this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
181 points (98.9% liked)

politics

24939 readers
2603 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] forty2@lemmy.world 78 points 5 months ago (3 children)

If I was a Five Eyes nation, I'd be looking long and hard at reducing head count...or at least changing the name to "Four Eyes and an Asshole"

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 40 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] astrsk@fedia.io 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] forty2@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Hahahaha Lock it in and hit up suno.ai

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

at least they better be holding-back the intel they do have and are gathering on americans for the TLAs

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 75 points 5 months ago (1 children)

His aide, according to the WSJ, said Trump's CIA will have a greater focus on the Western Hemisphere, targeting countries not traditionally considered adversaries of the United States.

literally making our closest neighbors into enemies so he can be buddies with Putin and Kim

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I feel like Putin, Xi, and Dumbold divided up the globe and they’ll all focus on taking as much as possible in their sections

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 48 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

Of all the agencies that I thought would capitulate quickly, I’ve got to admit I’m a bit shocked by this one.

At the same time, I’m sure this is not the whole story.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

the TLAs are the feds standing in the emperor's and lord diaper's way the most. justice is locked-down, as is enough of the courts; half of congress is in a daze and the moron majority is eating the orange poo; but the TLAs have off-the-book ops and funding to do 'things'.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, they killed Kennedy over a lot less, and this time they're all at risk of losing their jobs and they're just going to shrug it off?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Kennedy fired the architect of the CIA and planned to significantly cut their budget. What has Trump done that antagonizes them at anything close to that level?

Y'all just think because you personally don't like Trump, the CIA must not like him either. But the CIA does not share your interests or values, in fact, they're pretty much completely opposite.

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 months ago

They used up all their energy and resources on the 500 times they tried to murk Castro, they got no juice left.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well it is the CIA, it is plausible they're just playing the game to stay on Trump's good side. Maybe they 'buyout' a Joe and 'rehire' a Joey that just so happens to know everything Joe did, but 'adores' Trump for reasons

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

My first thought was: everyone in the CIA “retires” and gets “consulting” gigs with shell companies nobody has heard of.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah, but who are those shell companies working for? A big selling point in the general buyouts is, "we want people out of govt service and in the private sector where they can do thier best work!"

I'm thinking we don't want a bunch of freelance spies contracting to the highest bidder

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I think the joke was the shell companies are all owned by the CIA. Hence the quotes around "retires" and "consulting".

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 months ago

The CIA will just become even sketchier.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

People seem to not understand that there will be no rebuilding of these decimated institutions. If there are, they will be manned by a skeleton crew of trump loyalists. They don't care about lost institutional knowledge, or scaling back to current size, they care about capitulating to foreign actors that want to see US influence disappear from the world stage, and rehiring anyone doesn't help them accomplish that.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think you may have missed my point?

I’m pretty sure the CIA is already a few steps ahead of Trump on this one, unlike many of the other Federal institutions who never saw it coming.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not sure what I missed.

I think people overestimate the CIA and their capabilities both individually and as an institution. There's a lot of rank and file there. It's not like 90% of the workforce are covert agents or anything.

What do you expect them to do? If you believe that they're going to get rehired as consultants, who's gonna hire them, and what for? Their names are in a list somewhere as having already worked for the CIA and they likely don't have a personal in with the necessary people (like Elon Musk). Do you expect them to use their covert identities? How many people do you think have those? How many of those identities would have relevant experience? Who is going to support those identities, now that the office providing them with believable history and financial details is no longer running? What kind of action do you think they're gonna take? If not any against the government, then they're just going to capitulate to doing their job for fascists. If against the government, why did they wait till it got so bad already? I legitimately don't understand what you think is going to happen.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

OK, not only are you completely correct, but the latest TechDirt article shows that the CIA has just blown the identity of all new hires to comply with an executive order.

So long-time staffers might be doing CYA, but the org as a whole is already seriously compromised.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think it's not that far fetched to presume the CIA has major political power within the US, more than the EPA at least. If someone, they know how to assassinate a president or a billionaire and make it look like an accident.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Sure, but why would they want to do anything about Trump?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He's eroding the US' capability to coup and extract wealth from other countries. Trump is squandering all the power they built up on posturing and bullshit.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml -4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Reducing CIA headcount for example. But also, fracturing US alliances, stopping USAID, removing the US from international agreements that it could use as diplomatic soft power leverage, and just being a general jackass.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml -3 points 5 months ago

Reducing CIA headcount

So the reason they wouldn't take buyouts is because they were offered?

But also, fracturing US alliances, stopping USAID, removing the US from international agreements that it could use as diplomatic soft power leverage, and just being a general jackass.

"General jackassery" is not going to cause the CIA to assassinate a president. The CIA are generally jackasses lol. Fracturing alliances, I'm not sure that the CIA cares and I'm not sure how much of an effect his shenanigans will actually have in the long term. Some members of the CIA might prefer if he didn't withdraw from international agreements, but in the grand scheme of things, I imagine it's pretty small potatoes to them. The CIA certainly has the power to slap a president that gets out of line, but it's not as if they micromanage every decision. Is any of that really enough to make it "shocking" that they're cooperating?

If Trump's really kneecapping the CIA that badly, I guess it's the one good thing he's done. More realistically, I assume he's greenlighting them on all sorts of horrible shit behind closed doors and couldn't be happier with him.

[–] ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works 48 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The party of law and order is officially defunding the police. Great job!

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 16 points 5 months ago

They kinda do like to play world secret police though.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 5 months ago

They're bacon nonetheless

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 months ago

then, replenish the workforce with putin puppets and kgb assets.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The last president to do a mass firing at the CIA was Carter. Hopefully this turns out just as well for Trump.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I sincerely hope Trump doesn't make it to 100 years old.

[–] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I agree, unless he ends up in jail, then I hope he grows very old.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Well, there goes one of my remedies. Will the military capitulate next?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago

I for one am shocked that the CIA is not standing up for the democratic values it's so well known for upholding.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

They view the civilian goverment as above them at all times through all means, it's very serious military doctorine to always be guided by the civilian goverment. How that plays out with a fascist in charge who wants to violate the constitution, who is clearly using legalism to order blatantly illegal actions already, it's not clear. But in my opinion the leadership of the military will hold their nose and do whatever they are told and the enlisted will largely enjoy that.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They're fascists, they bend the knee. That's how it works out.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If your neighbors are CIA it might be time to dox them

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

The only guy I know in the CIA was trying to pick up my friend in a bar!

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

First thing trump did I've agreed with. Do the NSA next.