60% of Latinos voted for the Democrats, more than the White population, but these people will never blame the whites, it's all always the blacks, natives, latinos and asians that get blamed by both parties for all the problems in the US

Maybe I am out of touch?

No, it’s the non-white voters who are white supremacists

Am I acting paranoid for suspecting that somebody deliberately tampers with these statistics?

I read somewhere that everybody except for white men voted in greater proportions for Trump four years ago than they did eight years ago, and I found that very hard to believe; I never saw anybody explain that, unless maybe the general turnout was smaller.

Neocons need to be sent to hell, the only place they haven't tried to invade yet. (Maybe we can convince them by showing them geologic surveys of the rich sulfur deposits there).

I’m feeling much better now!!!

the only bad part about (at least some of) the Democrats caring about Gaza again is that we all know that it's insincere. they didn't give a shit about hospitals full of people being hit by some of the biggest non-nuclear bombs humanity has yet conceived of under Biden, but now (at least some of them) are going to pretend they care now. and in 4 years if the Dems win then they will return to not giving a shit

I still think that liberals caring about real-world issues under Trump is a positive silver lining, but it comes with that distrust of them, because we've seen how their empathy and morality switches off simply because the president changes. how many will return to brunch when like, Klobuchar or Biden's head in a jar is elected president in 2028? I'm unsure how to radicalize these sorts of people permanently; then again, as Day indirectly says, perhaps the Democrat liberal base is barren ground from the start

The only thing in that list that changes if Kamala won is that Elon would be sad. There's only limited changes to the nature and shape of the evil of this empire between which demon gets elected.

Just a reminder when these people say "Ukraine is fucked", what they mean is they believe Trump will have a less hawkish policy toward Ukraine than Biden. That he'll pump fewer weapons into a barbaric WWI-style meat grinder in eastern Europe and engage in diplomacy. Something that likely isn't even true.

• Gaza if anything has an ever slightly better chance than if the current regime that is currently funding its genocide had won.

• Yeah, Ukraine is fucked, but it was anway and would be no matter who won. Also, this is a good thing.

• No more than they already were.

• No more than they already were.

• No more than they already were.

• The Biden/Harris regime loved doing brinkmanship to bring us closer to WW3 and did so far more than Trump did during his previous presidency. We'll see though.

• The Biden/Harris regime did more deportation than Trump, they built his wall, and they were promising to do even more to ruin lives and families if elected again. It was a competition with Trump on who could be worse and more evil.

• It does suck that Elon Musk is probably happy, I agree.

Generally in Europe they seem to favor business as usual neoliberal fascism

the fuck they are? meloni, macron whatever with lepen, vvd in netherlands, fpo in austria. There is spain/portugal/belgium with dif socdemy neolib vibes, and hangers on in germany and ukkk

I don't have a job after November :(

A majority of them will not only keep their jobs but will work on the Democrat 2028 campaign, if this election is anything to go by. this makes total sense and is very smart if and only if you regard your job as maximizing money extracted from donations, with getting voters as an unimportant afterthought, and this is indeed the current state of the Democratic Party

Changing the pick would be worse than just being wrong a second time.

Now it's 8 of last 11 elections