250
Shut the fuck up, Donny. You're out of your element.
Sweet reference bro 👌 👍 👏
Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man
Yes - he must face whatever penalties are appropriate and justified.
Exactly as the Jan. 6 participants and organizers must face whatever penalties are appropriate and justifed.
Pleased (if surprised) to see that we're in agreement on that, Donny.
So a guy with 91 charges has an opinion on the law? Let the penalty suit the crime. Its a misdemeanor. Let Jeffries chew his ass and be done with it on the congressional end.
Let Jeffries chew his ass and be done with it
I feel like you out an important word.
Whether chewing or eating, following it with “out” definitely changes the implied meaning.
Trump and the GOP’s desperation to try to equate everything to Trump’s insurrection is as transparent as it is pathetic and ineffectual.
Yeah, but isn't this saying the people on January 6th are criminals? I mean he's probably too stupid to realize it, but isn't that what he's saying?
Kinda but not really. He’s saying IF they’re criminals, Bowman is also just as bad of a criminal.
It’s like the child that gets in trouble for something serious, so they tell on their sibling for something much more benign and demand they get the same punishment. They aren’t admitting guilt, just making a false equivalence because misery loves company.
Everyone knows treason deserves the same punishment as a school student pulling a prank.
I think it's dangerous to think of him as stupid. He's undoubtedly stupid. But he's also cunning in the same way a raccoon is. It's not raw intelligence, it's some kind of freak skill at saying what others want to hear. And his reward isn't getting into a garbage can in an alley, it's attention. He loves it.
So thinking of him as stupid is dangerous. Because when he gets attention, there's a segment that want that same attention and get it by being more extreme and acting. Something Trump can't do on his own (again, too stupid, lazy, and incompetent) but he can make others do his bidding.
And there's something about that ignorant, blind grasping for negative attention torn from a toddlers playbook but fueled by shitty beer, childhood trauma, and macho bravado mistaken for actual motivation that can be deadly.
False equivalence fallacy.
It's hypernormalizing and unfortunately it's been pretty effective.
While at the same time trying to pretend that the insurrectionists were just "peaceful tourists who have been railroaded by evil Democrats."
The longer he stays out of prison, the more crimes he’ll commit.
Jamaal just has to do what every other maga-repub would do...say he did it for a completely different reason
"I smelled smoke!"
There, problem solved
"I smelled smoke!"
The smoke his Republican colleagues blew up Trump's ass, that is.
Classic CONservative.
“Jan 6th was a tourist visit”
“Jail fire-alarm-puller for the same crimes as Jan 6th insurrection”
"And fellow New York Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, a Republican, said on X that she’ll introduce a resolution to expel Bowman from the House over the incident. "This is the United States Congress, not a New York City high school. This action warrants expulsion & I’m introducing a resolution to do just that," she wrote."
Hold up. So pulling a fire alarm is worthy of being kicked out of Congress, but repeatedly showing porn to Congress is fine. Huh...
Convicted rapist says what now?
Conservatives create horrible situations that require desperate solutions.
People employ desperate solutions.
Conservatives blame them for being forced into desperate solutions.
I don't know whether to downvote this so as not to further broadcast Trump's lunacy, or upvote it to remind others of Trump's lunacy.
Ignore your opposition at your peril. Mock him all you can.
Good idea. How about this.. "So Trump agrees that he should be prosecuted for Jan. 6th?"
That really does seem to be what he's implying. I don't think he realizes it though.
Can someone please just shut this fucking clown up?
Bowman set off a public uproar on Saturday when he triggered the fire alarm on a door at the the Cannon House Office while his fellow Democrats were trying to delay the vote for the bill to avert a government shutdown. The congressman admitted to activating the alarm, but denied trying to delay the vote, saying he was “mistakenly thinking it would open the door. I regret this and sincerely apologize for any confusion this caused.”
Bowman is facing an investigation over the incident while conservatives are moving to have him censured or expelled from Congress.
I'm not saying Bowman should be put in prison, but come on, man. We all know what fire alarms look like. They're red, and they say "FIRE" on them in big white letters. Investigation is appropriate.
Innocent until what now?
Investigation is appropriate.
Until you’re stupid enough to pull a fire alarm in the middle of a high stakes congressional session.
He either delayed a vote intentionally, or is a dumbass. Neither have place in Congress. And I am a democratic voter.
My favorite part about this whole scandal is how republicans for once have evidence (the photo/video) for something they are complaining about, so it is everywhere!
But the fact that all that other proof about much more serious things is still “coming soon” doesn’t register as odd with their supporters…
Is pulling the fire alarm a fine or jail? Should definitely get the maximum penalty whatever it was. I can agree with trump in that he should be punished. Both of them
AFAIK he did it so the senate could actually read the bill they're voting on. By delaying the vote he gave them at least some time to know what they were signing.
Called it.
The same insurrectionists that were flashing white power symbols and holding confederate flags.
Voters will just put someone else in who's just like him, so... I guess make the trade. The j6 rioters weren't elected officials and Trump lost the election. So, it's not really a winning strategy or even tactic for the maga gop.
What was that thing again? An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind? I dont remember.
this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
250 points (90.1% liked)
politics
19159 readers
4523 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS