this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
217 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19978 readers
4352 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 57 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Get fucked! This is what you voted for! Screw the libs who have been paying your fucking utility bills.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 37 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

I saw a MAGoo post that he knew that Trump's polices would hurt him personally, and he voted for them anyway. Somehow, he managed to convince himself that America had to suffer to be great again.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I mean its not a completely absurd concept that you sometimes need to deal with short term hardships to achieve longterm greatness. Its just that in this case, the hardships dont actually help at all and are purely negative with little to no positives short or longterm.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

So when Hitler came to power, even the communists had this idea that, “Oh let him come to power – he’ll be exposed as being totally inefficient and will fall from power and we’ll have the communist revolution”.

https://www.historyhit.com/why-was-hitler-able-to-dismantle-the-german-constitution-so-easily/

I'm sure people will catch on this time! Not that they did during his first term, but surely they will catch on this time!

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I gave money to Bernie in 2016, 2020, and 2024. every time people told me that there'd be a giant wave of progressives who'd push him over the top.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They were being optimistic and it didn't pan out.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Go back and look up Jerry Falwell. He was a Right Wing Christian who organized a "Moral Majority."

His people grabbed the GOP by doing grassroots politics. If the local Republican organization had had twenty people at the meeting that picked the last candidate for county clerk, the MM's would show up with fifty people. They grabbed up a lot of 'unimportant' positions and were soon able to get their candidates for higher offices nominated.

imho most people on the Left are unwilling to do that kind of low level day-to-day organizing.

They forget that MLK didn't just lead marches, he got voters registered too.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

That is correct, the people supporting Bernie were optimistic it would just pan out and didn't put in the effort needed to get the movement going. Obama's campaign did put in the work with a positive progressive message (hope and change) and that worked out pretty well.

Unfortunately nothing was learned from that success and the Dems went right back to trying to appeal to moderates instead of embracing Bernie or another progressive.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 18 hours ago

The way I look at it is that there was a fire in 2024. The firemen were old and fat and not doing a very good job. Instead of jumping in and actually helping the firemen, a lot of folks thought they were helping by calling the firemen bad at their job.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Yea I don’t know what it was like in the early ‘30s but, today, if someone couldn’t already see how awful the right is for the world then this administration really isn’t going to change any of that person’s worthless views.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 18 hours ago

Almost nobody had any hardships because of the New Deal. The few people who did were landowners whose property was flooded by the TVA.

Mel Gibson tweeted something about 'daddy's home and he's got the belt out.' It's not about the progress, it's about the punishment.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I read that one too. Some thing about how in the long term after Trump is no longer president how America will be better off. Fucking douche canoe also forgot that America doesn’t actually manufacture anything so there’s no industry to protect with high tariffs.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The only thing we can do now is try to get the 90 million people who didn't vote on our side.

The MAGoos are a lost cause.

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Just 5% of those 90 million would do it, actually. Or put another way, the margin of people who turned up to vote for Biden but didn’t turn up for Harris, sadly.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 18 hours ago

Don't get me started on that crowd.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Is that the one who said he may lose his job, but he'd be ok because he had worked to make himself employable unlike all those other people who may lose their jobs?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

That's the one I saw. Fucking 🤡

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 13 hours ago

Jesus. Basically 2:1...

[–] the_fuzz@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Except that this will disproportionately impact low-income communities of color that vote predominantly blue.

[–] 13roses@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

The ones who bother to vote, that is

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 1 points 13 hours ago

Unfortunately that is true and part of the reason they are doing it. Their own people are just collateral. They don’t care and this isn’t the first time this has happened.

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I feel bad for anyone in Alabama who actually voted Blue. Same as Trxas, its deep red- but I have a huge number of friends who had to relocate to Houston because our company moved their headquarters there and now they’re stuck in this little island of liberal surrounded by gun toting Republicans…

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Oh, I get it. I even feel compassion for some of them, even though they don’t have the education, vocabulary or sense to put it into words.

The problem is that most Americans, whether they live in a red state blue state, are unhappy with the way things that have been proceeding for the last 30 - 40+ years. Their way of life has changed. They’ve watched businesses and wealthy and enrich themselves on their hard work and they’re angry that they don’t have a piece of that pie anymore.

They happen to be mad because for the last, I don’t know how many decades politicians, the media, and every preacher trying to convinced them that it’s black people, or immigrants, or liberals, or Democrats, pick a flavor something to hate.

So now they are cheering for the dismantlement of the government and the society that left them behind. They are mad at the wrong people for the wrong things.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They’ve watched businesses and wealthy and enrich themselves on their hard work and they’re angry that they don’t have a piece of that pie anymore.

So now they are cheering for the dismantlement of the government and the society that left them behind.

It is being dismantled by the same wealthy shits. These people are fucking morons.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

President Lyndon B. Johnson once said, "If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.“

Yeah, they’re too dumb to notice they’re being conned. I grew up in New York, so I know all about Donald Trump and all his slimeball bullshit And I still find it hard to believe why a bunch of rural farmers and rust belt laborers Believe in a sleazy racist multiple failure of a fake businessman that is Donald Trump.

He could literally care less about some country yokel while he pretends to be an elite New Yorker. Blows my mind that he is the person that all these idiots decided is their champion. How the fuck did Donald Trump convinced the bottom third of the voting public That he was going to fix everything for them?

And it’s fun to watch them all start to get fucked in the ass by Trump for the second time while they’re cheering about it, Unfortunately it is the demise of the country.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Yeah, they’re too dumb to notice they’re being conned. I grew up in New York, so I know all about Donald Trump and all his slimeball bullshit And I still find it hard to believe why a bunch of rural farmers and rust belt laborers Believe in a sleazy racist multiple failure of a fake businessman that is Donald Trump.

I grew up on Kansas in the 80s/90s and knew that he was a slime ball piece of shit. Was completely blindsided when the morons around me praised him for caring about them while also vilifying liberals for being wealthy city folk. It was the most blatant display of cognitive dissonance I've ever seen.

Then the news saying he appealed to the rural voters by listening to their concerns was fucking wild, since liberals had been doing the exact same thing for decades!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

I remember Chomksy commenting on the "Angry White Man" phenomenon being talked about in the 90s. He said they have a right to be mad (about the financial things), but they have it all wrong about what caused them to be mad...as relevant today as ever.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 31 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

He's taking back $100 each from 2000 households. That's $2 million dollars. They are supposedly trying to cut $2 trillion dollars in government spending. That's 0.0001% of their goal. If you were trying to cut $1000 from your yearly budget, this would be 1/1000th of a cent or roughly the value of pocket lint.

Clearly, the cruelty is the point because there is no other tangible result from this.

P.S. I'm still working on my first cup of coffee so don't be too hard on me if my math is wrong. I still stand by my assessment that the cruelty is the point.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 15 points 18 hours ago

Every cent not spent on helping poors goes into billionaires' pockets. No amount is too small for their unrelenting greed.

[–] bananaslug4@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 17 hours ago

The point you make is important and valid, but I would like to correct the specific numbers for the audience watching from home. 100*2000 is 200 thousand, not two million, which comes to 1/10 millionth of the goal, or 0.00001%. Using the $1000 budget metaphor, that would make 1/10000 of a dollar or 1/100 of a cent.

Don't feel bad about missing a zero here or there, especially early in the day <3

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, $2 million is nothing to the federal government. This is 100% about cruelty.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Wait, isn't Alabama a red state?

"He's not hurting the people he needs to be hurting"

[–] Thunderbird4@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

“Low income Alabama residents” is the key phrase. Considering the demographics of Alabama, the majority of people helped by this program were probably Black.

[–] Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I'd venture a guess that there are an equal number of poor white people in Alabama. Truth be told, Alabama is a festering shithole of a state, and the only reason you don't hear more about how bad it is, is because they got Mississippi right there making them look good by comparison.

Thank God for Mississippi.

[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

They wanted him to hurt anyone that isn't one of them. Instead he hurts anyone that isn't him.

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 6 points 19 hours ago

They just keep eating and eating.

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

64.8% of you Alabamans want this.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

While I doubt it would have effected the end result, a significant part of that gap is due to voter suppression.