this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
825 points (97.5% liked)

Cyberstuck

98 readers
302 users here now

A place to post your Cybertruck fails!

No doxxing and all the basic rules of a sub

founded 2 days ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zink@programming.dev 7 points 3 hours ago

People are pathetic.

Absolutely! I mean look at that sad sack of shit on the sticker in the photo!

[–] Adrius@ttrpg.network 5 points 3 hours ago

It's funny either way

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Yes and I hope the owner does bother to remove the sticker.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Not as political, but how about something like these?

[–] NoxAstrum@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Technically, yes.

In my mind, whether or not this person deserves it depends on when they bought the truck. If they ordered it long before Elmo began showing us how insane he really was, then they're just a bit of a douche. If they bought it since the salute, they deserve more than a sticker.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

by the time the cybertruck was announced he was very publicly insane already.

also regardless of musk, this is a death trap that shouldn't be (and in normal countries isn't) allowed on the road at all. Just because the US law allows billionaires to kill children doesn't mean we should as well. a sticker is getting off easy.

no excuse for owning a cybertruck.

[–] ecvanalog@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No, it’s a fucking sticker. Grow up.

[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

slaps ‘Biden did this’ sticker on top of it

[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That's entering sticker-bombing territory, which might be terrorism, it's got "bombing" in the name.

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

From what I remember, putting this on a painted surface is vandalism because it can ruin the paint topcoat. Putting it on glass is NOT vandalism because it can be removed without damage.

I'm not sure about stainless steel, because I thought the whole point was that it could be cleaned, so I guess it depends on if they want to admit it's a bad finishing material or not.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee -2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I hadn't realised before that it's an anagram of "ELON MUSK TESLA".

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

You're only missing two I's, three C's, one Z, one K and have two L's, two E's, one T, one M, and one S left over.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Legality and morality are distinctly independent concepts.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Should laws follow morality?

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

Ideally, yes.

In capitalism…not even in the same universe

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Morality is subjective. But it's an interesting question. It sounds like the obvious answer should be yes, but who decides what is moral?

Even if we go by what the majority thinks, does that automatically make it moral? There was a time when the moral thing was to burn witches at the stake. We'd call that immoral today.

This feels like a can of worms.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 15 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Maybe it's a factory optional extra someone chose.

[–] Emmie@lemm.ee 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is morally okay and ethical thing to do.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

Well, you do have the consider the owner's safety; when they peel it off, the whole damn thing might explode into a ball of fire. Still on the whole, this seems morally positive only providing a small dangers to non-tesla cars around it.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 84 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People are getting caught up on semantics vs. ethics in this thread. Is it vandalism? Yes, textbook. Is it okay? Also yes, fuck these people for bankrolling his coup.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (4 children)

So basically... Wrong:Yes, Justified: Also yes

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Something, something, Brian Thompson...

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago

No it's:

Illegal: yes; wrong: no

Just because something is illegal doesn't mean it's wrong, for example feeding people experiencing homelessness in certain counties in the US.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Wrong: Technically yes, Morally no

[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

To be honest, Musk does indeed suck nazi cock.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 8 points 23 hours ago

And to be fair, the tweet is 100% accurate: only pathetic losers buy a Swasticar.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is he really that flexible?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chakh@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Would be vandalism if it wasn't true

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Yeah this person is just labelling things accurately, nothing to see here

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Responsible advertising I'd say

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

People are cool

[–] 5in1k@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

Yes, but vandalism is awesome.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I have a 6 year old Tesla. I wouldn't be mad if that was done to me.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Guerrilla brand reinforcement.

load more comments
view more: next ›