this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
376 points (98.7% liked)

memes

11385 readers
2674 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago

What a silly billy

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

Maybe they'll wanted to see if Tesla will sue him for selling it, lol

[–] krowbear@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I saw a car carrier hauling several cybertrucks at once. Would not want to be driving multiple of them in this politcal climate!

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 hours ago

The trucker probably didn't get to choose their load.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 21 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Not permitted in other countries for a whole list of safety issues. Only good in a zombie Apocalypse, or to drive into crowds with the intention to murder as many people as possible.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 20 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

good in a zombie Apocalypse

...as a makeshift barricade when it inevitably runs out of juice. Perhaps as an explosive trap. You could strip it for parts and resources. But for transportation? Fuck no. A vehicle is only as reliable as its source of fuel. Keeping the electric grid alive would be impossible in a fallen society.

If you want reliable mobility in a zombie apocalypse, get on a bike.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 hours ago

"Alright, listen up folks. We've finally managed to wall off the area against creepers, and we finally got the old generator working. However, electricity will still be restricted until further notice, because Jerry needs the full output to recharge his Cybertruck™ to avoid battery damage."

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I'd say with the abundance of solar panels today, charging EV's wouldn't be that problematic. Gasoline would be hard to get. Bio diesel would be a good alternative but im not sure new vehicles would play nice with it so like pre 2000s diesels would be good. Wood gas is an option but again, would it work on modern cars? EV's seem the easiest to fuel to me in a complete apocalypse. Thoughts?

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yeah I was in a scenario some months back where people didn't have access to electricity or gasoline for nearly a week. Some didn't have access to drinking water. It was mildly apocalyptic. I had never seen anything like that and it was a bit stressful having to work but also not knowing if I'd eventually run out of gas before I would have access to it again. Felt like a mini-apocalypse.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Clouds.

Without the power grid to back them up, solar panels are only as reliable as the weather. A week of overcast skies will drain everything you have in your batteries. No output during the night either. There's also the problem of theft, vandalism, natural wear, and the difficulty of finding replacement parts.

If you have solar energy and a way to store it, it should be used for more vital applications, like lights, cooking, and refrigeration.

[–] manny_stillwagon@mander.xyz 2 points 20 minutes ago

And how much gasoline are you refining in your backyard on those cloudy days?

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know a lot about solar panels, but wouldn't they output at least some power with clouds? Like you still get some sunlight through the clouds, wouldn't the panels be able to use it?

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Some, but the output drops significantly. Solar panels like direct sunlight. Even a thin cloud layer can reduce the output just by both blocking and diffusing sunlight.

(The graphs are just for illustration, I have no context for them)

A car-sized EV's convenience is wasteful when energy is scarce and other options are available.

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

Seems like e-bike with foldable solar panels would be the best? Because even when there's no sunlight, you just have a bit heavier bike, but when there is some, you'd go faster.

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 6 points 5 hours ago

Or an ebike and get some foldable solar panels and a second battery.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Somehow, they always manage to have some source of power in those movies.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Zombie flicks are not exactly known for their strict adherence to realism. Residential power would likely be the first to go, if only to reserve generator capacity and fuel for military, medical, and government facilities, and rich assholes' mansions.

Maintaining the electric grid takes an incredible amount of work and the tight cooperation of all of its facilities. If one or several large generator were to shut down, it might cause a cascading collapse. Executing a black start is a massive challenge at the best of times, and probably impossible in a post-collapse society.

[–] RQG@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

To be fair apocalyptic scenarios become more realistic each day. Still wouldn't want to rely on that thing though.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 7 hours ago

An electric vehicle capable of both highway and off road travel would be a solid choice during the apocalypse, if it was reliable.

F150 lightning it is.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Could explain his recent actions; trying to juice those cybertruck sales…

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It's such a dogshit looking block. Not even a cool looking block.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Honestly I could say that about a large portion of all card, but people buy them. That is really not a good argument against them. Better focus on all the actual shit instead, like... how they can't do what the vehicle type is supposed to be for.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

I dunno man, most modern cars are either slightly cool blocks or at least dogshit in a utilitarian way. Hatchbacks excepted.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 2 points 6 hours ago

It is supposed to generate money for Muskler. It did that, even if that stagnates now. So not a total failure.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Some blocks are good blocks. I assume.