119
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by jordanlund@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Final (?) Debate thread before the election in 35 days.

Debate begins at 9 PM Eastern, 6 PM Pacific and runs 90 minutes.

Vice Presidential debates are always tricky since nobody has voted for Vice President in living memory.

Expect Vance to attack Walz on his military service.

Expect Walz to attack Vance on the whole "immigrants eating cats and dogs" thing.

Expect Vance to attack Walz on being an assistant coach, at best.

Expect Walz to roll out "Weird!" at least once.

CBS has announced the burden of fact checking will be on the candidates themselves.

https://apnews.com/article/cbs-debate-vice-president-fact-check-7a3b31c98ab092dd44915df57a359d10

How to watch here:

https://apnews.com/article/cbs-debate-vice-president-fact-check-7a3b31c98ab092dd44915df57a359d10

"How can you watch the VP debate on cable? 

CBS will air debate coverage starting at 8 p.m. ET on CBS broadcast stations and affiliates. Find your local station here.

How can you stream the VP debate without cable? 

The debate can be streamed on the free CBS News app on your connected TV or smartphone, on Paramount+, and all platforms where CBS News 24/7 is available, including CBSNews.com and YouTube. 

Debate coverage on CBS News 24/7 begins at 4 p.m. ET."

Edit Impressive how a debate can go when one participant doesn't have mental health issues! Thanks for coming everybody!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 73 points 1 month ago

Ha, fuck you. My life was destroyed by disability, and the only drug that was helping me went from $250 a month to $3000 a month between 2015 to 2017. Everything got worse, to the point I can’t even afford to live.

This especially pisses me off.

Fuck you Vance and fuck everything you just said. It’s all lies.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 63 points 1 month ago

Walz: "Well I don't run Facebook and Trump lost."

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago

"Under Kamala Harris' leadership."

I wish Walz would say that JOE BIDEN IS THE FUCKING PRESIDENT.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 1 month ago

I will say that I worry about Vance as a candidate when he’s no longer directly tied to Trump and his madness. He’s the face of non-truth leading to fascism.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago

"Did he lose the 2020 election?"

"OH YEAH?!?! Well did Kamala Harris censor people?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 40 points 1 month ago

vance won't answer if trump lost the 2020 election. oh its the lauph into cry now. man he is so weasily.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

"Should we force catholic hospitals to do abortions?"

No. Because there shouldn't be catholic hospitals.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

It's crazy how... like. Normal? This debate is. I mean they obviously disagree on stuff, but there's at least a baseline of respect here so far.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

Its like Trump is the problem lol.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Oh definitely, I just kind of forgot how debates can be when his dumbass isn't in the room.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] KnitWit@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

Vance after the Debate

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

"She hasn't accomplished what she set out to do in three years" is kind of weird for the running mate of the guy who accomplished fuck all in terms of his campaign promises for four.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 month ago

Vance lies like he breathes, but he isn’t mentally addled like Trump. He’s a threat. A long term threat.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

Listening to these idiotic "uncommitted voters" in the focus group are the absolute worse. It's a collection of people that love the attention of being an indecisive moron.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 month ago

Attacking Walz on his military record while Vance had a mostly clerical job, never saw combat, was of a lower rank and was in the military for 4 years compared to 24 years? Bold move...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bcgm3@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

Vance: I did wanna answer your question, because you did ask it...

Narrator: He did not answer her question.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago

To Vance's credit, he's doing a monumental amount of damage control and sanewashing for Donald Trump and is doing a decent job at it. Yes Vance is lying through his teeth with each answer but he is markedly better at keeping his cool compared to the former Narcissist-in-Chief against VP Harris. It's a position Walz wouldn't envy. So overall I think this is within the best range of events Vance could expect.

They both did well at acknowledging each other and keeping this like a somewhat normal debate, can you imagine. That said, if any viewer can hold a thought without focusing solely on whatever deflection each candidate is doing, Walz is giving better answers, and Vance is putting way more false equivalencies in.

Walz is doing very well with his answers, he's not as calculated and rehearsed as Harris, and you know having a heart makes you mess up more than the recently changed telephone options menu, but he is doing a fantastically better job at connecting with voters than Vance did. Walz's jabs are quick and easily missed ("Wharton") but even with apolitical people, if they understand Walz's language then they'll get when he is jabbing at Vance.

Obviously I was hoping Vance would fold up into a chair and was disappointed for that to not happen. More than that though is that I'm crossing my fingers the news cycle doesn't begin pretending it's a normal election cycle just because the VP candidates could actually look each other in the eye for a night. Idk, give it 48hours and Trump will be starved enough of attention to break the spell and make people glare at him again in disgust.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 month ago

Walz drove it home on the threat to democracy, and Vance had nothing to respond.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

Walz should have just called it out right there: your running mate is a reality denying narcissist, and you're his lapdog. You won't say he lost because you're scared daddy will yell at you if you do.

[-] KnitWit@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Vance digging deep into the reddit school of debate. ‘Explain to me how my lie is untrue please. I’ll derail all other talk until then.’

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

It just occurred to be that Vance is running for president not VP. I don't think he thinks Trump will get through his term if elected.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

A little more than an hour in...

Vance has been exactly as polished as expected, other than a slightly rough start coming off as robotic. He's managed a few genuinely human-seeming moments, too, especially upon learning that one of Walz's kids witnessed a shooting. But he's been lying nearly constantly.

Walz isn't as polished, but he's been doing much better in that department than I would have expected, while still coming off as very nice and genuine. He's had a couple of flubs, but none of them were debate killers, while he's gotten in far more actual hits than Vance, by far. Like, it's not even close.

There's another thing: Vance is legitimately boring to listen to. I didn't realize this before, but his voice could be used as a sleep aid.

I'm biased. I'll own that. So take from this what you will: I think Walz is winning. It's close, but I think he's coming off as more honest and more real, while Vance is coming off as dishonest and plastic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

“Why won’t you rebut my lies?”

“They aren’t true”

“Ok but like why won’t you explain how?”

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Vance literally said nothing about Trump's healthcare plan. They still have nothing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“We have well developed views on public policy so we don’t have to prepare that much,” Vance said in a Teamsters press call on Wednesday morning. “We feel a lot more confident and frankly, you don’t have to prepare if you don’t have to hide what you say.”

-Jd "we make stuff up" Vance

😂🤣😂🤣

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Who is banning books right now JD?!?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago

The housing shortage is caused by illegal immigrants and not drilling for oil? I have no words.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

The pregnant pause from the moderator followed by her mystified question made me laugh out loud.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Vance: "Women don't trust us because we are against abortion. We'll make them trust us by making fertility treatments more accessible."

What?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

LOL! "Thank you, senator, for describing the legal process."

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I did it. I opened a private tab and checked Truth Social. Trump is obsessed with Walz misspeaking on school shooters. He also screamed in all caps that he would veto a national abortion ban. Also his usual weird fixation with the moderators’ ratings in other shows, and still asserting that anyone who said he lost in 2020 is lying.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“NRA used to teach gun safety” is a great line for purple states.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

lol Vance did not want to answer that elector question.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Vance: "The white guys shooting up schools with legally purchased guns are the fault of immigrants."

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

"from AOC to Dick Cheney to Taylor Swift."

Taylor Swift confirmed more right-wing than Cheney!1!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 18 points 1 month ago

I'll be asleep which I suppose I should be thankful for (I've already voted by mail as an overseas voter). I'm still disappointed about the whole fact-check thing.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

The fact checking of the last debate really made it stand out. It felt like the debate served an actual purpose as opposed to just hearing what amounted to a mini rally for the candidates.

This is a huge disappointment to me, as now there is no need to defend any of their comments. It's basically just a campaign ad.

[-] Geek_King@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

What a crazy attack from Vance, why isn't the Vice President fixing the housing crisis? Wasn't Trump President and didn't fix real issues with in his purview.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago

Finally Waltz telling him the VP isn't responsible, Congress is. I think he's slipped that in a couple times now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

No, you dick. Walz was right and everything you said wasn’t true. Everything got worse under trump, and I have fucking receipts.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

I'm enjoying the fact that CBS brought receipts about Vance's past statements about Donald Trump.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

"Do you want to support Catholic hospitals to perform abortions against their will?" FUCKING YES.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Maybe let’s fund national health care!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Wait there’s more? I am going to bed.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 15 points 1 month ago

walz is getting so annoyed at vance bald face laws. vance trying to distort walzs own law. man walz is doing a good job of restraining himself though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] socsa@piefed.social 15 points 1 month ago

Damn I was a bit worried that we weren't going to get the decisive soundbite, but all anyone is going to talk about tomorrow is going to be the "did Donald Trump lose?" mic drop. Absolutely savage.

[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago

Guns go from the US to Mexico, not the other way. Another blatant lie.

[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago

Vance: “Our policies aren’t our policies. We actually support your favored policies. You’re not allowed to fact check me. I’ll go back to our real policies tomorrow.”

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
119 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19098 readers
5210 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS