this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
78 points (94.3% liked)

News

35821 readers
2012 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For those people wishing for "giant meteor" in the last US election, your desired meteor has finally arrived. The 40x90 meter fast moving meteor currently has a 2.2% likelihood of hitting earth. The effects of its impact would be severe but regional. For scale, the 30x98 meter meteor that hit the Podkamennaya Tunguska River Siberian forest in 1908 impacted 2150 sq meters (830 square miles).

Due to its lateness, smaller than needed size, lack of probable impact, and likeliness to actual deliver zero results, the meteor has been named "Centris" by observers.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Don't get peoples hopes up like that, gosh.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Too small, too unlikely. Proof that there is no god.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 year ago

never do we get anything nice

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To me, a 1 in 44 chance of hitting the Earth is not that unlikely.

I wouldn't board an aircraft if it had a 1 in 44 chance of crashing. (and with this administration, it's getting closer to those odds.)

But yeah, they'll get more data on the asteroid as time goes on and the risk will likely get lowered.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Either 100% chance and the size of Mars or there is no god.

[–] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The second angel blew his trumpet, and something like a great mountain, burning with fire, was thrown into the sea, and a third of the sea became blood.

[–] Palerider@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wormwood...

Revelations 8:11-13

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

Can we start a GoFundMe to send a rocket to push it closer?

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Scott Manley put out a decent video on it this morning:

https://youtu.be/Esk1hg2knno

TLDR/W: It's moving around 13km/s, expected to pass nearby in 2028, and potentially collide with earth in 2032. Currently there's a 2.3% chance of that happening, though as more data is collected that number is expected to drop.

Volume and mass information is scarce as we discovered it too late for radar and are relying on optical observations. Current estimates put it between 40 and 90 meters across and anywhere from 25k tons up to as much as 1 million tons. If that was to hit earth; energy wise, that's equivalent to between 1 and 40 megatons of tnt. For reference, the bomb dropped on Hiroshima (Little Boy) was less than 1/66th of that power (the lower 1megaton number...).

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

FWIW we've dropped worse on our planet. Tsar Bomba was rated to be 50-58 megatons.

[–] Nutteman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Most of those were airbursts

Finally some real solutions to America's problems.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 14 points 1 year ago

Finally, some good news!

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn, don't want to wait for 2032.

[–] Palerider@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but like it's at the end of 2032... so almost 8 years.

I wonder if we'll get Red Dead Redemption 3 by then.