696
submitted 2 weeks ago by ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Whopraysforthedevil@midwest.social 148 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 81 points 2 weeks ago

Young women are alright, right wing support amongst <35 y.o. men is surprisingly high...

[-] Whopraysforthedevil@midwest.social 72 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. I'm a teacher and see it in my classrooms. I often feel that they're not taught how to have healthy community, so they become lil fascists...

[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 50 points 2 weeks ago

If they're like my nephew, the "manosphere" gives them easy answers as to why everything seems to suck.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

It's also the only answer. Society has really neglected boys for a long time now.

[-] Whopraysforthedevil@midwest.social 34 points 2 weeks ago

Yup. Patriarchy did them dirty. Society told them they had to be strong, stoic, and without emotion. And when that butted up against the realities of being a human we didn't have any community to lead them towards living a good and healthy life.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

You can fault the Right for a lot of things but they got there first on this one. They have a story for why things suck and they’re pounding the drum on it relentlessly. It doesn’t matter that this story is full of holes when the alternative is not compelling.

[-] Whopraysforthedevil@midwest.social 15 points 2 weeks ago

Yup. The propaganda machine moved quick when they realized this population could be manipulated into action outside of message boards.

load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

I have great hope that they'll be better than our generation, just as we were better than our parents. Fuck the 'fuck the kids' mentality.

[-] Whopraysforthedevil@midwest.social 21 points 2 weeks ago

I'm a classroom teacher, and I find that you've gotta sometimes have both "fuck them kids" and "for the kids" in different measures. But overall, I feel like they're doing a lot of cool things.

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 weeks ago

That's a good point. I think that one of the myths that needs to die is that if the cherubic, sweet, innocent, and pure child. Many children, without guidance, are sociopathic assholes. We're not born "good" then corrupted by the world, we're born with some personality traits that may or may not help us as social creatures and need help to learn how to handle our emotions and cooperate with others in a manner that is pro-social.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago

Anything that helps legitimize trump (increase overall pop vote numbers, regardless of loss) or props up green party and stein with a stated intention to get trump elected, in fact "helps trump"

Considering a vote for Dr. Jill Stein? I'm open if you have some insight I'm missing, but in my experience the green party has some exciting ideas on the surface, as lip service, but the party doesn't put in meaningful work in interim government outside of a presidential election cycle every 4 years. So it's a meaningless party.

You may think, "I'm in a solid red or blue state where my vote can't influence at the national level", but I find it hard to support Green/Stein in any capacity with how blatantly Stein has, in my opinion, been knowingly running as a spoiler candidate. The Green party has a (now publicly stated) intention to have Harris lose Michigan specifically. Below is clip from a Stein rally in Dearborn, Michigan. A surrogate for Stein is about to introduce her and spells out their intentions very clearly during remarks,

"We are not in a position to win the White House, but we do have a real opportunity to win something historic... we could deny Kamala Harris the state of Michigan. And the polls show that most likely Harris cannot win the election without Michigan.”

I would ask anyone considering a vote for Stein, in any state, to consider that truth they speak openly - When they are admitting that they can't win, stating a goal to defeat the Harris campaign and acknowledging that Harris likely cannot win the election without Michigan, the undeniable net of that is that they are working to directly secure a second trump presidency, in my opinion.

As I see it, we just cannot have it both ways in a two party system. If the green party was a serious movement working against two party politics (and I would personally embrace and support this) they would become THE platform for ranked choice voting with a green party candidate in every meaningful on/off year election to make that issue ubiquitous with green. They speak endlessly about the flawed two party system (with a clear bias towards shitting in dems), but in the current two party system we actually have, you can't cast a protest vote without actually casting a vote for trump in this election - And that cannot be stated more clearly than this green party spokesperson states it at this event before Stein speaks.

Here is a link to direct feed of that green party rally in Dearborn Michigan if anyone wants to see first hand to consider. It's a longer video, but it starts at the point discussed and surrogate makes the above quoted statement within about the first minute speaking. https://youtu.be/WKSm2FQ8z60?t=5153

And trump acknowledges as much directly mentioning Stein and green party campaign by name recently,

"Cornel West — he’s one of my favorite candidates, Cornel West," Trump said. "And I like — I like her also. Jill Stein. I like her very much. You know why? She takes 100% from [Biden]. [West] takes 100%. Kennedy’s probably 50/50, but he’s a fake.”

https://www.msnbc.com/the-reidout/reidout-blog/trump-speech-jill-stein-cornel-west-rcna158627

I've heard individual positions I like from West, Stein and others in the past, but in my opinion if they aren't fighting to be the bridge to engage the flawed structure of elections in this country as third parties, these are just campaigns driven more by individual candidate ego than a motivation for systemic change.

Those are my thoughts.

load more comments (27 replies)
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago

Shouldn't be hard to convince anyone not to vote for her who doesn't hate minorities.

Just let him know that David Duke endorsed Jill Stein.

If that isn't a literal mic drop on her campaign idk what more can be done. Just make sure everyone knows before they approach a voting booth.

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 16 points 2 weeks ago

She rejected the endorsement. Even if she is throwing the election don’t put that crap on her. She can’t control David Duke

Dick fucking Cheney endorsed Harris and she embraced it. And her poll numbers plummetted. That’s a bigger problem with an actual consequence.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago

Wait til you find out Dick Cheney endorsed Harris! Probably the chief architect of the "GWOT", responsible for over 1 million dead. Fuck David Duke, but he's fuckin small potatoes compared to Dick-Vader.

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 2 weeks ago

I heard a piece on Here And Now today about a group of single issue voters in Dearborn that is actively working to disrupt and damage the Harris campaign. They are trying to get dems to vote for Stein.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Godric@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

G.R.E.E.N

Get

Republicans

Elected

Every

November

[-] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago

The Green Party thanks Lemmy for all the publicity it has given to the Jill Stein campaign

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

How do you do fellow young adults.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
696 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3817 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS