this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
565 points (96.8% liked)

Memes

55430 readers
680 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] craftyindividual@lemm.ee 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] squilox@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 years ago

Urrgrrrbbll

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 23 points 2 years ago
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] 15liam20@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

What do you mean?

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 years ago
[–] lars@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

It is indeed a word.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

This is news to Us.

[–] AffineConnection@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

much like "therefor", which does not mean the same thing as "therefore"

[–] BibiTofu@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well shit. I never knew what "ostensibly" meant. I thought it was a direct equivalent to the French "ostensiblement". And apparently so does Google Translate.

Except that the definition of "ostensiblement" is "Not hidden, done with the intention to be seen". Which is not at all the English meaning. So now I wonder what's an accurate English translation for "ostensiblement"...

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

"Not hidden, done with the intention to be seen". Which is not at all the English meaning.

It sort of fits the English definition, because it's often used in the context of deception: a person could ostensibly think one thing but actually believe another. The thing they ostensibly think is the thing they intend to be seen, while their true feelings remain hidden.

[–] StinkyDave@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago
[–] cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 years ago
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Purportedly!

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] mpa92643@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

"Allegably"

[–] KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

If you know what they mean, who cares? Does it give you an erection to "correct" people when literally everyone knows what the person means? You're not winning any brownie points being a wannabe middle school English teacher. You're just an insufferable twat.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

El Guapo, I know that I, Jefe, do not have your superior intellect and education, but could it be that once again, you are angry at something else, and are looking to take it out on me?

-- Jefe, ¡Three Amigos!

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When you keep speaking wrong*, it indicates that you have no regard for being understood, and hence you don't give a rat's ass about a) your listeners and b) your language. Meaning you're an insufferable twat.

[–] KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

A total of zero people are confused when someone says "supposably" instead of "supposedly." All you think about is how you or someone else you know was corrected and made fun for speaking "wrong."

Also, "correcting" peoples pronunciations has a deep-rooted history in oppressing minority groups, e.g. "ask" vs. "axe." You'd know this if you weren't full of so much hate and ignorance.

[–] D_C@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Them- "btw, you've pronounced that word incorrectly."
You- "THAT'S RACIST. You are full of hate and ignorance!"

[–] KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You're not an English teacher, right? You're not speaking to your kids, right? You're just having regular conversations with people, right? If you want to beat rules into people who don't speak like you do, you might actually be full of hate and ignorance and you're probably racist, that is 100% correct.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Genuine question: why do people care? The goal of language is to communicate and if you understand what the other person said then they've done that

[–] AffineConnection@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Wye due pupil cairn what wards ah yews wren the pronoun serration is clothes and off two yonder sandwich wards amen two yews wrens pea king allowed.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Thank you for providing evidence in my favor by communicating an idea with words near the edge of incoherence. Obviously there's a spectrum here between near misses and totally breakdown of language. But this is Lemmy so let's jump the gun and not give people the consideration we would if we spoke to them to their face. I'm talking about how all the examples people have been providing are near misses that are very clearly communicating the same thing as a "correct" word. People aren't stupid for using them, you're an asshole for being irritated by it

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Because "supposably" is not a goddamn word, so it shouldn't be used to communicate. We live in a society

[–] Ryumast3r@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You know what also wasn't a word?

Literally every word that is now a word.

[–] 15liam20@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[–] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

We live in a society smh my head every time

[–] nevial@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

It is, though?

[–] nevial@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

Genuine answer: because it makes language less accurate and if you have to infer what the other person is trying to say (instead of what they are actually saying) that is just unnecessary energy wasted and it WILL create misunderstandings eventually. Disclaimer: I know this is about accurately using language, but as English is not my first language, this comment might not be entirely accurate itself, lol. But I am observing similar situations like the one this post is about in my first language (German) as well