But it's not both. How can you produce something for cheaper with less subsidies unless your just better at it.
It's like saying the winner of a race had an unfair advantage even after giving their opponent a head start.
But it's not both. How can you produce something for cheaper with less subsidies unless your just better at it.
It's like saying the winner of a race had an unfair advantage even after giving their opponent a head start.
Haha the facade liberalism's "law and order" has completely collapsed.
No that's just the US not being competitive because stock buy backs and layoffs are easier than building good cheap cars.
It's not due to a lack of will. They can't produce cars as cheaply because they've spent the last 50 years closing factories and buying back their own stock while China invested in their industrial capacity.
The US subsidizes their EV industry twice as much as China. The real why China can do this is because the US has gutted their industrial base in favor of financialization while China built up their industrial base.
Can you elaborate?
Overturned by the Supreme Court.
Noice, corporations about to have slaves soon.
Ooooo I'm going to get to live in the cyberpunk dystopia that I'm such a fan of after all.
Bruh he sounded ancient. I actually found it challenging to follow what he was saying.
It won't help. The real cause is that public school education is so severely underfunded in the US.