idea if it's people dumping all this stuff in the wild or if it's because we throw it out in our bins that it somehow gets to the ocean?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 143 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 87 points 1 week ago

No, someone else is doing something worse than me so I'm absolved. I can do what I want.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, I simultaneously want to comment that the left panels are a wild fantasy, as I've never seen an actual human say that we should focus on plastic straws. As far as I can tell, that's propaganda put into the world by companies trying to discredit genuine efforts.

But at the same time, it's not even like you have to focus on straws. You can simply not use them, because it is just a stupid concept to produce something that's immediately trash, and then also go and do other things in life. Believe it or not, most activities in life don't involve straws.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 98 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

Plastic Recycling is Largely A Myth.

The world produces an average of 430 million metric tons of plastic each year. The United States alone produces tens of millions of tons of plastic waste annually. Yet on average, only about 5 to 6 percent of plastic in the U.S. is recycled.

Basically, the vast majority of plastic either literally cannot be recycled, at all, or would be astoundingly expensive to properly seperate according to it's different types and run through the recycling process.

... So, in most cases, it isn't, and just ends up in a landfill or being directly dumped into nature.

Oil companies have known this for decades, and, as with other issues surrounding pollution ... they've promoted anything that makes an individual feel guilty when they know that even if all individuals followed the suggested course of action, it would have a negligible impact.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] HungryJerboa@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 week ago (4 children)

But aside from donating to NGOs dedicated to cleaning up ocean litter, the average person has very little way to reduce the number of plastic nets in the water. It requires lifting fishermen out of poverty, teaching them more sustainable fishing practices, and cracking down on littering, all things that require international cooperation.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 91 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It requires lifting fishermen out of poverty

Bruh. These aren't 1 dude in a boat with a long line. These are billion dollar corporations running fleets. And yes, we need international cooperation to bring them to heel. Like with farmers, however, make no mistake that the people doing this kind of pollution are at all ignorant or unaware of what they are doing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (11 children)

the average person has very little way to reduce the number of plastic nets in the water

Besides the obvious and 100% viable option of just not eating fish.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 54 points 1 week ago (4 children)

On an unrelated notes, a huge fraction of oceanic microplastics is from car tyres. Driving is a number one source of oceanic microplastic.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 38 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Car tyres are also significant contributors to terrestial microplastics and particulate matter!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 45 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I am all for minimizing/eliminating single use plastics. But when i get served a milkshake in a plastic mug, with a plastic lid, and a plastic spoon, but a paper straw because of "save the sea"...

i just wish we used our brains more.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (36 children)

Just stop eating fish.

No need for nets.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 week ago (9 children)

stop eating all animals tbh.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The worst thing about paper straws is seeing it poked through a plastic lid.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But what if we pass the responsibility down to the consumer instead of dealing with industrial waste that's often more of a matter of cost than practicality?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

to be fair that was a regulator decision. they seem to have went for the low hanging fruit of something relatively easy to replace without impacting the bottom line.

not gonna save the world by a long shot, but its a better than nothing sort of deal im surprised they even bothered with in the first place.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My conspiracy theory is it was chosen to deliberately harm the optics of environmentalists. Something with minimal useful impact and maximum inconvenience would turn people against the whole idea of environmentally friendly alternatives.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

thats not something i do not shy away from. those fucks are that manipulative.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›