417

Starbucks violated federal labor law when it increased wages and offered new perks and benefits only to non-union employees, a National Labor Relations Board judge found Thursday.

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] blueeggsandyam@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

It is funny that by trying to punish the union members, they proved that unions work. The other employees would never have gotten pay raised and perks without the union.

[-] Mrgruesomel@lemmy.zip 45 points 1 year ago

So the person who made the decision goes to jail, right? Right?

Lol, no. They get a fine that's 1% of the profits they made breaking the law.

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

1%?! Whhhoaaa there, we don't want to cause any economical damage that might cause job loss, do we? Do you want to be the one to break it to the deputy minister of job security? Let's go for a more reasonable 0.001%

[-] xTechDeath@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

Starbuck’s little clean progressive image has been totally ruined for me by the way they fight so hard against these unions. I won’t support them in any way

[-] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah. I keep seeing this and thinking,

"That's a bold play for a luxury brand whose leading competition comes in affordable bulk tins for home use."

Here's my soap box:

I expect the gasoline industry to act like assholes all the way to their solar-powered graves.

But seeing overpriced coffee try it boggles my mind.

The CEOs of Starbucks, movies, streaming television and music production have clearly alienated that one friend they could trust to tell them they're being idiots.

In case any of the CEOs are reading along, I'm going to be that final friend to you now:

"The demand in your industry is something called highly elastic. That means that people given any motivation whatsoever to boycott your product will take decades, at minimum, to return to using it, if they ever do. It's easier and more economical to just pay your workers a fair living wage. If you honestly can't afford to pay a fair living wage, that is okay, you may stop now, no one actually needs your product."

And for any really dumb CEOs reading along: "Home coffee grinders are pretty great."

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

People don't go to Starbucks for coffee. People go to Starbucks for their stupidly complicated coffee flavored morning milkshake. Those are hard to replace at home.

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Mmm.. 'beetus

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Any chance a judge can force Starbucks to negotiate with the union in good faith sometime before the heat death of the universe? Maybe? Please!

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
417 points (99.5% liked)

Work Reform

9857 readers
2 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS