209

Rep. Dean Phillips (D-Minn.) is calling on Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) to resign in the face of corruption charges, his office confirmed to The Hill. Phillips, a member of the bipartisan Problem Sol…

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kata1yst@kbin.social 76 points 1 year ago

Dean Phillips is a real one. He represented me while I lived in his area. I emailed him a couple of times to insist on the right to repair, find solutions to police brutality, protect Internet freedom, and various privacy votes.

Each time he personally called me. He himself. We'd have a conversation. And then when new votes came up around the same topics, he'd call me back to discuss. Once a year he'd call to get my opinion on how things were going in general and what I was concerned about. He also holds regular virtual town halls.

I should stress I'm nobody important, and he does this with anyone who engaged with his office.

If all reps were like him, our country would be much better off.

[-] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 year ago

Amazing. I had to email my representative for a class, I sent him a letter backing a specific medical rights bill that was working through the legislature. The response from someone in his office. ‘We have noted your support for this bill, thank you’ .

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah most of them seem to have these vague responses that feel cooperate or just ... artificial. They use a lot of words to say, very little.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

The one or two times my gf wrote a congressperson she got back a really long, generic letter that basically explained why they were voting the opposite way regardless, with phrases like “I understand your concern”.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 32 points 1 year ago

There is zero downside for Democrats to insist Menendez to go, or force him to resign. If he refuses, defeat him in the primary. He should not be on the ballot in Nov 2024.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 7 points 1 year ago

Uh... there's the Senate majority getting further thinned. Pretty sure this would result in a two party tie if he resigned at least until he could be replaced ... and that's assuming he's replaced with a Democrat.

That in turn means all kinds of potentially compromised confirmations.

[-] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

It's sad that this is even a consideration. We shouldn't have to keep corrupt pigs in office because of who's team their on.

On the other hand, the "other team" tends to be full of corrupt pigs and it's arguably legitimately dangerous for the entire country.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It’s disappointing that to avoid giving republicans more power, democrats might have to tolerate having someone corrupt stay in office. We know that the Rs would never get rid of someone who might be replaced by a democrat as power is their #1 objective. Clarence Thomas, for instance.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

Dems would still maintain their majority. To me it is worth it to take out the trash. But if you want to get realpolitik then I think it’s still worthwhile to not tolerate a prominent corrupt politician in your ranks. That could have electoral consequences for the party as a whole.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure, ideally they'd boot him out. Someone taking overt bribes doesn't belong in congress (the dumb thing is, there are so many ways to take non-overt bribes, which 95% of them do - have a family member hired by a lobbyist or foundation, for instance). It's just unfortunate that Republicans get an advantage since they'd never boot one of their own who was found guilty of corruption. They'd just ignore it or deny it, and their voters would either deny it or just not care also.

[-] cbarrick@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It depends on how New Jersey replaces senators.

In a lot of states, the Governor can appoint a replacement. In NJ, that would still be a democrat.

I dunno how NJ does it though.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Per the article, that’s two so far (only one from NJ), plus the governor of NJ.

I was shocked when he got re-elected after the last charges, but these are far more serious allegations. Time for him to go

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

He can be trump’s celly.

If so-called moderate Republicans had a shred of integrity, this would have happened long ago with Bobert and MTG.

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
209 points (97.3% liked)

News

23301 readers
1034 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS