141
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 34 points 1 week ago

The worst part about this is that it will take 20 years for the damages of this to become really apparent, and the dumb fucks who voted for trump will just blame whoever is currently in charge. Or claim that Democrats have some kind of disease gun.

[-] graycube@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

I think it will have impact a lot sooner than 20 years. As soon as no one can trace the next listeria or salmonella outbreak, or evenrecognize there is a flu epidemic happening, or whatever. There will be kids dieing from bad ice cream before summer is over.

[-] Blum0108@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago
[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago
[-] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

But fried ice cream is so good

[-] graycube@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Of course, if you don't collect any data on it so no one will know. Problem solved.

[-] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

What a time to be immunocompromised.

[-] MeatPilot@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago
[-] Somsphet@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago
[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Yikes. Awful decision here.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 100 points 1 week ago

Are ya'll ready for how fucked we are? None of this shit is getting fixed, considering we're still living with Reagan's damages.

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

Maybe I’m naïve, but I’m hoping their overreach is so bad that the pendulum aggressively swings back in the other direction.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I think you underestimate the rippling damage of four years with Trump loyalists running the HHS, FDA, CDC, EPA, DoE, CIA, FBI, etc. can do to the world.

That’s on top of the damage from rapidly repealing regulations by the President.

Even if we replace the whole government with progressives, it’ll take decades to fix, assuming we survive that long.

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Eventually. It will. How long? That's impossible to say. As is how bad it will get before a correction occurs. Hitler was in power for twelve years. 70-85 million people died during his reign between slaughters and fighting. And Germany was not the strongest nation in the world (and definitely not the strongest by a wide margin) at that time. Imagine Germany starting off 1933 with the military might to fight two wars at once with the two strongest nations on the planet. And imagine their border was basically impenetrable by any combined force of countries while they fought those two wars. That could easily be where we're going to be at. No one is coming to save us.

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Tariffs alone will probably lead to a very bleak outlook for Republicans in the midterm elections.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Maybe the opposite. Biden’s policies turned the economy around. All the numbers look good and were poised for growth that Trump will take credit for

How quickly and widely will he actually apply tariffs? If they don’t take widespread effect for two years, they’re home free

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

That'd be nice and I'm sure sentiment will swing but I don't think they'd go through all this trouble of remaking the government (and essentially the whole country) just to get "voted out" and have to spend billions more regaining power. It'll be way cheaper just to rig things.

[-] socsa@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

That's kind of why I don't think the RFK stuff is actually going to happen. Trump can sell the economic populism stuff but he lost in 2020 because of anger over public health. Letting RFK be crazy is just going to cause headaches.

[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Trump will just take no responsibility. He'll blame RFK Jr for all the things that go wrong. Maybe he'll eventually get fired but at that point the damage will already be done. Trump will just say "Ah, he screwed me, I would have done the exact same thing but it would have worked, I'm a smart guy, I'll fix it or appoint someone else to fix it." And then it won't be fixed.

So if RFK Jr. is smart he'll just do a little bit of damage over time. Alternatively if there is a ton of chaos on day 1, then just add to the chaos. People can only be angry at so many things at one time.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

What till you see the Liberty Law School zealots who find their way to SCOTUS for lifetime appointments

[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago
[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago

You're just NOW realising this? Most of us came to that conclusion right around 1am on election night, when we realized that Harris had no path to victory without PA.....and then lost PA.

Now to be fair, SOME people took a little longer to realise this......and by that I mean they'd already went to sleep and realised hours later when they woke up.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

They never said they just learned this, you just showed up all rude for fun

[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 6 points 1 week ago
[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I withhold the right to make spelling and grammar mistakes while posting from my treadmill.

[-] StraponStratos@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

. . . to be replaced by bloodsucking leeches no doubt

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

His brain worm is going to feel to betrayed.

[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Neither are going to like the bleach much.

[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

So will insurance companies stop covering vaccines after the federal government no longer supports/requires them? I guess state education departments could still require them.....right?

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

So will insurance companies stop covering vaccines after the federal government no longer supports/requires them?

I'm betting insurance companies will still cover vaccines. If they didn't covered individuals will still get sick and consume even more costly medical, hospital, and surgical services. Getting customer to get vaccines are good business for insurance companies.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

If they didn't covered individuals will still get sick and consume even more costly medical, hospital, and surgical services.

So is covering preventative care like physical therapy after an injury so you can heal correctly and not require further treatments but my insurance gives diddly for PT. They should cover gym memberships and aerobic classes too. If they can deny coverage for smoking them I should get extra benefits if I exercise and eat properly.

We just don't know what is gonna happen next year when the shit hits the country.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Unless regulation is so loose they basically don't have to pay a damn thing even when you get sick.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Unless regulation is so loose they basically don’t have to pay a damn thing even when you get sick.

If it gets that bad, then people will simply drop insurance.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Not unless they keep the regulation that ACA established where you need to be covered at a certain level. That way insurance companies can literally just collect money and not actually have to pay for anything.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago

The kennedy clan are known to be very protective of their reputation, hence being so reluctant to speak out about the insane russian asset in the family.

I'm going to enjoy watching their family name associated with the largest rise in preventable deaths in american history. At least until I contract polio.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Pay attention. They've spoken out a lot.

I really hope someone is keeping a list of all of the saboteur hires, not just the cabinet level posts but stuff like this, in case we have the chance to remove them later.

I know in Mexico and other countries higher on the corruption index, where there are still elections that aren't pre-decided but a lot of additional corruption and arbitrary politicking, this purge-and-replace cycle happens every election. It's so unfortunate but may just be the new way of doing things, even if somehow we retain democratic elections.

[-] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

Vaccinate while you can, this is gonna be a hell of a ride

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Probably a whole lot more than that. This is just the start.

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
141 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19102 readers
3526 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS