this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
155 points (96.4% liked)

News

36233 readers
4670 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal judge in Missouri put a temporary hold on President Joe Biden’s latest student loan cancellation plan on Thursday, slamming the door on hope it would move forward after another judge allowed a pause to expire.

Just as it briefly appeared the Biden administration would have a window to push its plan forward, U.S. District Judge Matthew Schelp in Missouri granted an injunction blocking any widespread cancellation.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Six Republican-led states requested the injunction hours earlier

republican hate the people

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Easy solution: don't cancel debt for people who live in those states. Say the Republicans blocked it. Move forward with everyone else.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, state rights! They want the states to decide, ok they decided. Now cancel my debt, I don't live in those states.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

They're always for state's rights- until the state decides they have the right to do something conservatives don't like.

Here's a funny thing- I used to regularly have to go to a place back in the 90s where I had to wait for a while and listen to their radio play Limbaugh as part of my job. So one day, this kid calls in. Literally a kid. Like a 15-year-old who called himself conservative.

So this kid says something to Limbaugh like, "what happens if we get what we want and abortion is sent back to the states and states keep it legal?"

Limbaugh hemmed and hawed and eventually said he'd have to think about it and get back to the kid, which I have to assume he never did because the answer is that conservatives only give a shit about state's rights when it benefits them. And look where we are now, with talk of a national abortion ban.

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago

And then encourage people with useful degrees to move to states which will cancel the debt.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

The judicial branch is waging war on the executive branch. Federal student loans are entirely within the jurisdiction of the department of education and the law gives them unambiguous authority of discretion with how the program is run.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I was in the process of applying for the SAVE program when it was blocked. I don't know why or how but this put my payments on hold for another year. Not as good as paying it off, but still a huge help.

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was automatically enrolled in it a while back because I’m on income-based repayments, and they just keep delaying even recertification. I haven’t had to do shit with my account in years. It’s really nice honestly, because I don’t intend to repay it (I’ve never made enough to warrant a payment, under the income based plan.. so fuck ‘em)

I’m super glad you got into the infinite loop of stalling too! :) everyone should apply, when they can!

Basically, if I understand right, they are choosing to do nothing rather than fuck it all up and collect what they shouldn’t, which they would then have to credit.

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My wife was already approved for it. I was supposed to be done in July and now I can't do anything... I wasn't even on the SAVE plan. I was on the preexisting forgiveness program for state employees and teachers. Now they won't touch my account, placed a hold on it so all I can do is make payments. I'm not paying shit until I have a definitive word about when I'm done!

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was approved and was started on the plan then boom.

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's really keeping us in a shitty place. One of the reasons I've stayed with this company so long was being on the forgiveness plan. With that taken care of, I could look into working with a private company and leverage the decade of experience I have into a better salary, but until it's taken care of I can't risk jeopardizing my repayment plan... It's like being held hostage.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I work in higher ed. The hell I’ll ever go into public sector while holding a loan.

[–] ElJefe@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Fucking unbelievable.