this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
291 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19620 readers
5232 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 84 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The White House defended the firing of Fong and the other inspectors general, saying "these rogue, partisan bureaucrats... have been relieved of their duties in order to make room for qualified individuals who will uphold the rule of law and protect Democracy."

The doublespeak is rampant

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 41 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They fucking talk like cartoon villains. All the verbiage in his executive orders is like this too. How did they ever get any traction? I hate this country.

Rogue partisan bureaucrat who has been doing her job for 20+ years. Not the rogue partisan administration that has been in office for a week and is trying to set everything on fire without any oversight from these 20 year professionals.

[–] TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

And it's this kind of cartoonish language that speaks to their base

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How did they ever get any traction

First Past The Post voting has limited the competition in our elections, making both mainstream political parties incredibly soft and filled with weak individuals. This is why the republicans were so easily bought by Russia, and why the democrats couldn't find a way to beat a circus full of clowns.

States control how they vote. We don't need a miracle from congress, we can change how we vote and open our elections to 3rd parties with no chance for a spoiler effect. Some states have already made this much needed reform.

Alaska recently had a referendum to see if they wanted to switch back to FPTP from Ranked Choice voting and it didn't pass. Republicans were bitter that Sarah Palin lost to a more moderate conservative because of Ranked Choice voting, and tried to get rid of it. The people of Alaska have spoken. They want nothing to do with First Past The Post voting.

Republicans controlled states are passing laws to protect FPTP voting. Why are blue states using the voting system republicans prefer? Why are democrats saying no to these easy extra votes from increased voter turnout?

Believe in democracy, work to replace FPTP voting in your state today!

Videos on Electoral Reform

First Past The Post voting (What most states use now)

Videos on alternative electoral systems we can try out.

STAR voting

Alternative vote

Ranked Choice voting

Range Voting

Single Transferable Vote

Mixed Member Proportional representation

Maybe not the best reason but I don't see how this didn't contribute to the problem. If you're not full on MAGA you're basically labeled a leftist. If you're not progressive you're a Nazi enabler. We're all more complex than that but we get boiled down to "what our party believes in". Even though some parties are fake opposition it's more expensive and inefficient to fund multiple parties and party leaders and keep up the facade of independence. It's not a cure but it insulates our system slightly from centralized corruption.

Getting money out of politics (or at least campaigns) altogether would be the biggest positive change we could make.

[–] nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

My machinations laid undetected for years...

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

If you don't support this you officially don't support Democracy©®.

/s

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We will give you democracy by using authoritarian methods.

The US has been doing this to the world for a hundred years .... why is everyone surprised that it's happening in America now

[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 30 points 1 day ago

Good. Don't do the fascists' job for them. Be like Phyllis Fong and the others in the government who are resisting this. Every second they are forced to force people out and defend their policies and actions is a second they aren't acting against vulnerable people.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The firing is illegal so they don't have authority to do that

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who is going to stop them?

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Maybe a huge lawsuit where the instigators have to pay a settlement out of pocket?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Security agents” appears to translate as Gestapo.

On who’s order though appears to be Musk, Don, and America.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Great. Wonder when our gestapo get their patriotic sounding Special State Police name.

E: freedom police or some such lame shit.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Gonna have an X in it.

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Article says “security agents” which for a federal building are probably DHS agents or private contractors.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 25 points 1 day ago

probably DHS agents

Which just so happens to be run by the puppy killer right? They know who they chose and why. :/

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Glad to see that some people are choosing to have a spine and not surrender in advance. She is braver than most

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

De-wormer Manufacturers 'bout to make a killin'.

[–] scaryjelly@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

I don't have many of those left, but here we go: What the fuck.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Good for her. I much rather eat nothing for a few days than get some pandemic disease that will kill me painfully.